tES With Random Noise Stimulation Applied to Children With Brain Injury

NCT02656433 — Not applicable, Completed, 92 participants, Spanish Foundation for Neurometrics Development

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Transcranial Noninvasive Brain Stimulation With Random Noise for Children With Congenital or Acquired Brain Injury

RegistryNCT02656433, acronym BrainInjury
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: double, treatment
Enrollment92 (Actual)
SponsorSpanish Foundation for Neurometrics Development (Other); collaborators: Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
ConditionsBrain Injury, Motor Skills Disorders
InterventionsTranscranial Random Noise Stimulation, Physiotherapy (Device, other)
Datesstart 2017-03-01, primary completion 2021-09-13, completion 2023-01-31, first posted 2016-01-15, last updated 2024-05-07
Locations1 site in United Kingdom

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Brain Injury All trials for Motor Skills Disorders All trials of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation All trials of Physiotherapy

-Summary

50 children between 4 and 7 years old with moderate to severe motor impairment, 50% males 50% females will participate in an interventional study in two groups: placebo and experimental group.

Placebo group will only receive traditional treatment with physiotherapy and the Experimental or tRNS Group will receive physiotherapy plus tRNS BrainNoninvasive Stimulation.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

In this Interventional Study with Double Blind Assignment to Placebo and Experimental Group, Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) and Neurophysiological are the parameters measured with EEG amplifier before and after 30 sessions.

Work hypothesis is that the tRNS Group will present better motor functionality after 30 sessions of 30 minutes of duration of electrical brain stimulation administered during physiotherapy exercises 2 days per week than the Group that only receives treatment with physiotherapy during 30 minutes 2 days per week without tRNS.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Placebo GroupPlacebo comparatorOther: PhysiotherapyReceive treatment with physiotherapy
Experimental or tRNS GroupExperimentalDevice: Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation; Other: PhysiotherapyReceive treatment with physiotherapy plus Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (tRNS)
  • Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation (Device), also known as tRNS: A special Helmet supply weak electrical currents in the head
  • Physiotherapy (Other): Standard of care physiotherapy aimed to the motor impairment the subject presents

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) as measured by the Gross Motor Function scale [Up to five months]: Motor Functionality Scale

Secondary outcomes

  • Differences in Power Fast Fourier Transformation before and after intervention [up to five months]: Changes in Power in EEG over different electrodes

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 3 Years to 7 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients between 3 and 7 years.
* Meet criteria for Congenital or Acquired Brain Injury .
* Patients who have been diagnosed at least 1 year before inclusion in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Acute visual or hearing loss.
* Other neurological disorders: migraine, epilepsy, tuberous sclerosis
* Other neurodevelopmental disorders like ASD, ADHD, PDD, etc ...

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
New RemediesLiverpool, MerseysideUnited Kingdom

+Publications

  • Bashir S, Yoo WK. Cheap Technology Like Transcrinal Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Could Help in Stroke Rehabilitation in South Asia. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2013 Summer;4(3):188-9. No abstract available. PMID 25337347
  • Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 2011 Feb;17(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614. PMID 21343407
  • Results publication: Benninger DH, Lomarev M, Lopez G, Wassermann EM, Li X, Considine E, Hallett M. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;81(10):1105-11. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.202556. PMID 20870863
  • Results publication: Fregni F, Boggio PS, Valle AC, Rocha RR, Duarte J, Ferreira MJ, Wagner T, Fecteau S, Rigonatti SP, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Pascual-Leone A. A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Stroke. 2006 Aug;37(8):2115-22. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000231390.58967.6b. Epub 2006 Jun 29. PMID 16809569
  • Results publication: Vanneste S, Fregni F, De Ridder D. Head-to-Head Comparison of Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation, Transcranial AC Stimulation, and Transcranial DC Stimulation for Tinnitus. Front Psychiatry. 2013 Dec 18;4:158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00158. eCollection 2013. PMID 24391599
  • Results publication: Fregni F, Otachi PT, Do Valle A, Boggio PS, Thut G, Rigonatti SP, Pascual-Leone A, Valente KD. A randomized clinical trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2006 Oct;60(4):447-55. doi: 10.1002/ana.20950. PMID 17068786
  • Results publication: Fertonani A, Pirulli C, Miniussi C. Random noise stimulation improves neuroplasticity in perceptual learning. J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 26;31(43):15416-23. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-11.2011. PMID 22031888
  • Results publication: Ilyukhina VA, Kozhushko NY, Matveev YK, Ponomareva EA, Chernysheva EM, Shaptilei MA. Transcranial micropolarization in the combined therapy of speech and general psychomotor retardation in children of late preschool age. Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2005 Nov;35(9):969-76. doi: 10.1007/s11055-005-0153-7. PMID 16270180
  • Results publication: McCleery JP, Elliott NA, Sampanis DS, Stefanidou CA. Motor development and motor resonance difficulties in autism: relevance to early intervention for language and communication skills. Front Integr Neurosci. 2013 Apr 24;7:30. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00030. eCollection 2013. PMID 23630476
  • Results publication: Mueller A, Candrian G, Kropotov JD, Ponomarev VA, Baschera GM. Classification of ADHD patients on the basis of independent ERP components using a machine learning system. Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 2010 Jun 3;4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1753-4631-4-S1-S1. PMID 20522259
  • Results publication: Mueller A, Candrian G, Grane VA, Kropotov JD, Ponomarev VA, Baschera GM. Discriminating between ADHD adults and controls using independent ERP components and a support vector machine: a validation study. Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 2011 Jul 19;5:5. doi: 10.1186/1753-4631-5-5. PMID 21771289
  • Results publication: Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x. PMID 10990547
  • Results publication: Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001 Nov 27;57(10):1899-901. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899. PMID 11723286
  • Results publication: Nitsche MA, Nitsche MS, Klein CC, Tergau F, Rothwell JC, Paulus W. Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Apr;114(4):600-4. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00412-1. PMID 12686268
  • Results publication: Nitsche MA, Doemkes S, Karakose T, Antal A, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):3109-17. doi: 10.1152/jn.01312.2006. Epub 2007 Jan 24. PMID 17251360
  • Results publication: Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1. PMID 20633386
  • Results publication: Paulus W. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES - tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011 Oct;21(5):602-17. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.557292. Epub 2011 Aug 5. PMID 21819181
  • Results publication: Priori A, Berardelli A, Rona S, Accornero N, Manfredi M. Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Neuroreport. 1998 Jul 13;9(10):2257-60. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199807130-00020. PMID 9694210
  • Results publication: Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull. 2007 May 30;72(4-6):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Jan 24. PMID 17452283
  • Results publication: Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14. PMID 19833552
  • Results publication: Schlaug G, Renga V, Nair D. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2008 Dec;65(12):1571-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.12.1571. PMID 19064743
  • Results publication: Schneider HD, Hopp JP. The use of the Bilingual Aphasia Test for assessment and transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate language acquisition in minimally verbal children with autism. Clin Linguist Phon. 2011 Jun;25(6-7):640-54. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2011.570852. Epub 2011 Jun 1. PMID 21631313
  • Results publication: Zaehle T, Rach S, Herrmann CS. Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG. PLoS One. 2010 Nov 1;5(11):e13766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013766. PMID 21072168

+Investigators