Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Initiated Clinical Decision Support in Hospitalist Practice

NCT07889063 — Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, 20 participants, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Three-Arm Randomized Feasibility Trial of AI-Initiated Clinical Decision Support in Routine Hospitalist Practice

RegistryNCT07889063
StatusNot yet recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, health services research
Enrollment20 (Estimated)
SponsorCedars-Sinai Medical Center (Other)
ConditionsClinical Decision Support
InterventionsAI Clinical Decision Support: Automated EHR Data Retrieval, AI Clinical Decision Support: Admission H&P Note (Other)
Datesstart 2026-10-01 (estimated), primary completion 2027-10-01 (estimated), completion 2027-10-01 (estimated), first posted 2026-10-22, last updated 2026-10-22
Locations2 sites in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Clinical Decision Support All trials of AI Clinical Decision Support: Automated EHR Data Retrieval All trials of AI Clinical Decision Support: Admission H&P Note

-Summary

This study will evaluate the feasibility of using artificial intelligence (AI)-generated clinical decision support during routine inpatient hospital medicine care. Participating hospitalist physicians may receive AI-generated recommendations for eligible hospitalized patients under their care. Eligible patient cases will be randomly assigned to one of three AI prompting strategies that differ in the clinical information provided to the AI system. After reviewing each recommendation, participating physicians will complete a brief survey assessing the clinical usefulness of the recommendation, how they interpreted it, and whether it was or will be incorporated into patient management.

The study will assess whether AI-generated recommendations can be successfully generated and delivered during routine clinical care and whether physicians complete the study surveys and adopt the recommendations. It will also provide preliminary information about physicians' perceptions of AI-generated recommendations across the three prompting strategies. The findings will be used to inform the design of a future larger randomized trial of AI-initiated clinical decision support.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

This is a three-arm randomized feasibility trial evaluating AI-initiated clinical decision support in routine inpatient hospital medicine practice. Eligible patient cases cared for by participating hospitalist physicians will be randomized to one of three AI prompting strategies: automated electronic health record (EHR) data retrieval, automated EHR data retrieval with explicit inclusion of the admission history and physical (H\&P) note, or the admission H\&P note alone. OpenEvidence will generate a clinical decision support recommendation for each randomized case.

The recommendation will be delivered to the attending hospitalist, who will then complete a brief electronic survey assessing the clinical utility and interpretation of the recommendation and whether it was implemented or planned for implementation. The study will assess the feasibility of generating and delivering AI-initiated recommendations during routine clinical care, physician survey completion, timely survey completion, and recommendation adoption. Findings from this feasibility trial will inform the design of a future larger randomized trial.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Arm D: Automated Electronic Health Record Data Retrieval OnlyExperimentalOther: AI Clinical Decision Support: Automated EHR Data RetrievalArm D (Data Retrieval Only): Eligible patient cases assigned to this arm will have the OpenEvidence recommendation generated using automated electronic health record (EHR) data retrieval without explicit inclusion of the admission history and physical (H\&P) note.
Arm DH: Automated EHR Data Retrieval + Admission H&P NoteExperimentalOther: AI Clinical Decision Support: Automated EHR Data Retrieval; Other: AI Clinical Decision Support: Admission H&P NoteArm DH (Data Retrieval + History and Physical): Eligible patient cases assigned to this arm will have the OpenEvidence recommendation generated using automated EHR data retrieval with explicit inclusion of the admission H\&P note.
Arm H: Admission H&P Note OnlyExperimentalOther: AI Clinical Decision Support: Admission H&P NoteArm H (History and Physical Only): Eligible patient cases assigned to this arm will have the OpenEvidence recommendation generated using the admission H\&P note only, without automated EHR data retrieval.
  • AI Clinical Decision Support: Automated EHR Data Retrieval (Other): OpenEvidence generates an AI-based clinical decision support recommendation using automated retrieval of available EHR data.
  • AI Clinical Decision Support: Admission H&P Note (Other): The admission H\&P note is explicitly provided to OpenEvidence as clinical context for generation of the AI-based clinical decision support recommendation.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Successful AI Recommendation Delivery Rate [Within 24 hours of hospital admission]: Proportion of randomized patient cases in which an AI-generated recommendation is successfully delivered to the attending hospitalist.
  • Physician Survey Completion Rate [Within 48 hours after AI recommendation delivery]: Proportion of successfully delivered AI-generated recommendations for which the attending hospitalist completes the electronic physician survey.
  • Timely Physician Survey Completion Rate [Within 12 hours of AI recommendation delivery]: Proportion of successfully delivered AI-generated recommendations for which the attending hospitalist completes the electronic physician research survey within 12 hours of recommendation delivery.
  • Recommendation Adoption Rate [Within 48 hours after AI recommendation delivery]: Proportion of AI-generated recommendations that the attending hospitalist reports as implemented or planned for implementation. Responses will be recorded separately as implemented, planned but not yet implemented, or not adopted.

Secondary outcomes

  • Physician-Perceived Clinical Utility [Within 48 hours after AI recommendation delivery]: Physician-perceived clinical utility of the AI-generated recommendation, assessed at the patient-case level using a single-item 0-10 numeric rating scale, with anchors at 0 ("Not at all useful"), 5 ("Moderately useful"), and 10 ("Extremely useful").
  • Interpretation of AI-Generated Recommendations [Within 48 hours after AI recommendation delivery]: Physician interpretation of the AI-generated recommendation, assessed using six predefined response categories in the physician research survey.
  • Physician-Reported Recommendation Adoption Status [Within 48 hours after AI recommendation delivery]: Physician-reported adoption of the AI-generated recommendation, categorized as implemented, planned but not yet implemented, or not adopted.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* Age 18 years or older.
* Attending physician providing inpatient hospital medicine care at a participating Cedars-Sinai Health System site.
* Expected to provide clinical care during the study period.
* Willing and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Declines to provide or withdraws informed consent.
* Not actively providing attending-level inpatient care on a participating hospitalist service during the study period.
* Unable to complete study procedures.

+Locations (2)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos Angeles, CaliforniaUnited States
Huntington HospitalPasadena, CaliforniaUnited States

+Investigators