One vs. Two Stents for Gallbladder Disease

NCT07222527 — Not applicable, Recruiting, 30 participants, Mayo Clinic

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Randomized Trial of One vs. Two Transpapillary Cystic Duct Stents to Prevent Recurrent Symptomatic Gallbladder Disease in Non-Cholecystectomy Candidates

RegistryNCT07222527
StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment
Enrollment30 (Estimated)
SponsorMayo Clinic (Other)
ConditionsRecurrent Cholecystitis, Cholecystitis, Symptomatic Gallbladder Disease, Biliary Colic
InterventionsERCP with one stent placement, ERCP with two stent placement (Procedure)
Datesstart 2025-12-12, primary completion 2027-05-27 (estimated), completion 2028-05-27 (estimated), first posted 2025-10-30, last updated 2025-12-16
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Recurrent Cholecystitis All trials for Cholecystitis All trials of ERCP with one stent placement All trials of ERCP with two stent placement

-Summary

This randomized trial will look at whether placing two cystic duct stents is more effective than one cystic duct stent in preventing recurrent gallbladder disease (cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, or biliary colic) among patients who are not immediate surgical candidates for removal of their gallbladder.

The study will evaluate the safety profile, including rates of recurrent cholecystitis, biliary colic, and procedure-related complications, and technical success, defined as successful placement of stents into the gallbladder.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Does placement of two transpapillary cystic duct stents reduce the risk of recurrent symptomatic gallbladder disease compared to one stent?
2. Is there a difference in procedure-related adverse events (post-ERCP pancreatitis, cholangitis, stent migration) between the two strategies?

Researchers will compare outcomes between patients randomized to one stent versus two stents to determine which approach provides better long-term gallbladder drainage and fewer recurrent events.

Participants will:

Be evaluated for eligibility and provide informed consent prior to undergoing an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), an endoscopy where a guidewire is placed into the bile duct from the small intestine.

They will then undergo ERCP with transpapillary cystic duct stent placement, randomized to one or two stents.

All participants will receive standard post-procedure care and follow-up assessments for recurrence, adverse events, and need for reintervention.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
ONE STENT ARMActive comparatorProcedure: ERCP with one stent placementParticipant assigned to this Arm will undergo ERCP and have one transpapillary duct stent placed for the treatment of symptomatic gallbladder disease
TWO STENT ARMActive comparatorProcedure: ERCP with two stent placementParticipant assigned to this ARM will undergo ERCP and have two transpapillary duct stent placed for the treatment of symptomatic gallbladder disease.
  • ERCP with one stent placement (Procedure): One transpapillary cystic duct stent will be placed into the gallbladder via ERCP
  • ERCP with two stent placement (Procedure): Two transpapillary cystic duct stents will be placed into the gallbladder via ERCP

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Clinical Success [6 months]: Defined as absence of recurrence of symptomatic gallbladder disease (cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, or biliary colic) at 6 months post-procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  • Technical Success [1 day]: Defined as the ability to place the allocated number of transpapillary double pigtail stents into the gallbladder.
  • Time to Recurrence [6 months]: The amount of time (days) from the index procedure to when a recurrence occurs
  • Reintervention [6 months]: The proportion of participants who receive another endoscopic procedure due to failure/adverse events related to the index procedure
  • Adverse Events [6 months]: The type and severity of adverse events that occur related to the index procedure for stent placement

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 95 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Males or non-pregnant females presenting with cholecystitis, biliary colic or gallstone pancreatitis.
2. Age 18-95.
3. Participants must be willing and able to provide informed consent
4. Referred for ERCP for management of 1) suspected choledocholithiasis 2) acute biliary pancreatitis and/or 3) acute cholangitis in whom cholecystectomy is expected to be delayed > 30 days or are deemed to not be surgical candidates for cholecystectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Inability to provide informed consent
2. History of surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy (e.g. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Billroth I/II) precluding standard ERCP
3. History of primary sclerosing cholangitis
4. History of gallbladder cancer
5. History of cholecystectomy
6. Unsuccessful biliary cannulation during ERCP -

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Mayo ClinicRochester, MinnesotaUnited StatesRecruiting

+Publications

  • Results publication: Storm AC, Vargas EJ, Chin JY, Chandrasekhara V, Abu Dayyeh BK, Levy MJ, Martin JA, Topazian MD, Andrews JC, Schiller HJ, Kamath PS, Petersen BT. Transpapillary gallbladder stent placement for long-term therapy of acute cholecystitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Oct;94(4):742-748.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.025. Epub 2021 Mar 30. PMID 33798540

+Investigators