Upadacitinib Versus Infliximab as Second-Line Treatment for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis(UPRISE)

NCT07550673 — Phase 4, Recruiting, 226 participants, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Upadacitinib Versus Infliximab as Second-Line Treatment for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial

RegistryNCT07550673
StatusRecruiting
PhasePhase 4
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, treatment
Enrollment226 (Estimated)
SponsorXijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases (Other)
ConditionsAcute Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Interventionsupadacitinib, Infliximab (Drug)
Datesstart 2026-04-20, primary completion 2028-04-01 (estimated), completion 2028-11-01 (estimated), first posted 2026-04-24, last updated 2026-04-24
Locations4 sites in China

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis All trials of upadacitinib All trials of Infliximab

-Summary

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of upadacitinib versus infliximab as second-line treatments for acute severe ulcerative colitis, addressing the following key questions: (1) Can upadacitinib as a second-line therapy effectively induce remission in acute severe ulcerative colitis with efficacy non-inferior to infliximab? (2) What adverse reactions may occur with upadacitinib in the treatment of acute severe ulcerative colitis? Researchers will also compare the efficacy of upadacitinib with that of corticosteroids to assess its therapeutic effect. Participants will be assigned to either the upadacitinib group (receiving upadacitinib extended-release tablets 45 mg once daily for 8 weeks, followed by 30 mg once daily) or the infliximab group (receiving an initial dose of 5 mg/kg, with additional doses at week 2, week 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter at the same dose). The treatment duration is 3 months, with outpatient visits for examinations and tests every two weeks. Patients will record their bowel movements and symptoms such as abdominal pain, and undergo colonoscopy, ultrasound examinations, and blood tests at specified time points.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Upadacitinib groupExperimentalDrug: upadacitinibUpadacitinib extended-release tablets 45 mg once daily for 8 weeks, then adjusted to 30 mg once daily.
Infliximab groupActive comparatorDrug: Infliximabreceiving an initial dose of 5 mg/kg, with additional doses at week 2, week 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter at the same dose
  • upadacitinib (Drug): receiving upadacitinib extended-release tablets 45 mg once daily for 8 weeks, followed by 30 mg once daily
  • Infliximab (Drug): receiving an initial dose of 5 mg/kg, with additional doses at week 2, week 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter at the same dose

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Clinical response by day 7 [The primary outcome was assessed by the investigator between days 3 and 7, with patients recorded as clinical responders if they had the primary outcome on any day in this assessment window.]: clinical response by day 7 (defined as a reduction in Lichtiger score to <10 points with a decrease of ≥3 points from baseline improvement in rectal bleeding, and decreased stool frequency to ≤4 per day).

Secondary outcomes

  • clinical response by day 14 [day 14]: Defined as mayo score decrease of ≥30% and ≥3 points from baseline, accompanied by a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1.
  • clinical remission by day 28, day 42, and day 90 [day 28, day 42, and day 90]: Total Mayo score ≤2 points and no individual subscore >1 point.
  • Endoscopic response by day 90 [day 90]: A decrease in MES score of ≥1 point, or a decrease of ≥50% from baseline.
  • Endoscopic remission by day 90 [day 90]: MES score ≤1
  • Endoscopic+clinical response [day 90]: Partial Mayo score ≤1 and MES ≤1
  • Clinical +FcP remission [day 90]: Partial Mayo score ≤1 and FcP≤250mg/kg
  • Clinical +CRP remission [day 90]: Partial Mayo score ≤1 and CRP≤5mg/L
  • Histologic remission [day 90]: typically defined as the absence of signs of neutrophilic infiltration. The specific criterion is a score below 2B.0, i.e., no increased neutrophils in the lamina propria.
  • Histologic improvement [day 90]: when assessing treatment efficacy, a score ≤ 3.1 (intraepithelial neutrophilic infiltration involving < 50% of crypts) is used as the threshold for histologic improvement.
  • Adverse Reactions [day 90]: Adverse Reactions
  • IBD questionnaire scores [day 0 and day 90]: IBDQ and fatigue questionnaire scores,The total score ranges from 32 to 224 points. The closer the score is to 224, the less the patient is troubled by the disease and the higher their quality of life.
  • PROMIS-Fatigue SF-7a [day 0 and day 90]: Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Fatigue Short Form 7a.The total score ranges from 7 to 35 points. The higher the score, the more severe the fatigue caused by the disease, and timely attention to the patient's condition is needed.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients diagnosed with ASUC
* Aged 18 years or older.
* No gender restriction.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Presence of contraindications, allergy, or intolerance to upadacitinib or infliximab.
* Patients requiring immediate colectomy; diagnosis of Crohn's disease; confirmed intestinal infection; hemodynamic instability; clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection; current malignancy.
* Presence of severe underlying systemic diseases involving the heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, hematologic system, or other organ systems.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
* Unwilling to participate in the clinical study.

+Locations (4)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Ankang Central HospitalAnkang, ShaanxiChinaRecruiting
3201 HospitalHanzhong, ShaanxiChinaRecruiting
Xijing Hosipital of Digestive DiseaseXi'an, ShaanxiChinaRecruiting
Shaanxi Provincial Nuclear Industry 215 HospitalXianyang, ShaanxiChinaRecruiting

+Publications

  • Honap S, St-Pierre J, Colwill M, Patel K, Le Berre C, Caron B, Nogami A, Kobayashi T, Altwegg R, Laharie D, Hebuterne X, Nachury M, Roblin X, Uzzan M, Kotze PG, Lukas M, Vieujean S, D'Amico F, Albshesh A, Guillo L, Fumery M, Nancey S, Ye BD, Bergemalm D, Halfvarson J, Buisson A, Karmiris K, Rubin DT, Vicaut E, Peyrin-Biroulet L; ATTRACT Study Group. Comparative Effectiveness of Tofacitinib vs Upadacitinib for the Treatment of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 Mar;24(3):784-793. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.07.025. Epub 2025 Jul 26. PMID 40721074
  • Choy MC, Li Wai Suen CFD, Con D, Boyd K, Pena R, Burrell K, Rosella O, Proud D, Brouwer R, Gorelik A, Liew D, Connell WR, Wright EK, Taylor KM, Pudipeddi A, Sawers M, Christensen B, Ng W, Begun J, Radford-Smith G, Garg M, Martin N, van Langenberg DR, Ding NS, Beswick L, Leong RW, Sparrow MP, De Cruz P. Intensified versus standard dose infliximab induction therapy for steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (PREDICT-UC): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Nov;9(11):981-996. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00200-0. Epub 2024 Sep 2. PMID 39236736