Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa (TRuE-HS2)

NCT06958211 — Phase 3, Active not recruiting, 573 participants, Incyte Corporation

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa

RegistryNCT06958211
StatusActive not recruiting
PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: quadruple, treatment
Enrollment573 (Actual)
SponsorIncyte Corporation (Industry)
ConditionsHidradenitis Suppurativa
InterventionsRuxolitinib Cream, Vehicle Cream (Drug)
Datesstart 2025-06-12, primary completion 2026-10-09 (estimated), completion 2027-07-11 (estimated), first posted 2025-05-06, last updated 2026-07-08
Locations107 sites in United States, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, Poland and 1 more countries

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Hidradenitis Suppurativa All trials of Ruxolitinib Cream All trials of Vehicle Cream

-Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream in participants with hidradenitis suppurativa.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Ruxolitinib 1.5 % CreamExperimentalDrug: Ruxolitinib CreamParticipants received ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, applied topically to the affected area as defined in the protocol.
Vehicle CreamPlacebo comparatorDrug: Vehicle CreamParticipants received vehicle cream, applied topically to the affected area as defined by the protocol.
  • Ruxolitinib Cream (Drug): Ruxolitinib cream applied topically to the affected area as a thin film twice daily.
  • Vehicle Cream (Drug): Matching vehicle cream applied topically to the affected area as a thin film twice daily.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Proportion of participants who achieve Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) Clinical Response 75 (HiSCR75) from baseline [Week 16]: HiSCR75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and/or inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count.

Secondary outcomes

  • Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 flare [Up to 16 weeks]: Defined as a ≥ 25% increase in AN count with a minimum increase in total AN count of 2 relative to baseline.
  • Proportion of participants who achieve HiSCR50 [Week 16]: Defined as a ≥ 50 reduction from baseline in total AN count with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count.
  • Proportion of participants who achieve Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)3 among participants with baseline Skin Pain NRS score ≥ 3 [Week 16]: Participants with a Skin Pain score of at least 3 at baseline and who achieve Skin Pain NRS3, defined as at least 3-unit reduction from baseline in the Skin Pain NRS.
  • Treatment-IR Population: Proportion of participants who achieve Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response 75 (HiSCR75) from baseline [Week 16]: Treatment IR-Population defined as participants who had an inadequate response, intolerance, or contraindication to prior topical or systemic medications for HS. HiSCR75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction from baseline in the total AN count with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count.
  • Treatment-IR Population: Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 HS flare [Up to 16 weeks]: Defined as a ≥ 25% increase in total AN count with a minimum increase in AN count of 2 relative to baseline.
  • Treatment-IR Population: Proportion of participants who achieve Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)3 among participants with baseline Skin Pain NRS score ≥ 3 [Week 16]: Participants with a Skin Pain score of at least 3 at baseline and who achieve Skin Pain NRS3, defined as at least 3-unit reduction from baseline in the Skin Pain NRS.
  • Proportion of participants who achieve HiSCR50/75/90/100 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 16 weeks]: Defined as a ≥ 50%/75%/90%/100% reduction from baseline in total AN count with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count.
  • Extension Period: Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 HS flare [From Week 16 through Week 52]: Defined as a ≥ 25% increase in total AN count with a minimum increase in AN count of 2 relative to baseline.
  • Proportion of participants who achieve abscess and/or inflammatory nodule (AN)75 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in total AN count.
  • Mean change from baseline in total AN count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as mean change in total AN count.
  • Percentage change from baseline in total AN count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as percent change from baseline in total AN count.
  • Mean change from baseline in abscess count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as mean change of abscess(es) count relative to baseline.
  • Percentage change from baseline in abscess count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Percent Change from baseline in number of abscess(es).
  • Mean change from baseline in inflammatory nodule count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as mean change of inflammatory nodule count relative to baseline.
  • Percentage change from baseline in inflammatory nodule count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as percent change from baseline in number of inflammatory nodule(s).
  • Proportion of participants with presence of draining tunnels at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Participants with presence of draining tunnels.
  • Proportion of participants who achieve Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)3 among participants with baseline Skin Pain NRS score ≥ 3 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Participants with a Skin Pain score of at least 3 at baseline and who achieve Skin Pain NRS3, defined as at least 3-unit reduction from baseline in the Skin Pain NRS.
  • Proportion of participants who achieve Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)30 among participants with baseline Itch NRS score ≥ 3 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Participants with a Itch score of at least 3 at baseline and who achieve Itch NRS30, defined as at least a 30% reduction and at least 1-unit reduction from baseline in the Itch NRS.
  • Proportion of participants who achieve Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The PGIC is based on a 7-point scale and the participant will rate each question from the start of treatment as 1-very much improved, 2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4-no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse, and 7-very much worse.
  • Proportion of participants who achieve PGIC score 1 or 2 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The PGIC is based on a 7-point scale and the participant will rate each question from the start of treatment as 1-very much improved, 2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4-no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse, and 7-very much worse.
  • Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) score at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The PGIS is a single-item, self-reporting measure in which the participant rates the severity of their overall status over the past week based on a 5-point scale: (1) none, (2) mild, (3) moderate, (4) severe, and (5) very severe.
  • Change from baseline in PGIS Score at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The PGIS is a single-item, self-reporting measure in which the participant rates the severity of their overall status over the past week based on 5-point scale: (1) none, (2) mild, (3) moderate, (4) severe, and (5) very severe.
  • Proportion of participants who achieve status of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQ1)4 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as a ≥ 4-point reduction in DLQI score relative to baseline. The DLQI is a simple, 10-question, validated questionnaire to measure how much a skin problem has affected an adult participant over the previous 7 days, across symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment.
  • Proportion of participants who achieve status of Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQ1)6 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as a ≥ 6-point reduction in CDLQI score relative to baseline. The CDLQI is a 10-question, validated questionnaire to measure the impact of skin disease on the lives of children over the previous 7 days.
  • Change from baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQoL) score at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The HiSQoL is a 17-item, HS-specific, health-related, quality-of-life instrument with a 7-day recall period used to assess HS symptoms and the impact of HS problems on quality of life.
  • Percent change from baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQoL) score at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The HiSQoL is a 17-item, HS-specific, health-related, quality-of-life instrument with a 7-day recall period used to assess HS symptoms and the impact of HS problems on quality of life.
  • Change from baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life - Adolescent (HiSQoL-AA) at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The HiSQoL-AA is a 15-item instrument with a 7-day recall period used to assess HS symptoms and experiences of HS in adolescent.
  • Percent change from baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life - Adolescent (HiSQoL-AA) at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The HiSQoL-AA is a 15-item instrument with a 7-day recall period used to assess HS symptoms and experiences of HS in adolescent.
  • Change from baseline in EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level scale (EQ-5D-5L) score at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a standardized, validated instrument for use as a measure of health outcome.
  • Treatment-IR Population: Change from baseline in total abscess count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as change from baseline in total abscess count.
  • Treatment-IR Population: Percent change from baseline in total abscess count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Percent Change from baseline in total abscess count.
  • Treatment-IR Population: Change from baseline in total inflammatory nodule count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as change from baseline in total number of inflammatory nodule(s).
  • Treatment-IR Population: Percent change from baseline in total inflammatory nodule count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as percent change from baseline in number of inflammatory nodule(s).
  • Treatment-IR Population: Proportion of participants with presence of draining tunnels at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Participants with presence of draining tunnels.
  • Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [Up to 56 weeks]: A TEAE or treatment emergent SAE is any AE or SAE either reported for first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study cream.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 12 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Diagnosis of HS for at least 6 months prior to screening visit.
* Mild to moderate HS (Hurley I or II) with the following at both screening and baseline visits:

  * A total AN count of at least 4, with no draining tunnels AND
  * Affecting at least 2 distinct anatomical areas
* Agreement to NOT use topical and systemic antibiotics for treatment of HS during the vehicle-controlled period.
* Agreement to NOT use topical antiseptics, including washes and leave-on products on the areas affected by HS lesions during the vehicle-controlled period and Weeks 16 to 20 of the extension period.
* Further inclusion criteria apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Body surface areas to be treated exceed 20% BSA at screening or baseline
* Presence of draining tunnels at screening or baseline.
* Medical history including current or history of certain infections, cancer, lymphoproliferative disorders and other medical conditions at the discretion of the investigator.
* Laboratory values outside of the protocol-defined criteria.
* Pregnant or lactating participants, or those considering pregnancy during the period of their study participation.
* Further exclusion criteria apply.

+Locations (107)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Investigative Site US257Birmingham, AlabamaUnited States
Investigative Site US218Birmingham, AlabamaUnited States
Investigative Site US239Montgomery, AlabamaUnited States
Investigative Site US215Phoenix, ArizonaUnited States
Investigative Site US261Phoenix, ArizonaUnited States
Investigative Site US240Tucson, ArizonaUnited States
Investigative Site US262Encino, CaliforniaUnited States
Investigative Site US222Fountain Valley, CaliforniaUnited States
Investigative Site US211Los Angeles, CaliforniaUnited States
Investigative Site US237Los Angeles, CaliforniaUnited States
Investigative Site US234Northridge, CaliforniaUnited States
Investigative Site US250Santa Ana, CaliforniaUnited States
Investigative Site US244Castle Rock, ColoradoUnited States
Investigative Site US252Cromwell, ConnecticutUnited States
Investigative Site US208Boca Raton, FloridaUnited States
Investigative Site US203Hialeah, FloridaUnited States
Investigative Site US258Jacksonville, FloridaUnited States
Investigative Site US206Maitland, FloridaUnited States
Investigative Site US223Miami, FloridaUnited States
Investigative Site US241Miami, FloridaUnited States
Investigative Site US202Miami, FloridaUnited States
Investigative Site US214Tampa, FloridaUnited States
Investigative Site US247Tampa, FloridaUnited States
Investigative Site US231Columbus, GeorgiaUnited States
Investigative Site US225Sandy Springs, GeorgiaUnited States
Investigative Site US207Skokie, IllinoisUnited States
Investigative Site US205Plainfield, IndianaUnited States
Investigative Site US264Lake Charles, LouisianaUnited States
Investigative Site US266New Orleans, LouisianaUnited States
Investigative Site US254Gambrills, MarylandUnited States
Investigative Site US201Marriottsville, MarylandUnited States
Investigative Site US253Milford, MassachusettsUnited States
Investigative Site US227Needham, MassachusettsUnited States
Investigative Site US268Worcester, MassachusettsUnited States
Investigative Site US238Ann Arbor, MichiganUnited States
Investigative Site US230Auburn Hills, MichiganUnited States
Investigative Site US251St Louis, MissouriUnited States
Investigative Site US271Wildwood, MissouriUnited States
Investigative Site US212Missoula, MontanaUnited States
Investigative Site US216Las Vegas, NevadaUnited States
Investigative Site US235Hoboken, New JerseyUnited States
Investigative Site US217Albuquerque, New MexicoUnited States
Investigative Site US219Brooklyn, New YorkUnited States
Investigative Site US246Elmhurst, New YorkUnited States
Investigative Site US269Fairport, New YorkUnited States
Investigative Site US213Kew Gardens, New YorkUnited States
Investigative Site US242New York, New YorkUnited States
Investigative Site US245Rochester, New YorkUnited States
Investigative Site US259Huntersville, North CarolinaUnited States
Investigative Site US263Winston-Salem, North CarolinaUnited States
Investigative Site US228Cleveland, OhioUnited States
Investigative Site US243Columbus, OhioUnited States
Investigative Site US249Columbus, OhioUnited States
Investigative Site US204Portland, OregonUnited States
Investigative Site US226Plymouth Meeting, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Investigative Site US256Bluffton, South CarolinaUnited States
Investigative Site US267Mt. Pleasant, South CarolinaUnited States
Investigative Site US255Austin, TexasUnited States
Investigative Site US260Cypress, TexasUnited States
Investigative Site US270Prosper, TexasUnited States
Investigative Site US232Sugar Land, TexasUnited States
Investigative Site US248Arlington, VirginiaUnited States
Investigative Site US209Danville, VirginiaUnited States
Investigative Site US229Norfolk, VirginiaUnited States
Investigative Site US265Seattle, WashingtonUnited States
Investigative Site US224Spokane, WashingtonUnited States
Investigative Site US210Milwaukee, WisconsinUnited States
Investigative Site BE204BrusselsBelgium
Investigative Site BE201GhentBelgium
Investigative Site BE203GhentBelgium
Investigative Site BE202LeuvenBelgium
Investigative Site BG201SevlievoBulgaria
Investigative Site BG202SofiaBulgaria
Investigative Site BG203SofiaBulgaria
Investigative Site CA209Edmonton, AlbertaCanada
Investigative Site CA201Winnipeg, ManitobaCanada
Investigative Site CA207Fredericton, New BrunswickCanada
Investigative Site CA202Hamilton, OntarioCanada
Investigative Site CA203London, OntarioCanada
Investigative Site CA204Markham, OntarioCanada
Investigative Site CA205Mississauga, OntarioCanada
Investigative Site CA208Saskatoon, SaskatchewanCanada
Investigative Site CA206St. John'sCanada
Investigative Site FR201ReimsFrance
Investigative Site FR203RouenFrance
Investigative Site FR204Saint-EtienneFrance
Investigative Site FR202ToulouseFrance
Investigative Site DE207Bad BentheimGermany
Investigative Site DE206GöttingenGermany
Investigative Site DE202HanoverGermany
Investigative Site DE203KielGermany
Investigative Site DE205LangenauGermany
Investigative Site DE204MerzigGermany
Investigative Site NL203AmsterdamNetherlands
Investigative Site NL201RotterdamNetherlands
Investigative Site PL202LublinPoland
Investigative Site LP204PoznanPoland
Investigative Site PL201RzeszówPoland
Investigative Site PL203WroclawPoland
Investigative Site ES205BarcelonaSpain

7 more sites not listed.

+Investigators

  • Incyte Study Monitor, Study director, Incyte Corporation