TrialReader


A Study In Patients With Neuropathic Pain From Post-Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

NCT00619476 — Phase 2, Completed, 376 participants, XenoPort, Inc.

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Study PXN110748: An Efficacy and Safety Study of XP13512 Compared With a Concurrent Placebo Control in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain Associated With Post-herpetic Neuralgia (PHN)

RegistryNCT00619476
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 2
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: triple, treatment
Enrollment376 (Actual)
SponsorXenoPort, Inc. (Industry)
ConditionsNeuralgia, Postherpetic
InterventionsGEn 1200mg/day, GEn 2400mg/day, GEn 3600mg/day, Placebo (Drug)
Datesstart 2008-02-01, primary completion 2009-07-01, completion 2009-07-01, first posted 2008-02-21, last updated 2013-07-22
Locations83 sites in United States, Canada

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Neuralgia, Postherpetic All trials of GEn 1200mg/day All trials of GEn 2400mg/day

-Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether gabapentin enacarbil (XP13512/GSK1838262), hereafter referred to as GEn is effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN).

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The primary purpose of study PXN110748 was to evaluate efficacy and safety of 3 fixed doses of GEn in the treatment of PHN.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorDrug: Placeboplacebo
GEn 1200mg/dayExperimentalDrug: GEn 1200mg/daygabapentin enacarbil 1200mg/day, maintenance treatment 14 weeks
GEn 2400mg/dayExperimentalDrug: GEn 2400mg/daygabapentin enacarbil 2400mg/day, maintenance treatment 14 weeks
GEn 3600mg/dayExperimentalDrug: GEn 3600mg/daygabapentin enacarbil 3600mg/day, maintenance treatment 14 weeks
  • GEn 1200mg/day (Drug), also known as XP13512/GSK1838262, gabapentin enacarbil: gabapentin enacarbil 1200mg/day
  • GEn 2400mg/day (Drug), also known as XP13512/GSK1838262, gabapentin enacarbil: gabapentin enacarbil 2400mg/day
  • GEn 3600mg/day (Drug), also known as gabapentin enacarbil, XP13512/GSK1838262: gabapentin enacarbil 3600mg/day
  • Placebo (Drug): placebo

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Change From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the End of Maintenance Treatment (EOMT) Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: Baseline and EOMT values are the calculated means of the daily 24-hour API scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization (Baseline) and the earliest date of Week 13 visit/Withdrawal visit/last dose of study drug (EOMT). Participants used a hand-held diary to rate their average pain intensity over the preceding 24 hours, using an 11-point PI-Numerical Rating Scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). LOCF was used if less than 4 days of diary data were provided. Change from baseline was calculated as EOMT score minus Baseline score.

Secondary outcomes

  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: Night-time is defined as the time between going to bed at night and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time API on a daily basis in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline wss calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Current Morning Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity "right now." Participants recorded their current morning pain intensity in the morning upon wakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: Night-time worst pain is defined as the participant's assessment of their worst pain between going to bed at night and rising in the morning. Participants recorded night-time worst pain in the morning upon awakening using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Sleep Interference Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: Participants assessed sleep interference due to pain on a daily basis using the 11-point NRS (0=pain does not interfere with sleep, 10=pain completely interferes with sleep). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Average Pain Intensity(API) Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: Day-time is defined as the time between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time API on a daily basis in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Current Evening Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: Current pain is defined as the participant's assessment of pain intensity "right now." Participants recorded their current evening pain intensity in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: Day-time worst pain is defined as the participant's assessment of their worst pain between rising in the morning and going to bed at night. Participants recorded day-time worst pain in the evening before bedtime using an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
  • Change From Baseline in Pain Quality as Assessed by the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) Summary Scores at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: The NPS assesses pain qualities and consists of 11-items, 10 assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact to 10=greatest impact); and 1 open-ended question not used in score calculation. 4 summary scores are calculated: NPS 10 (items 1-7, 9-11), NPS 8 (8 pain descriptor items), NPS Non-Allodynic (NA) (8 NA items), and NPS 4 (4 pain quality items); and range from 0 to 100 (0=no impact and 100=greatest impact). The analysis is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
  • Change From Baseline in Pain Characteristics and Intensity as Assessed by the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: The SF-MPQ, a general pain instrument, assesses the characteristics and intensity of pain and consists of 15-items assessed on a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe). 3 summary scores are calculated: sensory score (sum of items 1-11, range 0-33), affective score (sum of items 12-15, range 0-12), total score (sum of items 1-15, range 0-45), where lower scores = lower pain/impact. Analysis is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
  • Change From Baseline in Dynamic Allodynia at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: Dynamic allodynia (pain in response to a standardized light touch stimulus, a foam brush applied with light pressure to the site of maximum pain) was assessed by an 11-point PI-NRS (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
  • Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire at EOMT Using LOCF Data [EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: The PGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the participant's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved." EOMT response is defined as the score recorded at the Week13/Withdrawal visit.
  • Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: Baseline and EOMT scores are the calculated means of the 24-hour average pain scores for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization and EOMT, respectively. Percent reduction from baseline was calculated as the \[(EOMT score minus the baseline score)divided by the baseline score\], multiplied by 100. The PI-NRS is an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine) by which a participant assesses their 24-hour average pain intensity.
  • Time to Onset of Sustained Improvement in the 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score [Anytime post-baseline until date of last dose of study medication (up to Week 13)]: Sustained improvement in the 24-hour average pain intensity score is defined as at least 2 consecutive days on which the 24-hour average pain intensity score is >=2 points less than the mean 24-hour average pain intensity score at baseline. Time to onset is measured from baseline and was calculated as the first day of event minus the last day of baseline and is expressed in days. Baseline score is the calculated mean of the 24-hour average pain score for each participant during the last 7 days prior to randomization.
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Dose in Milligrams of Rescue Medication at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (Week 13 or early withdrawal)]: Mean daily use of rescue medication (milligrams of acetaminophen) was calculated by determining the average number of tablets taken per day of rescue medication (Commerical Tylenol) during treatment and multiplying that by 500 mg. Baseline and EOMT are as defined for the primary endpoint. Change from baseline was calculated as the EOMT score minus the baseline score. An ANCOVA model with baseline value, BMI, grouped center as covariates was used.
  • Change From Baseline in Severity of Pain and the Impact of Pain as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: The BPI, a general pain instrument, assesses the severity and interference of pain; and consists of 6 items assessed on an 11-point NRS (0=no impact and 10=greatest impact). 2 summary scores are calculated: BPI Severity Score (average of first 4 items) and BPI Interference Score (average of 7 responses to item 6); where each summary score ranges from 0 to 10 (0=no impact and 10=greatest impact). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
  • Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the SF-36 at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: The SF-36 is a general health-related quality of life instrument consisting of 36 items with various response options (Yes/No, 5- to 6-point Likert scale). Summary scores are calculated for 8 domains and 2 components (physical and mental); where scores range from 0 to 100 (higher scores = better quality of life). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
  • Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the POMS-B at EOMT Using LOCF Data [Baseline and EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: The POMS-B, an emotional functioning instrument, assesses mood, tension, and other psychological symptoms and consists of 30-items assessed on a 5-point scale (0=not at all to 4=extremely). 6 summary scores are calculated: Tension/Anxiety, Depression/Rejection, Anger/Hostility, Vigor/Activity, Fatigue/Inertia, and Confusion/Bewilderment; and range from 0-20 (higher scores = more negative mood state). Analysis of this endpoint is based on the change from baseline (BL) (EOMT score minus the BL score) using an ANCOVA model with BL value, BMI, grouped center as covariates.
  • Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire at EOMT Using LOCF Data [EOMT (representing the earliest date of Week 13 visit/withdrawal visit)]: The CGIC is a single-item questionnaire designed to provide an overall assessment of treatment from the clinician's perspective since the start of the study. It is measured on a 7-point scale, where 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse. A participant is considered a responder if they have a response of "very much improved" or "much improved." EOMT response is defined as the score recorded at the Week13/Withdrawal visit.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* 18 years or older
* Female subjects are eligible if of non-childbearing potential or not lactating, has a negative pregnancy, and agrees to use one a specified highly effective method for avoiding pregnancy
* Documented medical diagnosis of PHN of with pain present for at least three months from the healing of a herpes zoster rash
* Baseline 24-hour average pain intensity score ≥ 4.0 based on an 11-point PI-NRS
* Provides written informed consent in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

* Other chronic pain conditions not associated with PHN. However, the subject will not be excluded if:
* The pain is located at a different region of the body; and
* The pain intensity is not greater than the pain intensity of the PHN; and
* The subject can assess PHN pain independently of other pain
* Is unable to discontinue prohibited medications or non-drug therapies or procedures throughout the duration of the study
* Hepatic impairment defined as ALT or AST > 2x upper limit of normal (ULN), or alkaline phosphatase or bilirubin > 1.5x ULN
* Chronic hepatitis B or C
* Impaired renal function defined as creatinine clearance <60 mL/min or requiring hemodialysis
* Corrected QT (QTc) interval ≥ 450 msec or QTc interval ≥480 msec for patients with Bundle Branch Block
* Uncontrolled hypertension at screen (sitting systolic >160 mmHg and/or sitting diastolic >90 mmHg)
* Current diagnosis of active epilepsy or any active seizure disorder requiring chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs
* Medical condition or disorder that would interfere with the action, absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of GEn, or, in the investigator's judgment
* Is considered to be clinically significant and may pose a safety concern, or,
* Could interfere with the accurate assessment of safety or efficacy, or,
* Could potentially affect a subject's safety or study outcome
* Meets criteria defined by the DSM-IV-TR for a major depressive episode or for active significant psychiatric disorders within last year
* Depression in remission, with or without antidepressant treatment, may participate, unless stable antidepressant regimen is a prohibited medication
* Antidepressant medication may not be changed or discontinued to meet entry criteria and must be stable for at least three months prior to enrollment
* History of clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse (DSM-IV-TR) or is unable to refrain from substance abuse throughout the study. Benzodiazepines or atypical benzodiazepines as hypnotic sleep agents permitted.
* Currently participating in another clinical study in which the subject is, or will be exposed to an investigational or non-investigational drug or device
* Has participated in a clinical study and was exposed to investigational or non-investigational drug or device:
* Within preceding month for studies unrelated to PHN, or
* Within preceding six months for studies related to PHN
* Treated previously with GEn
* History of allergic or medically significant adverse reaction to investigational products (including gabapentin) or their excipients, acetaminophen or related compounds

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestonePlaceboGEn 1200 mg/DayGEn 2400 mg/DayGEn 3600 mg/Day
Started951078490
Intent-to-treat population951078287
Safety population951078287
Completed64856056
Not completed31222434

Outcome results

  • Change From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at the End of Maintenance Treatment (EOMT) Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Data (Primary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -1.66 +/- 0.216; GEn 1200 mg/Day -2.47 +/- 0.204; GEn 2400 mg/Day -2.36 +/- 0.237; GEn 3600 mg/Day -2.72 +/- 0.227 (p 0.013)
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Average Pain Intensity (API) Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -1.65 +/- 0.219; GEn 1200 mg/Day -2.35 +/- 0.206; GEn 2400 mg/Day -2.44 +/- 0.238; GEn 3600 mg/Day -2.50 +/- 0.231
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Current Morning Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -1.34 +/- 0.223; GEn 1200 mg/Day -2.29 +/- 0.209; GEn 2400 mg/Day -2.13 +/- 0.242; GEn 3600 mg/Day -2.41 +/- 0.234
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Night-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -1.76 +/- 0.239; GEn 1200 mg/Day -2.49 +/- 0.225; GEn 2400 mg/Day -2.65 +/- 0.260; GEn 3600 mg/Day -2.71 +/- 0.252
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Sleep Interference Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -2.04 +/- 0.225; GEn 1200 mg/Day -2.72 +/- 0.212; GEn 2400 mg/Day -2.58 +/- 0.245; GEn 3600 mg/Day -2.78 +/- 0.237
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Average Pain Intensity(API) Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -1.59 +/- 0.218; GEn 1200 mg/Day -2.47 +/- 0.206; GEn 2400 mg/Day -2.23 +/- 0.239; GEn 3600 mg/Day -2.67 +/- 0.229
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Current Evening Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -1.45 +/- 0.225; GEn 1200 mg/Day -2.45 +/- 0.213; GEn 2400 mg/Day -2.24 +/- 0.247; GEn 3600 mg/Day -2.69 +/- 0.236
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Day-time Worst Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -1.74 +/- 0.242; GEn 1200 mg/Day -2.61 +/- 0.229; GEn 2400 mg/Day -2.41 +/- 0.265; GEn 3600 mg/Day -2.82 +/- 0.253
  • Change From Baseline in Pain Quality as Assessed by the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) Summary Scores at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -17.17 +/- 2.094; GEn 1200 mg/Day -22.78 +/- 1.907; GEn 2400 mg/Day -24.02 +/- 2.256; GEn 3600 mg/Day -25.2 +/- 2.202
  • Change From Baseline in Pain Characteristics and Intensity as Assessed by the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -6.08 +/- 0.949; GEn 1200 mg/Day -8.35 +/- 0.869; GEn 2400 mg/Day -7.45 +/- 1.024; GEn 3600 mg/Day -8.15 +/- 1.006
  • Change From Baseline in Dynamic Allodynia at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -2.29 +/- 0.150; GEn 1200 mg/Day -1.97 +/- 0.137; GEn 2400 mg/Day -2.16 +/- 0.161; GEn 3600 mg/Day -2.25 +/- 0.161
  • Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Number, participants: Placebo 24; GEn 1200 mg/Day 45; GEn 2400 mg/Day 35; GEn 3600 mg/Day 39
  • Number of Participants Achieving Various Levels of Percent Reduction From Baseline in the Mean 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Number, participants: Placebo 79; GEn 1200 mg/Day 94; GEn 2400 mg/Day 71; GEn 3600 mg/Day 84
  • Time to Onset of Sustained Improvement in the 24-hour Average Pain Intensity Score (Secondary), Median, days: Placebo 49 (2 to 86); GEn 1200 mg/Day 27 (1 to 96); GEn 2400 mg/Day 10 (1 to 79); GEn 3600 mg/Day 10 (1 to 67)
  • Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Dose in Milligrams of Rescue Medication at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, milligrams: Placebo -41.00 +/- 89.488; GEn 1200 mg/Day -289.94 +/- 84.350; GEn 2400 mg/Day -260.03 +/- 97.853; GEn 3600 mg/Day -266.21 +/- 93.503
  • Change From Baseline in Severity of Pain and the Impact of Pain as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -1.8 +/- 0.22; GEn 1200 mg/Day -2.4 +/- 0.20; GEn 2400 mg/Day -2.4 +/- 0.24; GEn 3600 mg/Day -2.5 +/- 0.24
  • Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by the SF-36 at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo 3.3 +/- 0.74; GEn 1200 mg/Day 4.3 +/- 0.67; GEn 2400 mg/Day 4.4 +/- 0.79; GEn 3600 mg/Day 4.9 +/- 0.78
  • Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the POMS-B at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Least squares mean, points on a scale: Placebo -1.6 +/- 0.29; GEn 1200 mg/Day -1.8 +/- 0.26; GEn 2400 mg/Day -2.0 +/- 0.30; GEn 3600 mg/Day -2.0 +/- 0.30
  • Number of Participants Who Are Responders on the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Questionnaire at EOMT Using LOCF Data (Secondary), Number, participants: Placebo 21; GEn 1200 mg/Day 38; GEn 2400 mg/Day 34; GEn 3600 mg/Day 33

Adverse events

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Placebo02/95 (2.1%)63/120 (52.5%)
GEn 1200 mg/Day00/107 (0.0%)75/107 (70.1%)
GEn 2400 mg/Day06/82 (7.3%)64/82 (78.0%)
GEn 3600 mg/Day02/87 (2.3%)71/87 (81.6%)

Serious adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemPlaceboGEn 1200 mg/DayGEn 2400 mg/DayGEn 3600 mg/Day
Intracranial AneruysmNervous system disorders0/950/1071/820/87
Multiple SclerosisNervous system disorders0/950/1071/820/87
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders1/950/1070/820/87
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders0/950/1070/821/87
Chest PainGeneral disorders0/950/1071/820/87
SinusitisInfections and infestations0/950/1071/820/87
Vascular InjuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/950/1070/820/87
Blood Pressure IncreasedInvestigations0/950/1071/820/87
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders0/950/1071/820/87
CystoceleReproductive system and breast disorders0/950/1070/821/87

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemPlaceboGEn 1200 mg/DayGEn 2400 mg/DayGEn 3600 mg/Day
DizzinessNervous system disorders14/12018/10721/8226/87
SomnolenceNervous system disorders8/12011/1079/8212/87
HeadacheNervous system disorders9/12011/1078/826/87
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders5/1209/1073/828/87
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders5/1207/1074/824/87
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders5/1206/1072/826/87
FatigueGeneral disorders1/1205/1074/829/87
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations5/1205/1073/825/87
Edema PeripheralGeneral disorders0/1206/1076/825/87
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/1206/1074/823/87
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders2/1203/1074/826/87
Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations3/1208/1072/821/87
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/1204/1074/822/87
Weight IncreasedInvestigations1/1203/1074/824/87
Dry MouthGastrointestinal disorders2/1201/1074/824/87
HypertensionCardiac disorders1/1202/1074/822/87
Nasal CongestionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1202/1070/825/87
Vision BlurredEye disorders0/1202/1074/822/87
FlatulanceGastrointestinal disorders0/1201/1071/824/87
Joint SprainInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1202/1070/824/87
TremorNervous system disorders0/1200/1070/824/87

+Locations (83)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
GSK Investigational SiteBirmingham, AlabamaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteNorthport, AlabamaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteChandler, ArizonaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteGilbert, ArizonaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteLitchfield Park, ArizonaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteScottsdale, ArizonaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteTucson, ArizonaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteLittle Rock, ArkansasUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteArcadia, CaliforniaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteHuntington Park, CaliforniaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteNew Port Beach, CaliforniaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteNorthridge, CaliforniaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteOxnard, CaliforniaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteRedondo Beach, CaliforniaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteRiverside, CaliforniaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteSan Diego, CaliforniaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteSan Francisco, CaliforniaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteSanta Monica, CaliforniaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteBoulder, ColoradoUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteBradenton, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteBradenton, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteDaytona Beach, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteHallandale, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteHollywood, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteNaranja, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteNew Port Richey, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteOcala, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteSt. Petersburg, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteTallahassee, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteTampa, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteTampa, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteTampa, FloridaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteDecatur, GeorgiaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteMarietta, GeorgiaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteChicago, IllinoisUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteLibertyville, IllinoisUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteDanville, IndianaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteElkhart, IndianaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteTerre Haute, IndianaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteShreveport, LouisianaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteRockville, MarylandUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteBoston, MassachusettsUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteBingham Farms, MichiganUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteOlive Branch, MississippiUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteKansas City, MissouriUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteSt Louis, MissouriUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteReno, NevadaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteLebanon, New HampshireUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteAlbuquerque, New MexicoUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteAmherst, New YorkUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteBrooklyn, New YorkUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteNew York, New YorkUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteNew York, New YorkUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteRochester, New YorkUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteCharlotte, North CarolinaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteGreensboro, North CarolinaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteHickory, North CarolinaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteHigh Point, North CarolinaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteSalisbury, North CarolinaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteWinston-Salem, North CarolinaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteCincinnati, OhioUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteNorman, OklahomaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteOklahoma City, OklahomaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteEugene, OregonUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteMedford, OregonUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteAltoona, PennsylvaniaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteSan Antonio, TexasUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteWeber City, VirginiaUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteTacoma, WashingtonUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteWenatchee, WashingtonUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteYakima, WashingtonUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteMilwaukee, WisconsinUnited States
GSK Investigational SiteKelowna, British ColumbiaCanada
GSK Investigational SiteBrampton, OntarioCanada
GSK Investigational SiteLondon, OntarioCanada
GSK Investigational SiteNiagara Falls, OntarioCanada
GSK Investigational SiteThornhill, OntarioCanada
GSK Investigational SiteToronto, OntarioCanada
GSK Investigational SiteMontreal, QuebecCanada
GSK Investigational SiteQuébec, QuebecCanada
GSK Investigational SiteSaint Romuald, QuebecCanada
GSK Investigational SiteSherbrooke, QuebecCanada
GSK Investigational SiteTrois-Rivières, QuebecCanada

+Investigators

  • GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline

My Notes