TrialReader


Evaluation of a 3D Printed Space Maintainer Versus the Conventional Band and Loop

NCT07161076 — Not applicable, Completed, 13 participants, British University In Egypt

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Evaluation of a Novel 3D Printed Space Maintainer Versus the Conventional Stainless-Steel Band and Loop: A Finite Element Analysis and In-Vivo Study

RegistryNCT07161076
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: double, prevention
Enrollment13 (Actual)
SponsorBritish University In Egypt (Other); collaborators: Suez Canal University
ConditionsSpace Maintenance, 3D Printing, Primary Teeth
Interventions3d Printed space maintainer, stainless steel band and loop (Device)
Datesstart 2024-05-01, primary completion 2026-01-30, completion 2026-07-21, first posted 2025-09-08, last updated 2026-09-29
Locations1 site in Egypt

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Space Maintenance All trials for 3D Printing All trials of 3d Printed space maintainer All trials of stainless steel band and loop

-Summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate whether a new 3D-printed dental device can effectively maintain space after premature loss of primary teeth in children, compared to the traditional stainless-steel device. It will also assess safety and comfort. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. What is the clinical success rate of 3D printed space maintainers compared to traditional metal band and loop space maintainers over a 12-month period?
2. How do 3D printed space maintainers compare in maintaining space and preventing rotation of abutment teeth?
3. What are the differences in gingival health outcomes between the two types of space maintainers?

Participants (13 children aged 6-9 years) will:

Receive both devices in a "split-mouth" design (one on each side of the mouth), totaling 26 treated tooth spaces (13 per group).

Attend checkups every 3 months for a year to monitor the devices' performance.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Metal Band and loopActive comparatorDevice: stainless steel band and loopClassic Stainless-steel Band and Loop , Control group
3d Printed Resin band and loopExperimentalDevice: 3d Printed space maintainer3d printed band and loop with the new design , using Permanent Crown resin
  • 3d Printed space maintainer (Device): using Next dent permanent crown resin, a digitally designed space maintainer will be 3d printed to maintain space after extraction
  • stainless steel band and loop (Device): lab fabricated metal band and loop

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Clinical Success Rate of Space Maintainers [12 months]: Percentage of space maintainers remaining functional without failure Unit of Measure: Percentage of participants
  • Gingival health index [at 3-month follow-up, 6 months follow-up , and 1 year follow-up]: measuring Gingival index for both space maintainers to compare the a ability of plaque to attach to both devices. scale 0-3, higher scores indicate worse gingival health

Secondary outcomes

  • Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale [immediately after cementation,at 3-month follow-up]: Scale Range: 0 (no hurt) to 10 (hurts worst) Interpretation: Higher scores indicate worse pain/lower satisfaction

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 6 Years to 9 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Apparently healthy children.
2. Children of both genders aged 6-9 years old.
3. Guardians agree to join the study and sign the informed consent.
4. Recent premature loss of primary first molars or having primary first molars indicated for extraction on both sides.
5. Sound buccal and lingual surfaces of abutment teeth (primary second molar and primary canine).
6. Good oral hygiene.
7. Absence of radiographic periapical pathology related to the abutment teeth.
8. Absence of abnormal occlusal conditions such as posterior crossbite, deep bite, and scissor bite.
9. All the indications for a band and loop space maintainer are met.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. The patient is not able to attend regular follow-up visits.
2. Allergic condition to any of the used materials.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
The British University in Egypt , Pediatric Dentistry ClinicEl Shorouk, Cairo GovernorateEgypt

+Study documents

+Investigators

  • Omar A Hodhod, Principal investigator, The British University in Egypt , Suez canal university

My Notes