A Phase 3 Multi-center Study to Assess PET Imaging of Flurpiridaz F 18 Injection in Patients With CAD.

NCT01347710 — Phase 3, Completed, 795 participants, Lantheus Medical Imaging

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Phase 3, Open Label, Multicenter Study for the Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging of Flurpiridaz F18 Injection in Patients With Suspected or Known Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

RegistryNCT01347710
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional; na, single group, masking: none, diagnostic
Enrollment795 (Actual)
SponsorLantheus Medical Imaging (Industry)
ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease
InterventionsFlurpiridaz F18, 99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin) (Drug)
Datesstart 2011-06-01, primary completion 2013-07-01, completion 2013-09-01, first posted 2011-05-04, last updated 2020-11-24
Locations81 sites in United States, Canada, Finland, Puerto Rico

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Coronary Artery Disease All trials of Flurpiridaz F18 All trials of 99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin)

-Summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the diagnostic efficacy (specificity and sensitivity) of flurpiridaz F18 injection PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) compared to single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPI in the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) as defined by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or a documented history of Myocardial Infarction (MI).

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The study will assess the diagnostic efficacy (sensitivity and specificity) of Flurpiridaz F18 Injection MPI against SPECT MPI in patients screened for CAD as determined by ICA. Six hundred and eighty evaluable patients will be enrolled and will undergo SPECT MPI and Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI. Patients will be considered for enrollment if they are scheduled to undergo or have undergone prior ICA without intervention (being either positive or negative for CAD).

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Flurpiridaz F18ExperimentalDrug: Flurpiridaz F18; Drug: 99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin)Open-label study of a single dose of Flurpiridaz F18 injection for PET MPI compared to a single dose of 99mTc sestamibi or tetrofosmin for SPECT MPI in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease referred for coronary catheterization
  • Flurpiridaz F18 (Drug), also known as flurpiridaz F 18: Injection of Flurpiridaz F18 for the purposes of PET myocardial profusion imaging (MPI) analysis
  • 99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin) (Drug), also known as 99mTc sestamibi or 99mTc Tetrofosmin: Injection of 99mTc sestamibi or tetrofosmin for the purposes of SPECT MPI analysis

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F 18 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) Sensitivity Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Sensitivity [60 days]: Diagnostic efficacy of one day rest and stress flurpiridaz F 18 PET MPI sensitivity versus SPECT MPI sensitivity in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) by majority rule using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard,
  • Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz PET MPI Specificity Versus SPECT MPI Specificity [60 days]: Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz PET MPI specificity versus SPECT MPI specificity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard

Secondary outcomes

  • Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI Sensitivity Versus SPECT MPI Sensitivity in Subgroups: Pharmacologic Stress, Females and BMI>/=30. [60 days]: Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI sensitivity versus SPECT MPI sensitivity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard, , in subgroups: pharmacologic stress, females and BMI >/=30. Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard I
  • Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI Specificity Versus SPECT Specificity in Subgroups: Pharmacologic Stress, Females and BMI>/=30. [60 days]: Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI specificity versus SPECT specificity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard, in subgroups: pharmacologic stress, females and BMI >/=30. Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard
  • Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Localization of CAD for Sensitivity (PETVsSPECT). [60 days]: Overall sensitivity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI in coronary territories (Qualitative Diagnosis vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard (angiographic stenosis greater than or equal to 50% stenosis and confirmed MI); left descending coronary artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), right coronary artery (RCA), and non - LAD. Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard
  • Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Localization of CAD for Specificity (PETVsSPECT). [60 days]: Overall specificity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI in Coronary Territories (Qualitative Diagnosis) vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard (angiographic stenosis greater than or equal to 50% stenosis and confirmed MI); left descending coronary artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), right coronary artery (RCA), and non - LAD. Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard
  • Diagnositic Performance Evaluation of Multivessel Disease (PETvsSPECT). [60 days]: Overall summary of sensitivity for identifying multi-vessel disease between flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard (angio >/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard
  • Diagnositic Performance Evaluation of Multivessel Disease (PETvsSPECT). [60 days]: Overall summary of specificity for identifying multi-vessel disease between flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. majority rule (angio >/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard
  • Overall Summary of Sensitivity of PET MPI vs SPECT MPI; Image Quality Excellent or Good [60 days]: Overall summary of sensitivity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI (qualitative image quality of excellent or good) vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard(angio >/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard
  • Overall Summary of Specificity of PET MPI vs SPECT MPI; Image Quality of Excellent or Good [60 days]: Overall summary of specificity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI (qualitative, image quality excellent or good) vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs truth standard (angio >/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard
  • Image Quality of Rest and Stress (PET vs SPECT). [60 days]: Overall summary of rest and stress image quality for flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule. Value represents the number of subject images evaluated as excellent/good and fair/poor
  • Diagnostic Certainty in PET MPI and SPECT MPI [60 days]: Overall summary of diagnostic certainty in flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

Invasive Coronary Angiography. Men or Women age 18 or older - see protocol for additional details.

Exclusion Criteria:

Women who are pregnant, lactating, or of child bearing potential who are not practicing birth control.

Unstable cardiac status. History of coronary artery bypass graft. History of percutaneous coronary intervention within the past six months. See protocol for additional details.

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneFlurpiridaz F 18
Started795
Completed764
Not completed31

Outcome results

  • Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F 18 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) Sensitivity Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Sensitivity (Primary), Number, Proportion of true positive cases: Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI .719 (.670 to .763) (p <0.001)
  • Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI Sensitivity Versus SPECT MPI Sensitivity in Subgroups: Pharmacologic Stress, Females and BMI>/=30. (Secondary), Number, proportion of true postives: Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI 0.736 (.679 to .785) (p <0.001)
  • Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI Specificity Versus SPECT Specificity in Subgroups: Pharmacologic Stress, Females and BMI>/=30. (Secondary), Number, proportion of true negatives: Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI .773 (.720 to .819) (p 0.891)
  • Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Localization of CAD for Sensitivity (PETVsSPECT). (Secondary), Number, Proportion of true positives: Flurpiridaz F 18 .495 (.430 to .561) (p <0.001)
  • Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Localization of CAD for Specificity (PETVsSPECT). (Secondary), Number, proportion of true negatives: Flurpiridaz F 18 .867 (.835 to .893) (p .379)
  • Diagnositic Performance Evaluation of Multivessel Disease (PETvsSPECT). (Secondary), Number, proportion of true positives: Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI .410 (.340 to .484) (p <0.001)
  • Diagnositic Performance Evaluation of Multivessel Disease (PETvsSPECT). (Secondary), Number, proportion of true negatives: Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI .882 (.853 to .906) (p 0.827)
  • Overall Summary of Sensitivity of PET MPI vs SPECT MPI; Image Quality Excellent or Good (Secondary), Number, proportion of true positives: Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI .711 (.658 to .759) (p <0.001)
  • Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz PET MPI Specificity Versus SPECT MPI Specificity (Primary), Number, Proportion of true negatives: Flurpiridaz F18 .762 (.718 to .801) (p .945)
  • Overall Summary of Specificity of PET MPI vs SPECT MPI; Image Quality of Excellent or Good (Secondary), Number, proportion of true negatives: Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI .769 (.721 to .811) (p 0.954)
  • Image Quality of Rest and Stress (PET vs SPECT). (Secondary), Number, percent of images: Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI .891 (p <0.001)
  • Diagnostic Certainty in PET MPI and SPECT MPI (Secondary), Number, proportion of patients: Flurpiridaz F 18 0.862 (p <0.001)

Adverse events

Time frame: Adverse events occurring from the time of flurpiridaz F 18 rest administration through 14-17 day safety follow up

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Flurpiridaz F 18020/795 (2.5%)555/795 (69.8%)

Serious adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemFlurpiridaz F 18
Angina PectorisCardiac disorders6/795
Atrial FlutterCardiac disorders1/795
Cardiac Failure CongestiveCardiac disorders1/795
Cardiogenic ShockCardiac disorders1/795
Ventricular TachycardiaCardiac disorders2/795
Inguinal HerniaGastrointestinal disorders1/795
Catheter Site HaemorrhageGeneral disorders1/795
Non-Cardiac Chest PainGeneral disorders1/795
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/795
HypoglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/795
DizzinessNervous system disorders1/795
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/795
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/795
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/795
Pulmonary EmbolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/795
HypotensionVascular disorders1/795
Peripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseVascular disorders1/795

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemFlurpiridaz F 18
Angina PectorisCardiac disorders119/795
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders44/795
FatigueGeneral disorders70/795
Non-Cardiac Chest PainGeneral disorders58/795
Electrocardiogram ST Segment DepressionsInvestigations75/795
DizzinessNervous system disorders43/795
HeadacheNervous system disorders129/795
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders200/795
FlushingVascular disorders60/795
Percutaneous coronary interventionSurgical and medical procedures72/795

+Locations (81)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Cardiology Associates of Mobile, Inc.Mobile, AlabamaUnited States
Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd.Scottsdale, ArizonaUnited States
West Side Medical Associates of Los AngelesBeverly Hills, CaliforniaUnited States
USC PET Imaging Science CenterLos Angeles, CaliforniaUnited States
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos Angeles, CaliforniaUnited States
VA West Los Angeles Medical CenterLos Angeles, CaliforniaUnited States
UCLALos Angeles, CaliforniaUnited States
Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care SystemPalo Alto, CaliforniaUnited States
Cardiovascular Consultants Medical GroupPleasant Hill, CaliforniaUnited States
Northern California PET Imaging Center-Palo AltoSacramento, CaliforniaUnited States
VA San Diego Healthcare SystemSan Diego, CaliforniaUnited States
UCSF Medical CenterSan Francisco, CaliforniaUnited States
Yale UniversityNew Haven, ConnecticutUnited States
Alfieri CardiologyNewark, DelawareUnited States
Christiana Care Health SystemNewark, DelawareUnited States
Elite Research and Clinical TrialsAventura, FloridaUnited States
Independent Imaging, LLCBoynton Beach, FloridaUnited States
Coastal Cardiology Consultants dba The Heart & Vascular Institute of FloridaClearwater, FloridaUnited States
Florida Heart AssociatesFort Myers, FloridaUnited States
St. Luke's Cardiology AssociatesJacksonville, FloridaUnited States
The Cardiovascular Center, PALake Mary, FloridaUnited States
Florida Hospital/Cardiovascular Institute (Florida Heart Group)Orlando, FloridaUnited States
South Florida Research SolutionsPembroke Pines, FloridaUnited States
Memorial Hospital of TampaTampa, FloridaUnited States
Georgia Health Sciences Univ/Med College of GAAugusta, GeorgiaUnited States
South Coast Imaging CenterSavannah, GeorgiaUnited States
Gateway Cardiology, PCJerseyville, IllinoisUnited States
Norton Cardiovascular AssociatesLouisville, KentuckyUnited States
Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest LouisianaShreveport, LouisianaUnited States
Maine Research AssociatesAuburn, MaineUnited States
Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore, MarylandUnited States
Mass General Hospital (MGH)Boston, MassachusettsUnited States
Boston University Medical CenterBoston, MassachusettsUnited States
University of Michigan Health SystemAnn Arbor, MichiganUnited States
Wayne State University - Harper University HospitalDetroit, MichiganUnited States
Henry Ford HospitalDetroit, MichiganUnited States
St. Mary's Healthcare (Trinity Health)Grand Rapids, MichiganUnited States
McLaren MacombMount Clemens, MichiganUnited States
William Beaumont HospitalRoyal Oak, MichiganUnited States
Hattiesburg ClinicHattiesburg, MississippiUnited States
Missouri Cardiovascular Specialists, LLPColumbia, MissouriUnited States
Cardiovascular Imaging Technologies (CVIT)Kansas City, MissouriUnited States
Saint Louis University School of MedicineSt Louis, MissouriUnited States
Washington University School of MedicineSt Louis, MissouriUnited States
Las Vegas RadiologyLas Vegas, NevadaUnited States
Mount Sinai Medical CenterNew York, New YorkUnited States
Columbia University Medical CenterNew York, New YorkUnited States
St. Francis HospitalRoslyn, New YorkUnited States
Montefiore Medical CenterThe Bronx, New YorkUnited States
University of CincinnatiCincinnati, OhioUnited States
The Ohio State UniversityColumbus, OhioUnited States
OhioHealth Research InstituteColumbus, OhioUnited States
Kettering Medical CenterKettering, OhioUnited States
Pinnacle Health Cardiovascular Institute/ Associated CardiologistsHarrisburg, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Allegheny General HospitalPittsburgh, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Presbyterian University HospitalPittsburgh, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Berks Cardiologists, Ltd.Wyomissing, PennsylvaniaUnited States
York Hospital /Wellspan HealthYork, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Rhode Island HospitalProvidence, Rhode IslandUnited States
Medical University of South CarolinaCharleston, South CarolinaUnited States
Wellmont CVA Heart InstituteKingsport, TennesseeUnited States
Center for Biomedical ResearchKnoxville, TennesseeUnited States
Cardiovascular Research of Knoxville - St. Mary's Health Care System, Inc.Knoxville, TennesseeUnited States
Vanderbilt Heart and Vascular InstituteNashville, TennesseeUnited States
Dallas VA Medical CenterDallas, TexasUnited States
University of Texas Medical BranchGalveston, TexasUnited States
Excel Diagnostics and Nuclear Oncology CenterHouston, TexasUnited States
Katy CardiologyKaty, TexasUnited States
West Houston Area Clinical Trial Consultants, LLCTomball, TexasUnited States
University of Virginia Health SystemCharlottesville, VirginiaUnited States
McGuire Veteran Affairs Medical CenterRichmond, VirginiaUnited States
Carilion Cardiology ClinicRoanoke, VirginiaUnited States
Roanoke Heart InstituteRoanoke, VirginiaUnited States
University of Western OntarioLondon, OntarioCanada
KMH Cardiology and Diagnostic and MRI CentresMississauga, OntarioCanada
University of Ottawa Heart InstituteOttawa, OntarioCanada
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS)Sherbrooke, QuebecCanada
Helsinki University HospitalHelsinkiFinland
Turku PET CentreTurkuFinland
San Patricio MEDFLIX (San Patricio MRI & CT Center)GuaynaboPuerto Rico
VA Caribbean Healthcare SystemSan JuanPuerto Rico

+Publications

  • Results publication: Lopez DM, Huck DM, Divakaran S, Brown JM, Weber BN, Lemley M, Builoff V, Shanbhag A, Lan Z, Buckley C, Al-Mallah MH, Dorbala S, Blankstein R, Slomka P, Di Carli MF. Utility of 18F-Flurpiridaz PET Relative Flow Reserve in Differentiating Obstructive From Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Nov;18(11):e018323. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018323. Epub 2025 Oct 9. PMID 41064867
  • Results publication: Poitrasson-Riviere A, Moody JB, Renaud JM, Hagio T, Arida-Moody L, Buckley CJ, Al-Mallah MH, Nallamothu BK, Weinberg RL, Ficaro EP, Murthy VL. Integrated myocardial flow reserve (iMFR) assessment: optimized PET blood flow quantification for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Dec;51(1):136-146. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06455-2. Epub 2023 Oct 9. PMID 37807004
  • Results publication: Hagio T, Moody JB, Poitrasson-Riviere A, Renaud JM, Pierce L, Buckley C, Ficaro EP, Murthy VL. Multi-center, multi-vendor validation of deep learning-based attenuation correction in SPECT MPI: data from the international flurpiridaz-301 trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Mar;50(4):1028-1033. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06045-8. Epub 2022 Nov 19. PMID 36401636
  • Results publication: Maddahi J, Lazewatsky J, Udelson JE, Berman DS, Beanlands RSB, Heller GV, Bateman TM, Knuuti J, Orlandi C. Phase-III Clinical Trial of Fluorine-18 Flurpiridaz Positron Emission Tomography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 28;76(4):391-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.063. PMID 32703509

+Investigators