Transradial Band Combined With Adrenaline Drops Versus Transradial Band Alone for Radial Artery Hemostasis After Cardiac Catheterization: Randomized Controlled Trial
| Registry | NCT07877922 |
|---|---|
| Status | Not yet recruiting |
| Phase | Not applicable |
| Study type | Interventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment |
| Enrollment | 110 (Estimated) |
| Sponsor | Burapha University (Other) |
| Conditions | Radial Artery Hemostasis |
| Interventions | Transradial band with adrenaline drops, Transradial band alone (Drug, device) |
| Dates | start 2026-10-15 (estimated), primary completion 2026-12-31 (estimated), completion 2026-12-31 (estimated), first posted 2026-10-16, last updated 2026-10-16 |
| Locations | 1 site in Thailand |
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Radial Artery Hemostasis All trials of Transradial band with adrenaline drops All trials of Transradial band alone
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of a transradial band combined with adrenaline drops versus a transradial band alone for achieving radial artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization. Adult patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through the radial artery will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. The primary objective is to determine whether the addition of adrenaline drops reduces the time required for complete transradial band deflation while maintaining effective hemostasis. Secondary outcomes include radial artery occlusion and hematoma formation. The study hypothesis is that the combination of a transradial band and adrenaline drops will shorten hemostasis time without increasing complications compared with the standard transradial band alone.
Transradial access has become the preferred vascular access route for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention because it is associated with lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications, earlier patient ambulation, improved patient comfort, and reduced healthcare costs compared with transfemoral access. However, achieving effective hemostasis after radial artery sheath removal remains an important aspect of post-procedural care. Excessive compression may increase the risk of radial artery occlusion, whereas inadequate compression may lead to bleeding and hematoma formation.
The TR Band is widely used for radial artery hemostasis following transradial cardiac catheterization. Adrenaline possesses local vasoconstrictive properties and may enhance hemostasis at the puncture site, potentially reducing the duration of compression required to achieve complete hemostasis. However, evidence regarding the adjunctive use of topical adrenaline with TR Band compression after transradial cardiac catheterization is limited.
This study is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted at Burapha University Hospital, Thailand. Adult patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through transradial access will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either:
Transradial Band combined with adrenaline drops (intervention group) Transradial Band alone (control group)
After completion of the cardiac catheterization procedure and sheath removal, hemostasis will be achieved according to the study protocol. In the intervention group, adrenaline drops will be applied at the radial artery puncture site before TR Band compression. In the control group, standard TR Band compression alone will be used.
The primary objective is to determine whether the addition of adrenaline drops reduces the time required for complete TR Band deflation while maintaining effective hemostasis. Secondary objectives include evaluation of radial artery occlusion and hematoma formation.
The investigators hypothesize that the combination of a Transradial Band and adrenaline drops will shorten the duration of radial compression and facilitate earlier hemostasis without increasing vascular complications compared with standard Transradial Band compression alone.
The findings of this study may provide evidence for a simple, inexpensive, and easily applicable strategy to improve post-procedural management after transradial cardiac catheterization.
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transradial band alone | Active comparator | Device: Transradial band alone | Participants randomized to this control arm will receive a Transradial Band alone for radial artery hemostasis after removal of the radial artery sheath. The Transradial Band will be managed according to the study protocol, with gradual deflation until complete deflation is achieved without bleeding or oozing. |
| Transradial band with adrenaline drops | Experimental | Drug: Transradial band with adrenaline drops | Participants randomized to this intervention arm will receive adrenaline drops applied to the radial artery puncture site followed by application of a Transradial Band for radial artery hemostasis after removal of the radial artery sheath. The Transradial Band will be managed according to the study protocol, with gradual deflation until complete deflation is achieved without bleeding or oozing |
Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 100 Years
Inclusion Criteria: Patients over 18 years of age who scheduled for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with sheath larger than 6-F in diameter * long-term oral anticoagulation continued during the procedure * Ipsilateral arteriovenous fistula * Clinical instability * Barbeau class D on radial plethysmography * Known vascular disease or deformity of the forearm * History of RAO at base line * Had developed vascular complications from the procedure * Failed to establish radial access
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burapha University Hospital | Chon Buri | Thailand |