TrialReader


Comparison of Gastric Volume Changes After Ventilation With Endotracheal Tube, First-Generation Supraglottic Airway, and Second-Generation Supraglottic Airway in Pediatric Patients

NCT07555080 — Recruiting, 250 participants, Istanbul University

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Comparison of Gastric Volume Changes Via Ultrasound After Ventilation With Endotracheal Tube, First-Generation Supraglottic Airway, and Second-Generation Supraglottic Airway in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

RegistryNCT07555080
StatusRecruiting
Study typeObservational
Enrollment250 (Estimated)
SponsorIstanbul University (Other)
ConditionsGastric Ultrasonography, Supraglottic Airways, Supraglottic Airway Use in Children, Gastric Volume, Gastric Insufflation, Airway Complications
Datesstart 2026-06-15, primary completion 2026-08-20, completion 2026-09-01 (estimated), first posted 2026-04-28, last updated 2026-09-17
Locations1 site in Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Gastric Ultrasonography All trials for Supraglottic Airways

-Summary

This study aims to compare the gastric volumes of pediatric patients undergoing positive-pressure ventilation with different airway management techniques. Gastric ultrasound is a non-invasive bedside tool with high sensitivity and specificity for determining the nature and amount of gastric content. In pediatric cases, maintaining a gastric volume below 1.25 mL/kg is associated with a lower risk of perioperative aspiration.

Although supraglottic airway devices (SADs) are commonly used as alternatives to endotracheal tubes, concerns regarding the potential for gastric insufflation and subsequent aspiration persist. Second-generation SADs were specifically designed with gastric drainage channels to mitigate the risk of regurgitation compared to first-generation devices.

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in gastric volumes, as measured by ultrasound, among three groups of pediatric patients: those managed with endotracheal tubes, first-generation SADs, and second-generation SADs. By comparing these measurements post-ventilation, the investigators aim to evaluate the impact of the airway device choice on gastric volume under clinical conditions.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

All participants will receive a standard preoperative intravenous (IV) dose of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam in the preparation room. Upon arrival at the operating room, routine monitoring will be established for all patients, including electrocardiography (ECG), non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2). Before the induction of anesthesia (T0), the gastric antral area will be evaluated using ultrasound in the right lateral decubitus (RLD) position. A high-frequency linear probe will be placed sagittally in the epigastric region to visualize the stomach antrum, located posterior to the left lobe of the liver and anterior to the abdominal aorta. The largest and smallest diameters (d1 and d2) of the elliptical antrum will be measured. The Antral Cross-Sectional Area (ACSA) will be calculated using the formula: ACSA = d1*d2*pi/4. Gastric volume will then be derived using the validated pediatric formula: \[0.035*ACSA (mm2) + 0.127*age (months) - 7.8\] / body weight (kg). Standard general anesthesia induction will be performed using sevoflurane and oxygen inhalation, 1 mcg/kg IV fentanyl, and 0.5 mg/kg IV rocuronium. Following induction, patients will be managed with either endotracheal intubation or a supraglottic airway device (SAD). The choice of airway management will follow routine clinical practice. SAD size and cuff inflation volume will adhere to the manufacturer's recommendations. Any volume leakage during ventilation will be recorded as a percentage. Anesthesia maintenance will be provided with 1 MAC sevoflurane in an oxygen/air mixture. The gastric antral area will be re-evaluated via ultrasound in the RLD position at two additional time points: T1: Immediately after the airway device is secured and ventilation is established, before the start of surgery. T2: At the end of the surgical procedure, before the patient emerges from anesthesia. All relevant clinical data will be recorded in the patient follow-up form, including age, gender, height, weight, duration of surgery, vital signs, type of airway device used, perioperative airway pressures, and any observed complications. Following the final measurement, patients will be emerged from anesthesia and transferred to the postoperative recovery room according to standard protocols.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Endotracheal intubation tubeThe patients who ventilated by endotracheal tube
First-generation supraglottic airwayPatients ventilated via a first-generation supraglottic airway
Second-generation supraglottic airwayPatients ventilated via a second-generation supraglottic airway

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Comparison of gastric volume changes smong study groups [up to 2 hours]: The primary outcome is to compare the change in gastric volume calculated via ultrasound at T0 (before induction), T1 (after the airway secured), and T2 (end of the operation) among the three groups (Endotracheal tube, first-generation SAD, and second-generation SAD). This will determine whether the choice of airway device leads to a difference in gastric volume during the perioperative period.

Secondary outcomes

  • Correlation between duration of surgery and change in gastric volume [30 minutes to 2 hours]: Total duration of the surgical procedure and the change in gastric volume
  • Antral cross sectional area changes [up to 2 hours]: Meauserement of antral cross sectional area at T0, T1 and T2 on lateral decubitis position
  • Air leakege [up to 2 hours]: Air leakage percentage with different airway devices
  • Airway pressures [up to 2 hours]: Peak airway pressures during surgery duration
  • SpO2 [up to 2 hours]: Pulse oximeter
  • Heart rate [up to 2 hours]: ECG monitoring
  • Mean arteryal pressure [up to 2 hours]: Non-invasive blood pressure measurement
  • Airway complications [up to 3 hours]: Perioperative airway complications such as bronchospasm, laryngospasm etc. will be noted

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 1 Year to 10 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* 1-10 years of age
* Adherence to standard preoperative fasting guidelines
* Elective surgeries
* ASA I-III status
* Surgery time 30 min to 2 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

* Gastrointestinal tract surgeries
* Laparoscopic surgeries
* Emergency procedures
* Full stomach patients
* Lack of parental/guardian consent

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Istanbul UniversityIstanbulTurkey (Türkiye)Recruiting

+Publications

  • Pan S, Lin C, Tsui BCH. Neonatal and paediatric point-of-care ultrasound review. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Oct 13;26(1):46-58. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12322. eCollection 2023 Feb. PMID 36960139
  • Theiler L, Gutzmann M, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Urwyler N, Kaempfen B, Greif R. i-gel supraglottic airway in clinical practice: a prospective observational multicentre study. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Dec;109(6):990-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes309. Epub 2012 Sep 6. PMID 22956643
  • Alakkad H, Kruisselbrink R, Chin KJ, Niazi AU, Abbas S, Chan VW, Perlas A. Point-of-care ultrasound defines gastric content and changes the anesthetic management of elective surgical patients who have not followed fasting instructions: a prospective case series. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;62(11):1188-95. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0449-1. Epub 2015 Aug 4. PMID 26239668

+Investigators

My Notes