TrialReader


The Role That Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) Could Play in the Treatment of Achalasia

NCT01584635 — Not applicable, Completed, 20 participants, Mayo Clinic

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Treatment of Achalasia

RegistryNCT01584635, acronym POEM
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; na, single group, masking: none, treatment
Enrollment20 (Actual)
SponsorMayo Clinic (Other)
ConditionsAchalasia
InterventionsPeroral Endoscopic Myotomy a less invasive treatment for Achalasia (Procedure)
Datesstart 2012-01-01, primary completion 2016-01-01, completion 2016-01-01, first posted 2012-04-25, last updated 2016-10-31
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Achalasia All trials of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy a less invasive treatment for Achalasia

-Summary

Based on the work of the Doctors at the Mayo Clinic Rochester, a new technique for a less invasive treatment for Achalasia has been developed.

The purpose of this study is to decide the role this less invasive treatment (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) has in the treatment of patient's with achalasia.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)ExperimentalProcedure: Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy a less invasive treatment for AchalasiaPeroral Endoscopic Myotomy- a less invasive treatment for patients with Achalasia
  • Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy a less invasive treatment for Achalasia (Procedure), also known as Achalasia, Heller myotomy, Dysphagia, Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy, Disease of the muscle of the esophagus., Disorder of the swallowing tube., Esophageal Motility Disorders, Esophageal Achalasia: In this study we will follow patients undergoing Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy at 1 and 6 months post surgery,1,2,3,4,and 5 years post surgery with esophageal high resolution Manometry and a Barium Esophagram when it is not standard of care. We will have you fill out a symptom questionnaire at each visit

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Number of participants with adverse events [5 years post surgery]: Patients in this study, undergoing the Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy treatment for Achalasia, will be accessed at 1 month, 6 months, at 1-2-3-4 and year 5 post surgery. We will measure outcomes by number of adverse events, Eckardt symptom score, barium esophagram, and manometry studies.

Secondary outcomes

  • Eckardt symptom score [5 years]: By following participants regularly and closely both by symptomatic and objective criteria, we will be able to determine factors that predict response to the POEMS procedure.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients between the ages of 18 and 80 with achalasia diagnosed by a combination of compatible symptoms, barium esophagography and high resolution manometry.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients who are poor surgical risks, have had previous treatment for achalasia or esophageal or gastric surgery, have an epiphrenic diverticulum or are unwilling to be followed in the protocol.
* Female patients are eligible if they are NOT pregnant or lactating AND ne of the following criteria is met:
* The patient is surgically sterile (by means of hysterectomy/bilateral tubal ligation)
* The patient is at least one year postmenopausal (no menses for 12 months).
* The patient is using a highly effective method of contraception, if childbearing potential, AND has a negative urine human chorionic gonadotropin beta subunit (ß HCG) pregnancy test result during Screening, and prior to trial drug administration.
* Highly effective methods of birth control are defined as those which result in a low failure rate when used consistently and correctly such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some IUDs, sexual abstinence or vasectomized partner.
* Withdrawal, single- or double barrier methods (including condoms) and rhythm methods are NOT ACCEPTABLE methods of contraception for the purposes of this clinical trial due to the high incidence of contraceptive failures with these methods.
* Vulnerable populations, such as those with diminished mental acuity, will be excluded.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Mayo ClinicRochester, MinnesotaUnited States

+Investigators

My Notes