Aflibercept in Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

NCT02120950 — Phase 4, Completed, 333 participants, Bayer

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Randomized, Double-masked, Sham-controlled Phase 3b/4 Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravitreal Aflibercept Monotherapy Compared to Aflibercept With Adjunctive Photodynamic Therapy as Indicated in Subjects With Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

RegistryNCT02120950, acronym PLANET
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 4
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: quadruple, treatment
Enrollment333 (Actual)
SponsorBayer (Industry); collaborators: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
ConditionsNeovascular Macular Degeneration
InterventionsAflibercept (Eylea, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321), Visudyne (Drug, other)
Datesstart 2014-05-29, primary completion 2016-08-12, completion 2017-07-07, first posted 2014-04-23, last updated 2020-12-02
Locations62 sites in Australia, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Neovascular Macular Degeneration All trials of Aflibercept (Eylea, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) All trials of Visudyne

-Summary

To collect data reflecting the efficacy and safety of aflibercept with and without photodynamic therapy in subjects diagnosed with the polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy subtype of wet age-related macular degeneration

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Aflibercept + Sham PDTExperimentalDrug: Aflibercept (Eylea, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321)Participants received 2 milligram (mg) Intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) (Eylea, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) every month for the first 3 months (run-in period). At Week 12, subjects were randomized to receive Aflibercept injection plus sham photodynamic therapy (only in subjects qualifying for rescue therapy)
Aflibercept + Active PDTExperimentalDrug: Aflibercept (Eylea, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321); Other: VisudyneParticipants received 2 mg Intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) (Eylea, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) every month for the first 3 months (run-in period). At Week 12, subjects were randomized to receive Aflibercept injection plus active photodynamic therapy (only in subjects qualifying for rescue therapy)
  • Aflibercept (Eylea, VEGF Trap-Eye, BAY86-5321) (Drug): Eylea is administered as an intravitreal injection
  • Visudyne (Other): Photodynamic therapy is a combined therapy of drug (Visudyne) applied to reinforce the action of a device (laser)

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured by Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Scores From Baseline to Week 52 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) [From Baseline to Week 52]: Visual function of the study eye and fellow eye was assessed at each study visit according to the standard procedure developed for the ETDRS adapted for Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS), using 70 letter charts at a starting distance of 4 meters. Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of an eye chart (5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until they reached a row where a minimum of three letters on a line could be read, and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified.

Secondary outcomes

  • Percentage of Subjects Who Avoided at Least 15 Letters Loss in ETDRS at Week 52 [At Week 52]: Visual function of the study eye and fellow eye was assessed at each study visit according to the standard procedure developed for the ETDRS adapted for Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS), using 70 letter charts at a starting distance of 4 meters. Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of an eye chart (5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until they reached a row where a minimum of three letters on a line could be read, and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified.

Other outcomes

  • Percentage of Subjects Who Never Need Rescue Therapy in the First Year [Baseline to Week 52]: Evaluations for qualification for rescue were conducted at each visit from Week 12 to Week 52. Intensified aflibercept treatment plus active or sham PDT treatments were given at any of these visits if treatment criteria were met. Qualification for rescue was based upon insufficient gain of BCVA, leakage, and presence of active polyps.
  • Number of PDT Treatments in the Study Eye Before Week 52 [Baseline to Week 52]
  • Number of Aflibercept Treatments in the Study Eye (After Randomization) Before Week 52 [Baseline to Week 52]
  • Time to First Administration of PDT in the Study Eye Before Week 52 [Baseline to Week 52]
  • Change of Visual Acuity (Letters) From Baseline Over Time (Week) in the Study Eye [Baseline to Week 52]: Visual function of the study eye and fellow eye was assessed at each study visit according to the standard procedure developed for the ETDRS adapted for Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS), using 70 letter charts at a starting distance of 4 meters. Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of an eye chart (5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until they reached a row where a minimum of three letters on a line could be read, and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified.
  • Percentage of Subjects Who Gained ≥5, 10, or 15 Letters at Week 52 [Baseline to Week 52]: Visual function of the study eye and fellow eye was assessed at each study visit according to the standard procedure developed for the ETDRS adapted for Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS), using 70 letter charts at a starting distance of 4 meters. Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of an eye chart (5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until they reached a row where a minimum of three letters on a line could be read, and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified.
  • Percentage of Subjects Who Lost ≥5, 10, or 15 Letters at Week 52 [Baseline to Week 52]: Visual function of the study eye and fellow eye was assessed at each study visit according to the standard procedure developed for the ETDRS adapted for Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS), using 70 letter charts at a starting distance of 4 meters. Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of an eye chart (5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until they reached a row where a minimum of three letters on a line could be read, and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified.
  • Percentage of Subjects With Complete Polyp Regression at Week 52 [Baseline to Week 52]: Complete polyp regression was defined as absent or indeterminate visual polyps on Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) in the study eye.
  • Change of Leakage Area in Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye at Week 52 [Baseline to Week 52]: Leakage is the release of fluorescein dye from diseased retinal vessels. Leakage area is defined as the area showing presence of fluorescein dye in the late stages of fluorescein angiography.
  • Change of Central Subfield Thickness (CST) on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) From Baseline to Week 52 [Baseline to Week 52]: Retinal and lesion characteristics, such as central retinal thickness (CRT), were evaluated by OCT in both eyes at every study visit. CRT was measured using optical coherence tomography to determine the average thickness of the retina in a circle with 1 millimeter of diameter centered on the fovea. This value is reported by some OCT devices as central subfield thickness (CST).
  • Change in National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Total Score From Baseline to Week 52 [Baseline to Week 52]: The NEI VFQ-25 total score ranges from 0-100 with a score of 0 being the worst outcome and 100 being the best outcome. The NEI VFQ questionnaire is organized as a collection of subscales which are all scored from 0-100. To reach the overall composite score, each sub-scale score is averaged in order to give each sub-scale equal weight.
  • Percentage of Subjects for Whom Rescue Therapy is Indicated Over the Course Till Week 52 [Baseline to Week 52]: Evaluations for qualification for rescue were conducted at each visit from Week 12 to Week 52. Intensified aflibercept treatment plus active or sham PDT treatments were given at any of these visits if treatment criteria were met. Qualification for rescue was based upon insufficient gain of BCVA, leakage, and presence of active polyps.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 50 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Signed informed consent
* Men and women ≥50 years of age
* Diagnosis of symptomatic macular Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (PCV) in the study eye established by Indocyanine Green Angiography(ICGA) at the study center
* Greatest linear dimension of the lesion of < 5400 mm (approximately, 9 Macular Photocoagulation Study disk areas), assessed by ICGA.
* An Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) BCVA of 73 to 24 letters in the study eye.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Prior use of intravitreal or sub-tenon corticosteroids in the study eye within 3 months prior to study entry
* Any prior use of intraocular anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF)agents in the study eye, or systemic use of anti VEGF products within 3 months prior to study entry
* Prior macular laser treatment in the study eye including Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
* History of allergy to fluorescein used in fluorescein angiography, iodine and/or indocyanine green.
* History of allergy to aflibercept, verteporfin, or their excipients.

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneAflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)Aflibercept + Active PDTAflibercept (Non-randomized)
Started15716115
Completed1371470
Not completed201415

Outcome results

  • Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured by Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Scores From Baseline to Week 52 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) (Primary), Mean, Letters correctly read: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) 10.7 +/- 11.3; Aflibercept + Active PDT 10.8 +/- 10.7 (p 0.5480)
  • Percentage of Subjects Who Avoided at Least 15 Letters Loss in ETDRS at Week 52 (Secondary), Number, Percentage of subjects: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) 97.5; Aflibercept + Active PDT 96.9 (p 0.7402)
  • Percentage of Subjects Who Never Need Rescue Therapy in the First Year (Other pre specified), Number, Percentage of subjects: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) 87.9; Aflibercept + Active PDT 85.7
  • Number of PDT Treatments in the Study Eye Before Week 52 (Other pre specified), Mean, PDT administrations: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) 0.2 +/- 0.7; Aflibercept + Active PDT 0.2 +/- 0.4 (p 0.0682)
  • Number of Aflibercept Treatments in the Study Eye (After Randomization) Before Week 52 (Other pre specified), Mean, Aflibercept injections: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) 5.2 +/- 1.1; Aflibercept + Active PDT 5.1 +/- 0.8 (p 0.1640)
  • Time to First Administration of PDT in the Study Eye Before Week 52 (Other pre specified), Mean, Days: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) 131.2 (80 to 278); Aflibercept + Active PDT 128.2 (80 to 315)
  • Change of Visual Acuity (Letters) From Baseline Over Time (Week) in the Study Eye (Other pre specified), Mean, Letters: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) 10.7 +/- 11.3; Aflibercept + Active PDT 10.8 +/- 10.7
  • Percentage of Subjects Who Gained ≥5, 10, or 15 Letters at Week 52 (Other pre specified), Number, Percentage of subjects: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) 73.9; Aflibercept + Active PDT 78.9 (p 0.2348)
  • Percentage of Subjects Who Lost ≥5, 10, or 15 Letters at Week 52 (Other pre specified), Number, Percentage of subjects: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) 7.0; Aflibercept + Active PDT 5.6 (p 0.5372)
  • Percentage of Subjects With Complete Polyp Regression at Week 52 (Other pre specified), Number, Percetage of subjects: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) 38.9; Aflibercept + Active PDT 44.8 (p 0.3244)
  • Change of Leakage Area in Fluorescein Angiography (FA) in the Study Eye at Week 52 (Other pre specified), Mean, Square millimeter: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) -1.3 +/- 3.6; Aflibercept + Active PDT -1.2 +/- 3.7 (p 0.7109)
  • Change of Central Subfield Thickness (CST) on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) From Baseline to Week 52 (Other pre specified), Mean, Millimeter: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) -137.7 +/- 116.0; Aflibercept + Active PDT -143.5 +/- 110.5 (p 0.8355)
  • Change in National Eye Institute 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) Total Score From Baseline to Week 52 (Other pre specified), Mean, Scores on a scale: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) 4.7 +/- 10.3; Aflibercept + Active PDT 7.3 +/- 12.5 (p 0.5069)
  • Percentage of Subjects for Whom Rescue Therapy is Indicated Over the Course Till Week 52 (Other pre specified), Number, Percentage of subjects: Aflibercept + Sham Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) 12.1; Aflibercept + Active PDT 14.3 (p 0.8423)

Adverse events

Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days after the last treatment. Approximately 100 weeks.

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Aflibercept + Sham PDT3/157 (1.9%)27/157 (17.2%)59/157 (37.6%)
Aflibercept + Active PDT0/161 (0.0%)25/161 (15.5%)49/161 (30.4%)
Aflibercept (Non-randomized)1/15 (6.7%)4/15 (26.7%)3/15 (20.0%)

Serious adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemAflibercept + Sham PDTAflibercept + Active PDTAflibercept (Non-randomized)
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders1/1570/1610/15
Angina unstableCardiac disorders1/1570/1610/15
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders2/1570/1610/15
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders1/1571/1610/15
Coronary artery stenosisCardiac disorders1/1571/1610/15
Stress cardiomyopathyCardiac disorders1/1570/1610/15
CataractEye disorders2/1570/1610/15
Eyelid ptosisEye disorders0/1571/1610/15
Retinal artery occlusionEye disorders0/1571/1610/15
Retinal haemorrhageEye disorders0/1571/1610/15
Visual acuity reducedEye disorders0/1572/1610/15
Retinal pigment epithelial tearEye disorders0/1570/1611/15
IleusGastrointestinal disorders1/1571/1610/15
Inguinal herniaGastrointestinal disorders0/1571/1610/15
Large intestine perforationGastrointestinal disorders1/1570/1610/15
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders1/1570/1610/15
Large intestine polypGastrointestinal disorders1/1571/1610/15
Inguinal hernia strangulatedGastrointestinal disorders1/1570/1610/15
DeathGeneral disorders1/1570/1610/15
Sudden cardiac deathGeneral disorders0/1570/1611/15
Bile duct stoneHepatobiliary disorders0/1571/1610/15
Ear infectionInfections and infestations1/1570/1610/15
EndophthalmitisInfections and infestations1/1571/1610/15
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/1573/1610/15
Septic shockInfections and infestations1/1570/1610/15
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/1571/1610/15
Animal biteInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1570/1610/15
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/1570/1610/15
Femoral neck fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1570/1610/15
Head injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1571/1610/15
Hip fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1570/1610/15
Joint dislocationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1570/1610/15
Radius fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1570/1610/15
Rib fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/1570/1610/15
Scapula fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1570/1610/15
Subdural haematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1570/1610/15
Lumbar vertebral fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1570/1610/15
Afferent loop syndromeInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1571/1610/15
Traumatic haemothoraxInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/1570/1610/15
Iron deficiencyMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/1570/1610/15
Cervical spinal stenosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1571/1610/15
ExostosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1570/1610/15
Lumbar spinal stenosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1571/1610/15
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1570/1610/15
OsteonecrosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1570/1610/15
Acoustic neuromaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1570/1611/15
Adenocarcinoma gastricNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1570/1610/15
Colon cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1571/1610/15
Gastric cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1571/1610/15
Metastases to lungNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1570/1610/15
NeoplasmNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1570/1610/15
Thyroid neoplasmNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1570/1610/15
Lung neoplasm malignantNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1571/1610/15
Gastric adenomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1571/1610/15
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1571/1610/15
Senile dementiaNervous system disorders0/1570/1611/15
HaematuriaRenal and urinary disorders1/1570/1610/15
UreterolithiasisRenal and urinary disorders1/1570/1610/15
Benign prostatic hyperplasiaReproductive system and breast disorders0/1571/1610/15
CystoceleReproductive system and breast disorders1/1570/1610/15

6 more terms not shown.

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemAflibercept + Sham PDTAflibercept + Active PDTAflibercept (Non-randomized)
Conjunctival haemorrhageEye disorders10/1575/1610/15
Dry eyeEye disorders6/15711/1610/15
Ocular hypertensionEye disorders3/1571/1611/15
Visual acuity reducedEye disorders7/1579/1610/15
Vitreous floatersEye disorders9/1571/1610/15
Retinal pigment epithelial tearEye disorders4/1570/1611/15
Viral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations25/15718/1610/15
Intraocular pressure increasedInvestigations6/1579/1610/15
DepressionPsychiatric disorders1/1570/1611/15
HypertensionVascular disorders6/15713/1612/15

+Locations (62)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Liverpool, New South WalesAustralia
Strathfield, New South WalesAustralia
Westmead, New South WalesAustralia
East Melbourne, VictoriaAustralia
ParramattaAustralia
MünchenGermany
Hong KongHong Kong
KowloonHong Kong
BudapestHungary
BudapestHungary
BudapestHungary
DebrecenHungary
Nagoya, Aichi-kenJapan
Urayasu, ChibaJapan
Ōgaki, GifuJapan
Maebashi, GunmaJapan
Asahikawa, HokkaidoJapan
Sapporo, HokkaidoJapan
Amagasaki, HyōgoJapan
Kobe, HyōgoJapan
Kita, Kagawa-kenJapan
Tsu, Mie-kenJapan
Kashihara, NaraJapan
Hirakata, OsakaJapan
Suita, OsakaJapan
Ōtsu, ShigaJapan
Hamamatsu, ShizuokaJapan
Shimotsuke, TochigiJapan
Bunkyo-ku, TokyoJapan
Chiyoda-ku, TokyoJapan
Meguro-ku, TokyoJapan
Mitaka, TokyoJapan
Shinjuku-ku, TokyoJapan
Shinjuku-ku, TokyoJapan
AkitaJapan
AomoriJapan
ChibaJapan
FukuokaJapan
FukuokaJapan
FukushimaJapan
KumamotoJapan
KyotoJapan
KyotoJapan
NagasakiJapan
OkayamaJapan
OsakaJapan
TokushimaJapan
WakayamaJapan
SingaporeSingapore
SingaporeSingapore
Seongnam-si, GyeonggidoSouth Korea
SeoulSouth Korea
SeoulSouth Korea
SeoulSouth Korea
SeoulSouth Korea
SeoulSouth Korea
Changhua, ChanghuaTaiwan
Kaohsiung CityTaiwan
TaipeiTaiwan
TaipeiTaiwan
TaipeiTaiwan
TaipeiTaiwan

+Publications

  • Results publication: Teo KYC, Yoon YH, Honda S, Park KH, Takahashi H, Ideta R, Sekiryu T, Hirata A, Obana A, Mori R, Chen SJ, Chee C, Wong JG, Lai TYY, Wong I, Fung N, Lee WK, Terasaki H, Chen SC, Miyatani T, Iida T, Obata R, Machewitz T, Leal S, Cheung CMG. Six-Year Outcomes in Subjects with Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy in the PLANET Study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2026 Jun;15(6):1907-1924. doi: 10.1007/s40123-026-01366-5. Epub 2026 Mar 28. PMID 41903075
  • Results publication: Lee WK, Iida T, Ogura Y, Chen SJ, Wong TY, Mitchell P, Cheung GCM, Zhang Z, Leal S, Ishibashi T; PLANET Investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy in the PLANET Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 1;136(7):786-793. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1804. PMID 29801063

+Investigators

  • Bayer Study Director, Study director, Bayer