TrialReader


Premature Termination of Resuscitation in Survivors of Cardiac Arrest

NCT01472458 — Not applicable, Completed, 905 participants, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT01472458, acronym PremaTOR
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, single group, masking: single, health services research
Enrollment905 (Actual)
SponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Other); collaborators: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
ConditionsCardiac Arrest
InterventionsQuality improvement (Behavioral)
Datesstart 2011-11-01, primary completion 2014-06-01, completion 2014-06-01, first posted 2011-11-16, last updated 2017-02-06

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Cardiac Arrest All trials of Quality improvement

-Summary

The study Premature Termination of Resuscitation in Survivors of Cardiac Arrest focuses on using innovative knowledge translation strategies to improve appropriate neuroprognostication for survivors of cardiac arrest and prevent premature termination of life sustaining therapies. This is important because any early gains achieved during resuscitation will be nullified if clinicians terminate life-sustaining therapies prematurely based on inadequate prognostic information. An effective translation strategy for neuroprognostication will result in improved physician adherence to evidence-based medicine and an increase in the proportion of patients surviving to achieve a good neurological outcome following cardiac arrest.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

A stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design will be employed in order to properly evaluate the impact of this intervention. Each of the 18 participating hospitals will be randomized one of the four wedges according to a random schedule; each wedge will consist of 4 to 5 hospitals. With this design, the implementation of the intervention will be rolled out sequentially to the participating hospitals over a 5 month period for each wedge. All hospitals will have received the intervention by the end of the study.

Note that the study design fields provided by ClinicalTrials.gov do not allow for describing this type of study design; therefore, the investigators have listed the study as a single arm. In reality, this study will have 4 wedges, each containing randomized clusters of 4-5 hospitals.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Active InterventionActive comparatorBehavioral: Quality improvementThis stepped-wedge cluster randomized evaluation will randomly allocate 18 hospitals into 4 groups to receive our active intervention at different sequential time points according to the randomly assigned stepped-wedge schedule. Hospitals will function as control hospitals until it is their turn to receive the active intervention, according to the stepped wedge schedule. Each wedge consists of 4-5 hospitals and will last 5 months.
Control HospitalsNo interventionThis stepped-wedge cluster randomized evaluation will randomly allocate 18 hospitals into 4 groups to receive our active intervention at different sequential time points according to the randomly assigned stepped-wedge schedule. Hospitals will function as control hospitals until it is their turn to receive the active intervention, according to the stepped wedge schedule. Each wedge consists of 4-5 hospitals and will last 5 months.
  • Quality improvement (Behavioral): The primary intervention in this project will be a multi-faceted quality improvement plan targeting improved predictions of neurological outcome and survival after cardiac arrest.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Effective knowledge strategy [Two years]: Our primary endpoint measures the uptake of appropriate neurological prognostication in survivors of cardiac arrest. We define appropriate neurological prognostication as the number of patients that have appropriate prognostic testing (as recommended by Advanced Life Support/ILCOR guidelines) performed before death but occurring at least 72 hours after the cardiac arrest; the denominator for this endpoint is the total number of patients admitted to hospital following cardiac arrest excluding deaths unrelated to predictions of poor neurological prognosis.

Secondary outcomes

  • Qualitative Aim [Two years]: To understand reasons for premature termination of life sustaining therapy and barriers to evidence based neurological prognostication in survivors of cardiac arrest.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients =/> 18 years of age
* Non-traumatic out of hospital cardiac arrest
* Sustained return of spontaneous circulation (palpable pulse for > 20 minutes)
* Comatose (i.e. without full neurological recovery; non-responsive to verbal commands)
* Surviving to at least 6 hours after emergency department arrival

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients who die within 6 hours of emergency department arrival

+Publications

  • Results publication: Scales DC, Golan E, Pinto R, Brooks SC, Chapman M, Dale CM, Jichici D, Rubenfeld GD, Morrison LJ; Strategies for Post-Arrest Resuscitation Care Network. Improving Appropriate Neurologic Prognostication after Cardiac Arrest. A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Nov 1;194(9):1083-1091. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0397OC. PMID 27115286

+Investigators

My Notes