Laser-Based Map Tests in Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome

NCT07572942 — Recruiting, 35 participants, Balikesir University

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Validity and Reliability of Neuroscience-Based Visual Laser Feedback Map Tests in Individuals With Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome

RegistryNCT07572942
StatusRecruiting
Study typeObservational
Enrollment35 (Estimated)
SponsorBalikesir University (Other)
ConditionsMotoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome, Cognitive-Motor Interaction, Sensorimotor Performance
Datesstart 2026-04-15, primary completion 2026-04-28, completion 2026-07-15 (estimated), first posted 2026-05-07, last updated 2026-05-07
Locations1 site in Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome All trials for Cognitive-Motor Interaction

-Summary

This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of neuroscience-based visual laser feedback map tests in individuals with Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome (MCRS). The developed assessment protocol integrates visuospatial processing, reaction time, and upper extremity motor control within a single task. Construct validity will be examined through correlations with reaction time and proprioception measurements, and test-retest reliability will be assessed to determine measurement consistency.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome GroupCommunity-dwelling older adults aged 65 years and above diagnosed with Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome (MCRS) will be included. Participants will undergo neuroscience-based visual-laser feedback map tests along with reaction time and proprioception assessments under standardized conditions. No therapeutic intervention will be applied.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Visual-laser feedback map test performance [Baseline]: Performance parameters including completion time (seconds), reaction time (milliseconds), movement accuracy, and total performance score obtained from the figure-of-eight tracing and directional target tracking tasks.

Secondary outcomes

  • Reaction time [Baseline]: Reaction time will be assessed using the Light Trainer system. The response time to visual stimuli will be recorded in milliseconds.
  • Shoulder proprioception [Baseline]: Shoulder joint position sense will be assessed using the joint repositioning test. Absolute error will be recorded in degrees.
  • Test-retest reliability [Baseline and 7-day follow-up]: Test-retest reliability of the visual-laser feedback map tests will be evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).
  • Measurement error [Baseline and 7-day follow-up]: Measurement error will be calculated using the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC).

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 65 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

Aged ≥65 years Diagnosis of Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome (subjective cognitive complaint + slow gait) Living independently in the community Able to understand and perform test procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

Diagnosed dementia Severe psychiatric disorders Advanced visual impairments (e.g., macular degeneration, severe cataract) Neurological disorders affecting motor control Severe tremor or ataxia interfering with task performance

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Balikesir UniversityBalıkesir, BigadiçTurkey (Türkiye)Recruiting

+Publications

  • Pinzón-Ríos, I. D., & Moreno-Collazos, J. E. (2020). Neural aging, brain plasticity and exercise: Advances from a physiotherapy perspective. Archivos de Medicina (Manizales), 20(1), 188-202.
  • Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31. PMID 27330520
  • Shadmehr R, Krakauer JW. A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp Brain Res. 2008 Mar;185(3):359-81. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1280-5. Epub 2008 Feb 5. PMID 18251019
  • Moinuddin A, Goel A, Sethi Y. The Role of Augmented Feedback on Motor Learning: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2021 Nov 18;13(11):e19695. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19695. eCollection 2021 Nov. PMID 34976475
  • Clark DJ. Automaticity of walking: functional significance, mechanisms, measurement and rehabilitation strategies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 May 5;9:246. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00246. eCollection 2015. PMID 25999838
  • Seidler RD, Bernard JA, Burutolu TB, Fling BW, Gordon MT, Gwin JT, Kwak Y, Lipps DB. Motor control and aging: links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Apr;34(5):721-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Oct 20. PMID 19850077