To Study Lower Dose of Cyclophosphamide After Stem Cell Transplant for Blood Cancers

NCT07719946 — Phase 2, Recruiting, 20 participants, Tata Memorial Centre

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Phase II Trial of Reduced Dose Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Hematological Malignancies

RegistryNCT07719946
StatusRecruiting
PhasePhase 2
Study typeInterventional; na, single group, masking: none, prevention
Enrollment20 (Estimated)
SponsorTata Memorial Centre (Other); collaborators: Indian Council of Medical Research
ConditionsHaploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant, Hematological Malignancies
InterventionsCyclophosphamide (Drug)
Datesstart 2025-03-26, primary completion 2028-11-12 (estimated), completion 2028-11-12 (estimated), first posted 2026-07-22, last updated 2026-07-22
Locations2 sites in India

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant All trials for Hematological Malignancies All trials of Cyclophosphamide

-Summary

Cyclophosphamide is the name of a medicine given to prevent graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) after half-matched transplant. This medicine is given on the 3rd and 4th day after stem cell transplant. The standard dose of this medicine is 50 mg per kg of the patient's weight given on the 3rd and the 4th day. However, using this medicine at this dose of 50 mg / kg for 2 days is associated with certain problems such as susceptibility to infections and delay in the recovery of the immune system after stem cell transplant. Therefore, several research groups across the world have tried to reduce the dose of cyclophosphamide that is used. These groups have tried reducing the dose from 50 mg per kg to 25-40 mg per kg. These studies have shown that the reduced dose cyclophosphamide is equally effective in preventing GVHD. However, these studies are carried out on small numbers of patients and further studies are essential to confirm whether reduced dose of cyclophosphamide is equally effective. In this study, we will use cyclophosphamide at a lower dose (25 mg/kg x 2 days) and see if the lower dose results in equal efficacy but lesser toxicities This is a single-arm study. All participants will receive the same treatment; there is no comparison group.

Participants will:

Adults (age ≥18) undergoing haploidentical stem cell transplant for blood cancers Receive low-dose cyclophosphamide (25 mg/kg/day) on Day 3 and Day 4 after transplant Also receive standard GVHD preventive medicines (calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate) Undergo regular blood tests, immune system monitoring, and GVHD assessments Have immune cell and cytokine profiles analyzed through blood samples

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Background: Allogeneic Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is often the only curative treatment option for patients with end stage hematological malignancies. Haploidentical HSCT is increasingly being adopted worldwide due to ease of access to donors. Post transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has revolutionized the way the world does T cell replete haploidentical transplant. However, the success of PTCy comes at the cost of delayed engraftment and increased organ toxicities. Reduced dose of PTCy may be equally effective in GvHD prevention and translate into better engraftment kinetics and immune reconstitution Objectives: To evaluate the GvHD prophylactic effect of reduced dose PTCy in combination with Calcineurin inhibitors and MMF for haploidentical HSCT.

Novelty: The proposed study is a prospective phase 2 trial of reduced dose PTCy as GvHD prophylaxis in haplo HSCT. By demonstration of equal GvHD prevention efficacy of reduced dose PTCy this study would provide the base for phase 3 randomised trial and provide practice changing answers.

Study treatment:

Post-transplant Immunosuppression:

● GvHD prophylaxis regimen will consist of two doses of cyclophosphamide on D+3 and D+4 at 25mg/kg/day (that is half of the usual standard dose) with calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil / mycophenolate sodium. Mesna will be given with cyclophosphamide (this is standard of care). The use of calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil / mycophenolate sodium will be as per standard practice.

Administration of study treatments

* Hydration and MESNA
* Adequate intravenous hydration with normal saline will be started at least 4 hours prior to cyclophosphamide, and will be continued till 24 hours post completion of 2nd dose of cyclophosphamide as per standard institutional practice.
* Mesna will be administered as a continuous infusion starting from Day+3 till 24 hours after the second dose of PTCy.
* Cyclophosphamide
* Cyclophosphamide would be administered on D+3 and D+4 \[first dose starting between 60 - 72 hrs after stem cell infusion\] at a dose of 25 mg/kg/day intravenously as an intravenous infusion over 2 hrs. The timing of cyclophosphamide and the infusion time of 2 hours are standard of care. The actual administered dose can be rounded off to the nearest 100 mg (Eg if the dose is 1760 mg, the actual administered dose can be 1800 mg)
* Study treatment: Cyclophosphamide.
* Dosage: 25 mg/kg/day.
* Dosage schedule: Day+3 and Day+4 of transplant.
* Route/Mode of administration: Intravenous infusion over 2 hrs with Mesna. Assessment Plan (All the below assessments are according to standard institutional protocols and policies. These are not specific for this study)
* The day of neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment will be captured.
* Donor chimerism will be assessed by FISH\[XX/XY\] in case of sex mismatched transplants and with VNTR chimerism studies on day +14, day +28 and monthly thereafter for 1 year. Additional chimerism studies can be done if clinically indicated
* aGvHD grading will be determined by the investigator as per Modified Glucksberg criteria on a weekly basis for the first 100 days and every 28 days thereafter, as well as at scheduled study visits on Days 100, 180, and 365 and at the end of treatment. Additional assessments will be done if clinically indicated. Assessment of acute GVHD is primary clinical with additional investigations if deemed necessary. These time points are same as that followed in clinical practice and no extra study-specific assessments are needed.
* Chronic GVHD will be diagnosed and graded based on NIH and Seattle consensus criteria. The time to onset of limited and extensive chronic GVHD will also be recorded.
* Adverse events will be assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0 from the time of cyclophosphamide till day +30.
* Immune Reconstitution will be assessed at Day+30, Day+60, Day+90, Day+180 and Day +365. This assessment will be done by lymphocyte subset analysis and is being done for all transplant patients at the mentioned time point at our institute. These are not study specific but the same as what is followed in standard institutional practice.
* Cytokine analysis will be done at baseline, Day+1, Day+3, Day +5 and +7. These too are done as a standard practice for all haplo-identical transplants, and hence are not specific to the study.
* The days above assessments (not being study specific, but as usual in standard practice), can be adjusted according to patient's OPD follow up days to coincide with their routine blood collections. It may be noted that all BMT patients are followed up at least twice a week till 100 days (3 months) post BMT.

Characterization of immune cell profile using 16-color flow cytometry Peripheral blood samples will be studied for various immune cell subsets using the bulk-lyse and stain method. Antibody staining will be performed using a 16-color antibody panel and cells will be acquired on a BD LSR Fortessa flow cytometer. A minimum of 100000 cells will be studied in each panel. This panel will provide more than 100 immune cell subsets. Flow cytometry data will be analyzed using Kaluza software version 2.0 and tSNE software. The different immune cell subsets will be categorized. Absolute counts of these subsets will be calculated in PB samples with WBC counts using the dual-platform method.

Cytokine profile analysis Cytokine profile analysis for cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IP-10, GM-CSF, etc., will be performed using the patient's peripheral blood plasma samples (within 4 h of collection) using a bead-based immunoassay (CBA, BD Biosciences, and BioLegend's LEGENDplex™) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, 50 µL of prepared capture bead mixture will be mixed with 50 µL of the diluted sample and incubated at room temperature for 1.5 h. Then, 50 µL of the detection reagent will be added to this mixture and incubated for 1.5 h. The detection reagent is a mixture of analyte-specific antibodies conjugated to phycoerythrin. Incubation of the samples with capture beads and then the detection reagent leads to the formation of a "sandwich complex" of the three. These complexes will be acquired on LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences), and data will be analyzed using FCAP Array software (BD Biosciences) and LEGENDplex version 8.0 software (BioLegend).

Sample size Based on our historical data, the expected incidence of grades 3 and 4 aGvHD is estimated to be 30%. The study will enroll a total of 20 patients using a Simon 2-stage design. If in the initial 10 patients enrolled, 4 or more develop acute grade III or IV GVHD, then we will stop the study. If 3 or less patients develop acute grade III or IV GVHD, then we will complete the enrollment of the planned 20 patients. We expect to complete the enrollment in 4 years.

Statistical Analysis All continuous data will be expressed as median and IQR. Categorical data will be expressed as frequency and percentage. The incidence of acute and chronic GvHD, relapse, and NRM will be estimated based on cumulative incidence methods accounting for competing event (TRM or death due to any cause). Overall Survival and Relapse Free Survival probabilities will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

The platelet and neutrophil engraftment will be expressed using median and IQR. Statistical analysis will be performed by appropriate statistical tests using IBM SPSS v25 (statistical package for social sciences) software.

Study Timeline and Oversight

Duration: 4 years (estimated)

Site: Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC)

Sample size: 20 patients

Provision of ancillary care for unrelated illness during the duration of the study:

Allogeneic stem cell transplant is associated with development of several kinds of post-transplant complications. All such complications will be managed as per standard of care by the transplant team and as mentioned previously, the patient will bear the cost of such management.

Plan for Missing Data Predefined rules will be applied to classify missing, uninterpretable, or inconsistent data.

Privacy, confidentiality and anticipated consequences of breach of confidentiality:

All the study data will remain in a password protected document which will be accessible only to the study investigators and the regulatory authorities. In any presentation originating from the study or any publication, no reference will be made to individual patients. Any data presentation will always be de-identified.

The fact that the patient has undergone an allogeneic HSCT would be available / made known to several clinicians and other medical / paramedical staff who would be involved in patient care. Since there are no additional study specific assessments or follow ups, any breach of information about your trial participation is unlikely to have any consequences.

Compensation and reimbursement:

Transplant related complications (which may lead to fatal outcomes) are inherent complications of half-matched transplants. These could occur irrespective of trial participation. Therefore, the study does not have a provision for compensation (since these complications can occur irrespective of study participation). Also, because of the same reason, there is no reimbursement and the cost of management of complications will be borne by the patient.

All trial-related data will be collected in accordance with institutional standard operating procedures (SOPs).

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Low dose cyclosphosphamideExperimentalDrug: CyclophosphamideSingle Arm study and cyclophosphamide at a lower dose (25 mg/kg x 2 days)
  • Cyclophosphamide (Drug): Post-transplant Immunosuppression: ● GvHD prophylaxis regimen will consist of two doses of cyclophosphamide on D+3 and D+4 at 25mg/kg/day (that is half of the usual standard dose) with calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil / mycophenolate sodium. Mesna will be given with cyclophosphamide (this is standard of care). The use of calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil / mycophenolate sodium will be as per standard practice. Administration of study treatments * Hydration and MESNA * Adequate intravenous hydration with normal saline will be started at least 4 hours prior to cyclophosphamide, and will be continued till 24 hours post completion of 2nd dose of cyclophosphamide as per standard institutional practice. * Mesna will be administered as a continuous infusion starting from Day+3 till 24 hours after the second dose of PTCy. * Cyclophosphamide * Cyclophosphamide would be administered on D+3 and D+4 \[first dose starting between 60 - 72 hrs after stem cell infusion\]

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Severe (Grade 3-4) aGvHD [at day 100 Post Transplant]: To evaluate the cumulative incidence of severe (Grade 3-4) aGvHD

Secondary outcomes

  • Cumulative incidence of clinically significant (Grade 2-4) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) [Day 100 and Day 180 post-transplant]: To evaluate the cumulative incidence of clinically significant (Grade 2-4) acute GvHD following transplantation.
  • Cumulative incidence of severe (Grade 3-4) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) [Day 180 post-transplant]: To evaluate the cumulative incidence of severe (Grade 3-4) acute GvHD following transplantation.
  • Graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival (GRFS) [1 year post-transplant]: To evaluate graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival (GRFS). GRFS events include grade III or IV acute GvHD, extensive chronic GvHD, disease relapse, or death.
  • Incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD [1 year post-transplant]: To evaluate the cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD following transplantation.
  • Neutrophil engraftment [Up to Day 100 post-transplant]: To evaluate the time to neutrophil engraftment following transplantation, defined according to the study protocol.
  • Platelet engraftment [Up to Day 100 post-transplant]: To evaluate the time to platelet engraftment following transplantation, defined according to the study protocol.
  • Regimen-related toxicity [Up to Day 100 post-transplant]: To evaluate the incidence and severity of regimen-related toxicity following transplantation.
  • Transplant-related mortality (TRM) [1 year post-transplant]: To evaluate the cumulative incidence of transplant-related mortality following transplantation.
  • Overall survival (OS) [1 year post-transplant]: To evaluate overall survival following transplantation.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria: -

* Patients age ≥ 18 years
* ECOG performance score of 0 or 1

Exclusion Criteria: -

* Presence of an active uncontrolled infection defined as hemodynamic instability attributable to sepsis or new symptoms, worsening physical signs, or radiographic findings attributable to infection.
* Any medical or psychiatric illness which precludes the participant from giving informed consent.
* Organ function criteria: Serious organ dysfunctions:
* Serious cardiac dysfunction: Left ventricular ejection fraction < 45%; no uncontrolled arrhythmias or symptomatic cardiac disease.
* Serious pulmonary organ dysfunction: Symptomatic pulmonary disease; forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) =< 50% of predicted (corrected for haemoglobin).
* Serious renal dysfunction: Measured serum creatinine clearance =< 60 mL/min.
* Serious Hepatic dysfunction: Total serum bilirubin more than twice upper normal limit or Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) more than 3-fold higher than laboratory upper normal limits.

+Locations (2)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in CancerNavi Mumbai, MaharashtraIndiaNot yet recruiting
Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in CancerNavi Mumbai, MaharashtraIndiaRecruiting

+Publications

  • Results publication: Sugita J, Kamimura T, Ishikawa T, Ota S, Eto T, Kuroha T, Miyazaki Y, Kumagai H, Matsuo K, Akashi K, Taniguchi S, Harada M, Teshima T. Reduced dose of posttransplant cyclophosphamide in HLA-haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2021 Mar;56(3):596-604. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-01065-0. Epub 2020 Sep 24. PMID 32973350
  • Results publication: Nakamae H, Koh H, Katayama T, Nishimoto M, Hayashi Y, Nakashima Y, Nakane T, Nakamae M, Hirose A, Hino M. HLA haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation using reduced dose of posttransplantation cyclophosphamide for poor-prognosis or refractory leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Exp Hematol. 2015 Nov;43(11):921-929.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 15. PMID 26284307
  • Results publication: Meredith J. McAdams, Dimana Dimitrova, Jennifer L. Sadler, Seth M. Steinberg, Jennifer Cuellar-Rodriguez, Thomas E. Hughes, Nuri Cha, Ellen B. Carroll, Stephanie N. Hicks, Amy Chai, Scott Napier, Anita Stokes, Richard Kwan, Jennifer Sponaugle, Mustafa Hyder, Ronald E. Gress, Jennifer A. Kanakry, Chris G. Kanakry. Phase I Study De-Intensifying Exposure of Post Transplantation Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) after HLA Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) for Hematologic Malignancies. Transplant Cell Ther 27 3S (2021) S1-S488.
  • Results publication: Wachsmuth LP, Patterson MT, Eckhaus MA, Venzon DJ, Kanakry CG. Optimized Timing of Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in MHC-Haploidentical Murine Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Feb;26(2):230-241. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.09.030. Epub 2019 Oct 2. PMID 31586477
  • Results publication: Goldsmith SR, Abid MB, Auletta JJ, Bashey A, Beitinjaneh A, Castillo P, Chemaly RF, Chen M, Ciurea S, Dandoy CE, Diaz MA, Fuchs E, Ganguly S, Kanakry CG, Kanakry JA, Kim S, Komanduri KV, Krem MM, Lazarus HM, Liu H, Ljungman P, Masiarz R, Mulroney C, Nathan S, Nishihori T, Page KM, Perales MA, Taplitz R, Romee R, Riches M. Posttransplant cyclophosphamide is associated with increased cytomegalovirus infection: a CIBMTR analysis. Blood. 2021 Jun 10;137(23):3291-3305. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020009362. PMID 33657221
  • Results publication: Dulery R, Mohty R, Labopin M, Sestili S, Malard F, Brissot E, Battipaglia G, Mediavilla C, Banet A, Van de Wyngaert Z, Paviglianiti A, Belhocine R, Isnard F, Lapusan S, Adaeva R, Vekhoff A, Ledraa T, Legrand O, Cohen A, Bonnin A, Ederhy S, Mohty M. Early Cardiac Toxicity Associated With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. JACC CardioOncol. 2021 Jun 15;3(2):250-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.02.011. eCollection 2021 Jun. PMID 34396331
  • Results publication: Luznik L, O'Donnell PV, Symons HJ, Chen AR, Leffell MS, Zahurak M, Gooley TA, Piantadosi S, Kaup M, Ambinder RF, Huff CA, Matsui W, Bolanos-Meade J, Borrello I, Powell JD, Harrington E, Warnock S, Flowers M, Brodsky RA, Sandmaier BM, Storb RF, Jones RJ, Fuchs EJ. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jun;14(6):641-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.03.005. PMID 18489989
  • Results publication: Solomon SR, Sizemore CA, Sanacore M, Zhang X, Brown S, Holland HK, Morris LE, Bashey A. Total Body Irradiation-Based Myeloablative Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Unrelated Donor Transplantation in Patients Without Matched Sibling Donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jul;21(7):1299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 19. PMID 25797174
  • Results publication: Solomon SR, Sizemore CA, Sanacore M, Zhang X, Brown S, Holland HK, Morris LE, Bashey A. Haploidentical transplantation using T cell replete peripheral blood stem cells and myeloablative conditioning in patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies who lack conventional donors is well tolerated and produces excellent relapse-free survival: results of a prospective phase II trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Dec;18(12):1859-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.06.019. Epub 2012 Aug 1. PMID 22863841
  • Results publication: O'Donnell PV, Luznik L, Jones RJ, Vogelsang GB, Leffell MS, Phelps M, Rhubart P, Cowan K, Piantados S, Fuchs EJ. Nonmyeloablative bone marrow transplantation from partially HLA-mismatched related donors using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002;8(7):377-86. doi: 10.1053/bbmt.2002.v8.pm12171484. PMID 12171484
  • Results publication: Luznik L, Engstrom LW, Iannone R, Fuchs EJ. Posttransplantation cyclophosphamide facilitates engraftment of major histocompatibility complex-identical allogeneic marrow in mice conditioned with low-dose total body irradiation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002;8(3):131-8. doi: 10.1053/bbmt.2002.v8.pm11939602. PMID 11939602
  • Results publication: Luznik L, Jalla S, Engstrom LW, Iannone R, Fuchs EJ. Durable engraftment of major histocompatibility complex-incompatible cells after nonmyeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, low-dose total body irradiation, and posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Blood. 2001 Dec 1;98(12):3456-64. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.12.3456. PMID 11719388
  • Results publication: Eto M, Mayumi H, Tomita Y, Yoshikai Y, Nishimura Y, Maeda T, Ando T, Nomoto K. Specific destruction of host-reactive mature T cells of donor origin prevents graft-versus-host disease in cyclophosphamide-induced tolerant mice. J Immunol. 1991 Mar 1;146(5):1402-9. PMID 1671578
  • Results publication: Matsuura A, Katsuno M, Suzuki Y, Ito T, Yasuura K, Abe T, Yoshikai Y. Cyclophosphamide-induced tolerance in fully allogeneic heart transplantation in mice. Cell Immunol. 1994 May;155(2):501-7. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1994.1142. PMID 8181080
  • Results publication: Eto M, Mayumi H, Tomita Y, Yoshikai Y, Nishimura Y, Nomoto K. Sequential mechanisms of cyclophosphamide-induced skin allograft tolerance including the intrathymic clonal deletion followed by late breakdown of the clonal deletion. J Immunol. 1990 Sep 1;145(5):1303-10. PMID 2143514
  • Results publication: Mayumi H, Umesue M, Nomoto K. Cyclophosphamide-induced immunological tolerance: an overview. Immunobiology. 1996 Jul;195(2):129-39. doi: 10.1016/S0171-2985(96)80033-7. PMID 8877390
  • Results publication: Nirmul G, Severin C, Taub RN. Mechanisms and kinetics of cyclophosphamide-induced specific tolerance to skin allografts in mice. Transplant Proc. 1973 Mar;5(1):675-8. No abstract available. PMID 4572127
  • Results publication: Nirmul G, Severin C, Taub RN. Cyclophosphamide-induced immunologic tolerance to skin homografts. Surg Forum. 1971;22:287-8. No abstract available. PMID 4941317
  • Results publication: BERENBAUM MC, BROWN IN. DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIPS FOR AGENTS INHIBITING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. Immunology. 1964 Jan;7(1):65-71. PMID 14113077
  • Results publication: Strauss G, Osen W, Debatin KM. Induction of apoptosis and modulation of activation and effector function in T cells by immunosuppressive drugs. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002 May;128(2):255-66. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.01777.x. PMID 11985515
  • Results publication: Brodsky RA, Petri M, Smith BD, Seifter EJ, Spivak JL, Styler M, Dang CV, Brodsky I, Jones RJ. Immunoablative high-dose cyclophosphamide without stem-cell rescue for refractory, severe autoimmune disease. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Dec 15;129(12):1031-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-12-199812150-00007. PMID 9867758
  • Results publication: Emadi A, Jones RJ, Brodsky RA. Cyclophosphamide and cancer: golden anniversary. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov;6(11):638-47. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.146. Epub 2009 Sep 29. PMID 19786984
  • Results publication: Whirl-Carrillo M, McDonagh EM, Hebert JM, Gong L, Sangkuhl K, Thorn CF, Altman RB, Klein TE. Pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Oct;92(4):414-7. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.96. PMID 22992668
  • Results publication: Anasetti C, Amos D, Beatty PG, Appelbaum FR, Bensinger W, Buckner CD, Clift R, Doney K, Martin PJ, Mickelson E, et al. Effect of HLA compatibility on engraftment of bone marrow transplants in patients with leukemia or lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1989 Jan 26;320(4):197-204. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198901263200401. PMID 2643045
  • Results publication: Beatty PG, Clift RA, Mickelson EM, Nisperos BB, Flournoy N, Martin PJ, Sanders JE, Stewart P, Buckner CD, Storb R, et al. Marrow transplantation from related donors other than HLA-identical siblings. N Engl J Med. 1985 Sep 26;313(13):765-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198509263131301. PMID 3897863
  • Results publication: Powles RL, Morgenstern GR, Kay HE, McElwain TJ, Clink HM, Dady PJ, Barrett A, Jameson B, Depledge MH, Watson JG, Sloane J, Leigh M, Lumley H, Hedley D, Lawler SD, Filshie J, Robinson B. Mismatched family donors for bone-marrow transplantation as treatment for acute leukaemia. Lancet. 1983 Mar 19;1(8325):612-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91793-2. PMID 6131300