Empirical Anatomy-Based Ablation vs Emphasize Map-Guided Substrate Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation : (COMPASS-AF)

NCT07726901 — Not applicable, Recruiting, 360 participants, Samsung Medical Center

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT07726901, acronym COMPASS-AF
StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, treatment
Enrollment360 (Estimated)
SponsorSamsung Medical Center (Other); collaborators: Asan Medical Center, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Korea University Anam Hospital
ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation (AF)
InterventionsAnatomy-based ablation, Emphasize map-guided ablation (Procedure)
Datesstart 2026-05-19, primary completion 2030-12-31 (estimated), completion 2030-12-31 (estimated), first posted 2026-07-24, last updated 2026-07-24
Locations2 sites in South Korea

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) All trials of Anatomy-based ablation All trials of Emphasize map-guided ablation

-Summary

This study is aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of two different catheter ablation strategies in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Participants will be randomized 1:1 into either the Anatomy-based group or the Emphasize map-guided group

* Anatomy-based group : Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using pulsed-field ablation (PFA) with a single-shot multielectrode catheter.
* Emphasize map-guided group : PVI using radiofrequency (RF) ablation followed by additional EnSite X-guided pathologic substrate modification.

Participants will be followed for 1 year to compare the incidence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia and other clinical parameters between the two groups.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is increasingly being adopted in clinical practice due to its advantages in shortening procedure times and reducing the incidence of complications. While the majority of PFA-related research has focused on PVI-centric strategies, recent studies have reported that posterior wall isolation (PWI) using PFA can also be performed safely. However, sufficient clinical evidence regarding the efficacy of additional ablation strategies beyond PVI in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has yet to be established.

The Emphasize mapping system, a software feature within the EnSite X platform, is designed to simultaneously visualize Voltage maps, Peak frequency, and CFAE-related information. Unlike the individual analysis of each parameter, this integrated approach allows for a more precise identification of electrophysiologically significant pathologic substrates by evaluating the complex characteristics of electrical signals holistically. Currently, however, Emphasize-guided ablation is technically limited to the use of radiofrequency (RF) energy.

Persistent AF is characterized by complex and heterogeneous mechanisms, meaning a single, uniform ablation strategy may not yield consistent clinical outcomes across all patients. Consequently, it is hypothesized that an individualized substrate ablation strategy guided by functional mapping may be more effective than a conventional, empirical anatomy-based approach.

Therefore, this study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of an empirical anatomy-based ablation strategy using PFA versus an individualized Emphasize map-guided substrate ablation strategy in patients with persistent AF.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Anatomy-based groupActive comparatorProcedure: Anatomy-based ablation
Emphasize map-guided groupExperimentalProcedure: Emphasize map-guided ablation
  • Anatomy-based ablation (Procedure): In the empirical anatomy-based ablation strategy group, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) will be performed using pulsed-field ablation (PFA) with a single-shot multielectrode catheter. For each pulmonary vein, approximately 4-10 pulse applications will be delivered depending on the catheter position, with each application consisting of several seconds of pulse delivery. The catheter will be positioned around the PV ostia, and electrical isolation will be achieved by utilizing various catheter configurations as necessary. The energy settings and application methods for PFA in this study will follow the manufacturer's recommended protocols and established methods from prior clinical studies. Additionally, the creation of supplementary lesion sets is permitted at the operator's discretion.
  • Emphasize map-guided ablation (Procedure): In the Emphasize map-guided substrate ablation group, ablation will be performed using a contact force-sensing irrigated radiofrequency (RF) catheter. Following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), an Emphasize map will be acquired during atrial fibrillation (AF) using the EnSite X mapping system. Based on this map, electrophysiologically significant pathologic substrates will be evaluated, and additional substrate ablation will be performed. Subsequently, electrical cardioversion will be conducted to restore sinus rhythm. If sinus rhythm is not maintained or if AF is re-induced, an additional Emphasize map may be acquired in the right atrium (RA), and RA substrate ablation can be performed if necessary.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia [From 3 months to 12 months after the index procedure]: Any documented atrial tachyarrhythmias excluding the initial 3-month blanking period. Documented atrial tachyarrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia) were defined as follows: * Atrial tachyarrhythmias documented in 12 lead ECG * Atrial tachyarrhythmias of more than 30 seconds in Holter monitoring Recorded as a binary outcome (presence or absence of recurrence)

Secondary outcomes

  • Atrial fibrillation burden [From 3 months to 12 months after the index procedure]: The proportion of time spent in atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter during rhythm monitoring .The burden will be assessed as percent(%) using Holter monitoring.
  • Repeat ablation [From index procedure to 12 months]: Any additional catheter ablation procedure performed after the index procedure for documented recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia during the follow-up period.
  • Use of antiarrhythmic drug therapy [From 3 months to 12 months after the index procedure]: Percentage of patients prescribed any Class I or Class III antiarrhythmic Temporary use during the blanking period (first 3 months) will not be counted.
  • Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-life (AFEQT) questionnaire score [From index procedure to 12 months]: The AFEQT is outcome instrument designed to measure the impact of AF on a patient's health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life
  • Stroke [From index procedure to 12 months]: Proportion of participants experiencing a new focal or global neurological deficit lasting ≥24 hours with imaging evidence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Transient ischemic attack will not be included.
  • Cardiovascular hospitalization [From index procedure to 12 months]: Proportion of participants experiencing hospitalization primarily due to a cardiovascular cause, including: * Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence * Heart failure exacerbation * Acute coronary syndrome * Cardiovascular procedural complications
  • Bleeding event [From index procedure to 12 months]: Proportion of participants experiencing bleeding events. Bleeding event will be classified according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis(ISTH) criteria: * Major bleeding * Clinically relevant non-major bleeding
  • All-cause mortality [From index procedure to 12 months]: Death due to any cause occurring during the follow-up period.
  • Procedure-related complications [From index procedure to 30days]: Proportion of participants experiencing any complication occurring during or within 30 days after the index procedure, including: * Cardiac tamponade * Vascular access complication * Pulmonary vein stenosis * Esophageal injury * Phrenic nerve injury * Major bleeding.
  • Procedure time [at the index procedure]: Total procedure time measured in minutes from vascular access puncture to removal of all catheters at the end of the procedure.
  • Radiation time [at the index procedure]: Total fluoroscopy exposure time measured in minutes.
  • Left atrial reservoir strain [From index procedure to 12 months]: Measured as percentage by echocardiography

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 19 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Adults aged 19 years or older who have voluntarily provided written informed consent to participate in the study
* Patients diagnosed with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who are scheduled to undergo catheter ablation for AF.

Exclusion Criteria:

* History of prior catheter ablation or MAZE surgery for atrial fibrillation.
* Left atrial (LA) diameter exceeding 60 mm.
* Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
* History of prior open-heart surgery.
* Women who are pregnant, lactating, or of childbearing potential.
* Heart failure corresponding to New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV.
* Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) experienced within the past 3 months.
* Patients with terminal illness and a life expectancy of less than one year.
* Any other condition that the investigator deems inappropriate for participation in the study.

+Locations (2)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Samsung Medical CenterSeoul, SeoulSouth KoreaNot yet recruiting
Samsung Medical CenterSeoul, SeoulSouth KoreaRecruiting

+Publications

  • Results publication: Al-Aidarous S, Horrach CV, Roney C, Butcher C, Hunter RJ, Honarbakhsh S. Peak frequency can be effectively used to characterize scar in atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Jan 9;6(4):434-443. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.12.011. eCollection 2025 Apr. PMID 40321733
  • Results publication: Honarbakhsh S, Horrach CV, Lambiase PD, Roney C, Hunter RJ. The effect of fixed and functional remodelling on conduction velocity, wavefront propagation, and rotational activity formation in atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2024 Oct 3;26(10):euae239. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae239. PMID 39283961
  • Results publication: Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P; STAR AF II Investigators. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1812-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408288. PMID 25946280
  • Results publication: Yang G, Zheng L, Jiang C, Fan J, Liu X, Zhan X, Li J, Wang L, Yang H, Zhu W, Du H, Ma G, Ma W, Kojodjojo P, Chen M; STABLE-SR-II Investigators. Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Plus Low-Voltage Area Modification in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The STABLE-SR-II Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Jul;8(7):882-891. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Apr 27. PMID 35863814
  • Results publication: Huo Y, Gaspar T, Schonbauer R, Wojcik M, Fiedler L, Roithinger FX, Martinek M, Purerfellner H, Kirstein B, Richter U, Ulbrich S, Mayer J, Krahnefeld O, Agdirlioglu T, Zedda A, Piorkowski J, Piorkowski C. Low-Voltage Myocardium-Guided Ablation Trial of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. NEJM Evid. 2022 Nov;1(11):EVIDoa2200141. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2200141. Epub 2022 Oct 19. PMID 38319851
  • Results publication: Reddy VY, Gerstenfeld EP, Schmidt B, Nair D, Natale A, Saliba W, Verma A, Sommer P, Metzner A, Turagam M, Weiner S, Champagne J, Garcio-Bolao I, Calkins H, Olson J, Issa Z, Winner M, Su W, Tomassoni G, Kim J, Hook B, Delurgio DB, Gibson DN, Daccarett M, Patel C, Bhalla K, Shehata M, Harding JD, Cheung JW, Raybuck JD, Roelke S, Schwartz T, Sutton BS, Mansour M; ADVANTAGE-AF Investigators. Pulsed Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Results of ADVANTAGE AF. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 May 6;85(17):1664-1678. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.03.515. PMID 40306839
  • Results publication: Casula M, Scajola LV, Quilico F, Pasotti B, Cesarano E, Sanzo A, Savastano S, Rordorf R. Posterior left atrial wall isolation for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation during first-time catheter ablation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2025 Mar 1;422:132987. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.132987. Epub 2025 Jan 12. PMID 39809414
  • Results publication: Ibrahim AA, Elaraby A, Almaadawy O, Abuelazm M, Hassan AR, Bakr A, Husain MA, Elsayed H, Abdelazeem B. Adjunctive left atrial posterior wall isolation for atrial fibrillation: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug;47(8):1108-1123. doi: 10.1111/pace.15035. Epub 2024 Jul 5. PMID 38967398
  • Results publication: Kistler PM, Chieng D, Sugumar H, Ling LH, Segan L, Azzopardi S, Al-Kaisey A, Parameswaran R, Anderson RD, Hawson J, Prabhu S, Voskoboinik A, Wong G, Morton JB, Pathik B, McLellan AJ, Lee G, Wong M, Finch S, Pathak RK, Raja DC, Sterns L, Ginks M, Reid CM, Sanders P, Kalman JM. Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPLA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Jan 10;329(2):127-135. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.23722. PMID 36625809
  • Results publication: DeLurgio DB, Crossen KJ, Gill J, Blauth C, Oza SR, Magnano AR, Mostovych MA, Halkos ME, Tschopp DR, Kerendi F, Taigen TL, Shults CC, Shah MH, Rajendra AB, Osorio J, Silver JS, Hook BG, Gilligan DM, Calkins H. Hybrid Convergent Procedure for the Treatment of Persistent and Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Results of CONVERGE Clinical Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Dec;13(12):e009288. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009288. Epub 2020 Nov 13. PMID 33185144
  • Results publication: Terricabras M, Verma A. Is pulmonary vein isolation enough for persistent atrial fibrillation? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;31(8):2148-2153. doi: 10.1111/jce.14381. Epub 2020 Feb 14. PMID 32022320
  • Results publication: Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d'Avila A, de Groot NMSN, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):e275-e444. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 12. No abstract available. PMID 28506916
  • Results publication: Lee S-R, Kim D, Lee SH, Lim W-H, Chun KJ, Choe W-S, Ahn H-J, Lee K-Y, Choi J, Kim B-S, et al. Atrial fibrillation fact sheet in Korea 2024 (part 1): epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in Korea. International Journal of Arrhythmia. 2024;25:13. doi: 10.1186/s42444-024-00119-4