Tubeless Strategy for Enhanced Recovery After Sublobar Resection

NCT07409129 — Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, 138 participants, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Tubeless Strategy Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Thoracoscopic Sublobar Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

RegistryNCT07409129
StatusNot yet recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment
Enrollment138 (Estimated)
SponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Other)
ConditionsPulmonary Nodules, Early Stage Lung Cancer (I and II), Thoracoscopic Surgery, Sublobar Resection
InterventionsLaryngeal Mask Airway, Thoracic Paravertebral Block with Local Anesthetic, Non-intubated Anesthesia, Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube, Chest Tube Drainage (Device, drug, procedure)
Datesstart 2026-02-01 (estimated), primary completion 2026-06-01 (estimated), completion 2026-09-01 (estimated), first posted 2026-02-13, last updated 2026-02-13
Locations1 site in China

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Pulmonary Nodules All trials for Early Stage Lung Cancer (I and II) All trials of Laryngeal Mask Airway All trials of Thoracic Paravertebral Block with Local Anesthetic

-Summary

This is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at a single center. The study aims to evaluate whether a "tubeless" strategy can enhance recovery for patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracoscopic sublobar resection (wedge or segment resection) for small lung nodules.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:

* The experimental group will receive the "tubeless" strategy, which includes non-endotracheal intubation anesthesia (using a laryngeal mask) and no routine chest tube drainage after surgery.
* The control group will receive the traditional strategy, which includes double-lumen endotracheal intubation anesthesia and routine chest tube drainage.

The main goal is to compare the rate of achieving high-quality fast-track recovery at 24 hours after surgery between the two groups. This study will provide evidence on whether the tubeless approach can help patients recover faster and more comfortably without compromising safety.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

This is a prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Adult patients (aged 18-75) scheduled for uniportal VATS sublobar resection for peripheral lung nodules (≤2 cm, ≤2 cm from the pleura) will be assessed for eligibility. Key exclusion criteria include severe pleural adhesions, inability to achieve selective lung ventilation, and severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction.

The primary outcome is a composite endpoint measuring the rate of high-quality fast-track recovery at 24 hours postoperatively, defined as simultaneously meeting all three criteria: 1) meeting standardized discharge criteria, 2) a QoR-15 (Quality of Recovery-15) score ≥130, and 3) absence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II respiratory adverse events until the first follow-up.

Secondary outcomes include individual components of the primary endpoint, pneumothorax rate, postoperative pain scores, time to first ambulation, length of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, and patient satisfaction. A sample size of 138 participants (69 per group) was calculated to provide sufficient statistical power. Data analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Tubeless Strategy GroupExperimentalDevice: Laryngeal Mask Airway; Drug: Thoracic Paravertebral Block with Local Anesthetic; Procedure: Non-intubated AnesthesiaParticipants in this arm receive the tubeless strategy: * Anesthesia: Laryngeal mask airway with spontaneous ventilation (non-intubated). * Drainage: No chest tube placement after surgery * Goal: To enhance recovery by minimizing invasive procedures.
Traditional Strategy GroupActive comparatorDevice: Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube; Device: Chest Tube DrainageParticipants in this arm receive the conventional standard care: * Anesthesia: Double-lumen endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation. * Drainage: Routine chest tube drainage with water-seal suction postoperatively. * Follows current clinical guidelines for thoracoscopic sublobar resection.
  • Laryngeal Mask Airway (Device): Airway management using a laryngeal mask airway with spontaneous ventilation during thoracoscopic surgery.
  • Thoracic Paravertebral Block with Local Anesthetic (Drug): Thoracic paravertebral block using local anesthetic (e.g., ropivacaine) for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia.
  • Non-intubated Anesthesia (Procedure): General anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation without endotracheal intubation.
  • Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube (Device): Double-lumen endotracheal intubation for one-lung ventilation under general anesthesia.
  • Chest Tube Drainage (Device): Routine placement of a chest tube (18-22 Fr) with water-seal drainage postoperatively.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • 24-hour high-quality recovery rate [24 hours after surgery]: Composite endpoint defined as meeting all of the following criteria at 24 hours postoperatively: (1) meeting standardized discharge criteria (stable vital signs, controlled pain, autonomous ambulation); (2) Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score ≥130 (range 0-150; higher scores indicate better recovery); and (3) absence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II respiratory complications.

Secondary outcomes

  • Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) [From surgery until 30 days after discharge]: Incidence and severity of postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, including pneumothorax, atelectasis, and pleural effusion requiring intervention.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Age between 18 and 75 years.
* Scheduled for uniportal or multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for sublobar resection (wedge or segmentectomy).
* Presence of peripheral lung nodules ≤ 2 cm in diameter and ≤ 2 cm from the pleura, confirmed by CT scan.
* Ability to understand and provide written informed consent.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Severe pleural adhesions or fibrosis that would preclude non-intubated anesthesia or tubeless approach.
* Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction: FEV1 < 50% predicted, DLCO < 60% predicted, heart failure (NYHA class III-IV), or unstable angina.
* Pregnancy or lactation (confirmed by urine test if applicable).
* Inability to tolerate one-lung ventilation due to anatomical or physiological reasons.
* History of ipsilateral thoracic surgery.
* Active pulmonary infection, uncontrolled diabetes, or other comorbidities that increase surgical risk.
* Participation in another interventional trial within 30 days.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
The First Affiliated Hospital of GZMUGuangzhou, ChinaChina

+Publications

  • Results publication: Wen Y, Liang H, Qiu G, Liu Z, Liu J, Ying W, Liang W, He J. Non-intubated spontaneous ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Mar 1;57(3):428-437. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz279. PMID 31725158
  • Results publication: Myles PS, Shulman MA, Reilly J, Kasza J, Romero L. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;128(6):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Apr 14. PMID 35430086
  • Results publication: Liu J, Liang H, Cui F, Liu H, Zhu C, Liang W, He J; International Tubeless-Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Collaboration. Spontaneous versus mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 May;163(5):1702-1714.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.01.093. Epub 2021 Feb 3. PMID 33785209
  • Results publication: Chen JS, Cheng YJ, Hung MH, Tseng YD, Chen KC, Lee YC. Nonintubated thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):1038-43. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822ed19b. PMID 21869676
  • Results publication: Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, Brunelli A, Cerfolio RJ, Gonzalez M, Ljungqvist O, Petersen RH, Popescu WM, Slinger PD, Naidu B. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jan 1;55(1):91-115. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy301. PMID 30304509
  • Results publication: Khoury AL, McGinigle KL, Freeman NL, El-Zaatari H, Feltner C, Long JM; University of North Carolina School of Medicine Enhanced Recovery Program Working Group. Enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JTCVS Open. 2021 Jul 15;7:370-391. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2021.07.007. eCollection 2021 Sep. PMID 36003715
  • Results publication: Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet. 1995 Mar 25;345(8952):763-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90643-6. PMID 7891489