Basal Insulin Therapy in Patients With Insulin Resistance: A 6 Month Comparison of Insulin Glargine and NPH Insulin
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Diabetes All trials of Switching to NPH insulin All trials of Continuation of insulin glargine
-Summary
This study will compare the safety, effectiveness, and cost of two different types of long-acting insulin.
Expand all sections · Collapse all
+Detailed description
In this study the investigators will be comparing two long-acting insulins, insulin glargine and NPH insulin. The trial will be evaluating differences in effectiveness, safety and cost between the two agents when used in patients on more than 80 units or 1unit/kg long-acting insulin. The investigators hypothesis is that patients switched from lantus to NPH will have improved blood glucose control.
+Arms and interventions
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|
| Switching to NPH insulin | Experimental | Drug: Switching to NPH insulin | Patients in this arm will be transitioned from insulin glargine to NPH insulin with subsequent titration according to algorithm within protocol. If needed, meal-time insulin will be added during study period. |
| Continuation of insulin glargine | Active comparator | Drug: Continuation of insulin glargine | Patients in this arm will continue on insulin glargine and serve as a control group. |
- Switching to NPH insulin (Drug), also known as Humulin N, Novolin N, Novolin NPH, NPH Iletin II, Isophane insulin: Patients in this arm will be transitioned from insulin glargine to NPH insulin with subsequent titration according to algorithm within protocol. If needed, meal-time insulin will be added during study period.
- Continuation of insulin glargine (Drug), also known as Lantus: Patients in this group will serve as a control group, and information will be collected regarding the safety, effectiveness, and cost of treatment for use in this study.
+Outcome measures
Primary outcomes
- Difference in A1C between groups at 6 months [6 months]
Secondary outcomes
- Difference in A1C between groups at 3 months [3 months]
- Difference in self-monitored blood glucose averages between groups [6 months]: Outside of A1C, the investigators will also be comparing self-monitored blood glucose averages within each group and comparing them to one another.
- Difference in incidence of hypoglycemia between each group [6 months]: * Mild = symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia during which the subject was able to self-treat and was associated with blood glucose < 70mg/dL
* Severe = symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia during which the subject required the assistance of another person and was associated with either a glucose level < 56 mg/dL or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon
* Nocturnal hypoglycemia = hypoglycemia as described above occurring after the subject goes to bed and before the measurement of glucose, eating breakfast, or administration of any glucose-lowering agent in the morning
- Difference in units of basal insulin used per day between groups [6 months]
- Difference in total units of insulin per day between groups [6 months]
- Difference in percent of patients who require initiation/titration of prandial insulin between each group [6 months]
- Difference in rate of mortality in each group during study period [6 months]
- Difference in morbidity between each group during study period [6 months]: Morbidity defined as glycemia-related hospitalizations, ER visits, immediate care clinic visits (hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar hyperglycemic nonketotic syndrome, hospitalizations diagnosed as related to diabetes with diagnosis code)
- Compare cost of insulin therapy over study period at study completion [6 months]: Costs will be calculated as direct patient cost and total cost of medication.
- Differences in change in weight during study period between groups [6 months]: Weight change in each patient will be calculated using weight at study initiation and completion
- Difference in number of visits with clinical pharmacist [6 months]
+Eligibility
Sex: All, ages: any to 85 Years, accepts healthy volunteers
Inclusion Criteria:
* Adult patients at 22 Providence Medical Group primary care clinics
* Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus
* Currently using greater than 80 units/day of insulin glargine or greater than 1 unit/kg/day of insulin glargine
* Current A1C > 8.5% (within 3 months of randomization)
Exclusion Criteria:
* Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus
* Age > 85 years
* Self-reported history of severe hypoglycemia or hypoglycemia unawareness
* Hospice/limited life expectancy
* Current enrollment in Providence Medical Group Medication Assistance Program
* Current use of a GLP1 agonist (i.e., liraglutide, exenatide, exenatide extended-release)
* End stage renal disease (i.e., dialysis or estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 ml/min/1.73m2)
* Cirrhosis
* Unstable coronary artery disease or chronic heart failure (i.e. an exacerbation or hospitalization within 6 months pre-randomization)
* Psychiatric condition that prevents adequate follow-up (i.e., > 3 missed follow-up visits within a 3 month period or persistent non-adherence to dosing or monitoring recommendations)
* Active alcohol or drug abuse
* Inability to provide informed consent
+Locations (1)
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|
| Providence Medical Group Northeast Clinic | Portland, Oregon | United States | |
+Publications
- Wang Z, Hedrington MS, Gogitidze Joy N, Briscoe VJ, Richardson MA, Younk L, Nicholson W, Tate DB, Davis SN. Dose-response effects of insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jul;33(7):1555-60. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2011. Epub 2010 Mar 31. PMID 20357371
- Fritsche A, Schweitzer MA, Haring HU; 4001 Study Group. Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 17;138(12):952-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-12-200306170-00006. PMID 12809451
- Eliaschewitz FG, Calvo C, Valbuena H, Ruiz M, Aschner P, Villena J, Ramirez LA, Jimenez J; HOE 901/4013 LA Study Group. Therapy in type 2 diabetes: insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin both in combination with glimepiride. Arch Med Res. 2006 May;37(4):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.10.015. PMID 16715577
- Yki-Jarvinen H, Kauppinen-Makelin R, Tiikkainen M, Vahatalo M, Virtamo H, Nikkila K, Tulokas T, Hulme S, Hardy K, McNulty S, Hanninen J, Levanen H, Lahdenpera S, Lehtonen R, Ryysy L. Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: the LANMET study. Diabetologia. 2006 Mar;49(3):442-51. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-0132-0. Epub 2006 Feb 3. PMID 16456680
- Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J; Insulin Glargine 4002 Study Investigators. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003 Nov;26(11):3080-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.11.3080. PMID 14578243
- Massi Benedetti M, Humburg E, Dressler A, Ziemen M. A one-year, randomised, multicentre trial comparing insulin glargine with NPH insulin in combination with oral agents in patients with type 2 diabetes. Horm Metab Res. 2003 Mar;35(3):189-96. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39080. PMID 12734781
- Rosenstock J, Schwartz SL, Clark CM Jr, Park GD, Donley DW, Edwards MB. Basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: 28-week comparison of insulin glargine (HOE 901) and NPH insulin. Diabetes Care. 2001 Apr;24(4):631-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.4.631. PMID 11315821
- Bota VM, Hirsch IB. Insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn in patients with severe insulin resistance: Is there a benefit? Endocr Pract. 2012 May-Jun;18(3):e49-51. doi: 10.4158/EP11302.CR. PMID 22232027
+Investigators