Comparison of the Efficacy of Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block (RISS) Versus Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Blocks in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) for Postoperative Pain Management and Respiratory Function
| Registry | NCT07011069 |
|---|---|
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | Not applicable |
| Study type | Interventional; randomized, parallel, masking: triple, treatment |
| Enrollment | 93 (Actual) |
| Sponsor | Bursa City Hospital (Other gov) |
| Conditions | Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery, Regional Block for Pain Control, Regional Blocks, Pulmonary Functions |
| Interventions | ESP block group, RISS block group (Procedure) |
| Dates | start 2025-06-09, primary completion 2025-12-04, completion 2025-12-15, first posted 2025-06-08, last updated 2026-09-24 |
| Locations | 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye) |
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery All trials for Regional Block for Pain Control All trials of ESP block group All trials of RISS block group
To compare the rhomboid intercostal subserratus plane block with the erector spinae plane block regarding their analgesic efficacy and effects on respiratory function for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) can be very painful and may lead to complications such as prolonged stays in intensive care, thromboembolic complications due to lack of early mobilization, chronic acute pain, and delirium if adequate analgesia is not provided. Therefore, using thoracic epidural, paravertebral, or regional blocks as part of multimodal analgesia is recommended to provide effective pain relief.
This study aims to compare the effects of the erector spinae plane block (ESP) and rhomboid intercostal subserratus plane block (RISS) on postoperative analgesia and the improvement of respiratory parameters in patients undergoing VATS. These two techniques may have different analgesic profiles with respect to somatic and visceral pain.
The primary objective is to evaluate the incidence of chest tube-site somatic pain at postoperative hour 2. Secondary objectives include the incidence of visceral pain, total analgesic consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively, assessing resting and dynamic pain scores, triflow performance, complications, and length of hospital stay.
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients who received ESP block | Active comparator | Procedure: ESP block group | Those who received the erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain management |
| Patients who received RISS block | Active comparator | Procedure: RISS block group | Those who received the rhomboid intercostal subserratus plane block for postoperative pain management |
Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 80 Years
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients who will undergo VATS * Who agrees to participate * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II, and III * Elective surgery * Age between 18 and 80 years Exclusion Criteria: * Local anesthetic allergy * Who disagrees to participate * ASA physical status IV and V * Emergency surgery * Hemorrhagic disease * Thoracic vertebrae deformity * Thoracic vertebrae surgery
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Health Sciences, Bursa City Hospital | Bursa, Nilufer | Turkey (Türkiye) |