Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcomes With Different Stapling Devices

NCT02731079 — Not applicable, Terminated, 62 participants, Edna Rath

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Prospective Comparison of Sleeve Gastrectomy Outcomes With Different Stapling Devices

RegistryNCT02731079
StatusTerminated - Study expired before any data was analyzed.
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment
Enrollment62 (Actual)
SponsorEdna Rath (Fed)
ConditionsMorbid Obesity
InterventionsCovidien iDrive, Ethicon Echilon (Device)
Datesstart 2018-01-22, primary completion 2020-12-22, completion 2020-12-22, first posted 2016-04-07, last updated 2026-01-12
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Morbid Obesity All trials of Covidien iDrive All trials of Ethicon Echilon

-Summary

Sleeve gastrectomy is now the most commonly performed bariatric surgery. While many studies have evaluated factors that may minimize post-operative hemorrhage and staple-line leak, the investigators are unaware of any studies that compare outcomes between devices from the two main stapler manufacturers used in this surgery, Covidien and Ethicon. The purpose of this study is to compare intraoperative characteristics, such as time to create sleeve, intraoperative bleeding, and time needed to load each cartridge, and post-operative characteristics, such as any complication requiring readmission (leak or hemorrhage), further surgical intervention, and weight loss, between patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy with Covidien devices and Ethicon devices. Currently the investigators predominantly use whatever device is cheaper, but cost should not be the primary decisive factor if one device is superior to the other. If one device has better clinical outcomes, it should be the preferred device regardless of cost. If neither proves superiority, the investigators can justify using cost to determine which device to use in patient care.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

New bariatric patients who have elected for a sleeve gastrectomy as part of standard of care will be invited to participate in the study during the bariatric clinic at William Beaumont Army Medical Center. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in the study. These patients will be consented in the bariatric clinic by a research coordinator (Doreen Bandari-Spaulding) or physician listed on the study if the coordinator is unavailable.

Three folders will be made, one for each bariatric surgeon, and 25 Covidien cards and 25 Ethicon cards will be placed into each for a total of 150 patients. All bariatric surgeons are trained and familiar with both devices. Once consented, a card will be removed at random to determine which stapler will be used. Bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement will be utilized with both staplers. Once in the operating room, the case start time, time from first staple firing to completion of sleeve, total stapler loads required, number of staple misfires, character of any staple line bleeding, and time for tech to load each cartridge will be recorded on a data collection sheet by a research resident, listed as an associative investigator on this protocol. The subject's post-operative course will follow the bariatric protocol. During follow-up, they will be monitored for weight loss, post-operative complications, and any other required interventions. This information will be obtained by reviewing the subject's medical record after follow-up appointments. Per the institutional bariatric protocol, subjects will follow-up at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and annually. If a subject withdraws consent for the study prior to surgery, they will still receive surgery and perioperative treatment in line with institutional protocol, and they will be withdrawn and create a vacancy for a new subject. If a subject withdraws consent after surgery, data collection will cease for that subject. The investigators will clarify whether they want all data to be removed from the study or if they simply want no more data to be entered into the study and abide by their wishes, and they will remain in the original randomized group in accordance with intention-to-treat principles.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
CovidienActive comparatorDevice: Covidien iDriveGroup that will have sleeve gastrectomy performed using the Covidien iDrive powered stapler with absorbable polymer membrane staple line reinforcement.
EthiconActive comparatorDevice: Ethicon EchilonGroup that will have sleeve gastrectomy performed using the Ethicon Echilon powered stapler with absorbable polymer membrane staple line reinforcement.
  • Covidien iDrive (Device): Surgery performed with Covidien powered stapler
  • Ethicon Echilon (Device): Surgery performed with Ethicon powered stapler

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Time [Time from first staple firing to last staple firing, for up to 5 hours]: Time to create sleeve.
  • Staple Firings With Technical Difficulties [Time from first staple firing to last staple firing, for up to 5 hours]: Percent of staple firings with technical difficulties
  • Load Time [Time from first staple firing to last staple firing, for up to 5 hours]: Time to load staple cartridges

Secondary outcomes

  • Intra-operative Staple Line Bleeding [Time from first staple firing to end of the case, for up to 5 hours]: Will note any incidental bleeding along staple line and how many maneuvers were needed to control it. Measured as: 1) None, 2) Single therapy, 3) Multiple therapy (Any combination of hemostatic modalities)
  • Weight Loss [Pre-operative appointment to up to 1 year post-operative, for up to 1 year after sleeve creation]: Weight loss in percent excess body weight loss at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and up to 1 year
  • Leak Rates [Immediate post-operative period to conclusion of study, for up to 5 hours]: Staple line leak rates
  • Readmissions [Immediate post-operative period to conclusion of study, for up to 30 days after sleeve creation]: Hospital readmissions or emergency room visits; Will note reason for readmission
  • Sleeve-related Complications Requiring Surgery, Recorded as Yes or no [Immediate post-operative period to conclusion of study, for up to 1 year after sleeve creation]: Will note intervention required and indication; reasons include, but are not limiting to, staple line leak, hematoma, abscess, prolonged tachycardia suspicious for intra-abdominal pathology

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Informed consent obtained and signed from each subject
2. Age ≥ 18 years
3. Requirement for agreement to avoid conception
4. BMI >40
5. BMI >35 with obesity-related co-morbidity
6. Pre-operative psychiatric evaluation
7. Pre-operative laboratory studies that fail to demonstrate secondary cause of obesity
8. Full course of triple therapy for patients with Helicobacter pylori on upper endoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Pregnancy- Patients are not eligible for bariatric surgery, and if they become pregnant after surgery, they would present confounding variables and alter weight loss
2. Tobacco use within one month of surgery or any time within study period- Most staff will not perform bariatric surgery on active smokers as it negatively impacts healing
3. Prior bariatric surgery- Makes repeat bariatric surgery more difficult and could increase risk of complications
4. Inflammatory bowel disease- Rare diagnosis that may increase chance of complications, thus confounding results
5. Active duty military- Not eligible for bariatric surgery

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneCovidienEthicon
Started3032
Completed3032
Not completed00

Outcome results

  • Time (Primary)
  • Staple Firings With Technical Difficulties (Primary)
  • Load Time (Primary)
  • Intra-operative Staple Line Bleeding (Secondary)
  • Weight Loss (Secondary)
  • Leak Rates (Secondary)
  • Readmissions (Secondary)
  • Sleeve-related Complications Requiring Surgery, Recorded as Yes or no (Secondary)

Adverse events

Time frame: 1 year

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Covidien0/30 (0.0%)0/30 (0.0%)0/30 (0.0%)
Ethicon0/32 (0.0%)0/32 (0.0%)0/32 (0.0%)

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
William Beaumont Army Medical CenterEl Paso, TexasUnited States

+Publications

  • Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311(8):806-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732. PMID 24570244
  • Nguyen NT, Nguyen B, Gebhart A, Hohmann S. Changes in the makeup of bariatric surgery: a national increase in use of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Feb;216(2):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Nov 21. PMID 23177371
  • Marceau P, Hould FS, Simard S, Lebel S, Bourque RA, Potvin M, Biron S. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. World J Surg. 1998 Sep;22(9):947-54. doi: 10.1007/s002689900498. PMID 9717420
  • Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000 Dec;10(6):514-23; discussion 524. doi: 10.1381/096089200321593715. PMID 11175958
  • Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, Pomp A. Early experience with two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg. 2003 Dec;13(6):861-4. doi: 10.1381/096089203322618669. PMID 14738671
  • ASMBS Clinical Issues Committee. Updated position statement on sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 May-Jun;8(3):e21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Feb 10. No abstract available. PMID 22417852
  • D'Ugo S, Gentileschi P, Benavoli D, Cerci M, Gaspari A, Berta RD, Moretto C, Bellini R, Basso N, Casella G, Soricelli E, Cutolo P, Formisano G, Angrisani L, Anselmino M. Comparative use of different techniques for leak and bleeding prevention during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 May-Jun;10(3):450-4. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Nov 12. PMID 24448100
  • Gentileschi P, Camperchioli I, D'Ugo S, Benavoli D, Gaspari AL. Staple-line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using three different techniques: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2623-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2243-2. Epub 2012 Mar 23. PMID 22441975
  • Glaysher M, Khan OA, Mabvuure NT, Wan A, Reddy M, Vasilikostas G. Staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does it affect clinical outcomes? Int J Surg. 2013;11(4):286-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Feb 28. PMID 23459188
  • Sroka G, Milevski D, Shteinberg D, Mady H, Matter I. Minimizing Hemorrhagic Complications in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy--a Randomized Controlled Trial. Obes Surg. 2015 Sep;25(9):1577-83. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1580-3. PMID 25596939
  • Gagner M, Buchwald JN. Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in four staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Jul-Aug;10(4):713-23. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 28. PMID 24745978
  • Huang R, Gagner M. A Thickness Calibration Device Is Needed to Determine Staple Height and Avoid Leaks in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2015 Dec;25(12):2360-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1705-8. PMID 26024735

+Study documents

+Investigators