The Efficiency of Dynamic Versus Traditional Core Strengthening Exercise in Pain Relief, Core Stability, and Functional Mobility in Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain.
| Registry | NCT07884396, acronym CNLBP |
|---|---|
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | Not applicable |
| Study type | Interventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, treatment |
| Enrollment | 70 (Actual) |
| Sponsor | University of Lahore (Other) |
| Conditions | Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain |
| Interventions | Routine Physiotherapy, Dynamic Core Strengthening Exercises, Traditional Core Strengthening Exercises (Behavioral) |
| Dates | start 2025-12-15, primary completion 2026-04-14, completion 2026-04-28, first posted 2026-10-20, last updated 2026-10-20 |
| Locations | 1 site in Pakistan |
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain All trials of Routine Physiotherapy All trials of Dynamic Core Strengthening Exercises
This research investigated the effectiveness of two different types of core strengthening exercises: dynamic versus traditional exercises. The participants comprised of individuals aged between 20-50 years, who have been suffering from chronic nonspecific low back pain for more than 12 weeks. The sample comprised of 70 participants, who were divided into two groups using random sampling. Group 1 performed dynamic core strengthening exercises, while Group 2 performed traditional core strengthening exercises. These two groups received routine physiotherapy, and were treated three times a week for a period of 8 weeks. The pain, back-related disability and assessment of lumbosacral stability was performed at the start and 8 weeks after the treatment using the Visual Analogue Scale, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Prone Instability Test, respectively. The aim of the study was to find out which of the two core strengthening exercise programs offered the participants more pain relief, and more improvement in lumbosacral stability and back-related disability.
Chronic non-specific low back pain can limit mobility and function in daily life. Core strengthening is often a component included in rehabilitation practices. Dynamic and traditional core strengthening methodologies can differ, however, their effectiveness when used in rehabilitation is comparably untested. The effects of dynamic and traditional core strengthening on pain, disability and lumbar stability were the primary focuses of this study.
In this module, we describe results from an open-label, randomised, two-arm, parallel-group, superiority trial on 70 adults from the general population. An equal number of participants in the two arms of the study (dynamic versus traditional core strengthening) was also offered routine physiotherapy. Each intervention was delivered three times a week for eight weeks. All participants were assessed for pain, disability and lumbar stability at baseline and at week 8. The assessments used were the Visual Analogue Scale, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Prone Instability Test. Analyses were conducted to determine differences between the study arms and assess clinically meaningful changes.
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynamic Core Strengthening | Experimental | Behavioral: Routine Physiotherapy; Behavioral: Dynamic Core Strengthening Exercises | Participants first received routine physiotherapy. This was then supplemented by assisted exercises for progressive dynamic core strengthening. During these exercises, participants alternated movements of the upper and lower limbs while in a four-point kneeling position. This treatment occurred three times per week for eight weeks. |
| Traditional Core Strengthening | Active comparator | Behavioral: Routine Physiotherapy; Behavioral: Traditional Core Strengthening Exercises | Participants received standard physiotherapy and then strengthening exercises that were progressive in nature. These included bridging and straight leg raising. This treatment was completed over three supervised sessions per week for eight weeks. |
Sex: All, ages: 20 Years to 50 Years
Inclusion Criteria: * Age between 20-50 * Chronic non-specific low back pain for more than 12 weeks * Male or female * Voluntary participation with a signed informed consent * Ability to follow instructions of the prescribed exercises Exclusion Criteria: * Low back pain with a specific cause (i.e. fracture, tumor, infection, or back pain due to other inflammatory diseases) * History of any spinal surgery * Presence of severe neurological deficits * Pregnancy * Presence of severe cardiovascular or systemic diseases * Cognitive impairment or inability to perform the prescribed exercises and follow instructions safely
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Lahore | Lahore, Punjab Province | Pakistan |