A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Ruxolitinib Cream in Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa
| Registry | NCT06958211 |
| Status | Active not recruiting |
| Phase | Phase 3 |
| Study type | Interventional; randomized, parallel, masking: quadruple, treatment |
| Enrollment | 573 (Actual) |
| Sponsor | Incyte Corporation (Industry) |
| Conditions | Hidradenitis Suppurativa |
| Interventions | Ruxolitinib Cream, Vehicle Cream (Drug) |
| Dates | start 2025-06-12, primary completion 2026-10-09 (estimated), completion 2027-07-11 (estimated), first posted 2025-05-06, last updated 2026-07-08 |
| Locations | 107 sites in United States, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, France, Germany, Netherlands, Poland and 1 more countries |
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Hidradenitis Suppurativa All trials of Ruxolitinib Cream All trials of Vehicle Cream
-Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream in participants with hidradenitis suppurativa.
Expand all sections · Collapse all
+Arms and interventions
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|
| Ruxolitinib 1.5 % Cream | Experimental | Drug: Ruxolitinib Cream | Participants received ruxolitinib 1.5% cream, applied topically to the affected area as defined in the protocol. |
| Vehicle Cream | Placebo comparator | Drug: Vehicle Cream | Participants received vehicle cream, applied topically to the affected area as defined by the protocol. |
- Ruxolitinib Cream (Drug): Ruxolitinib cream applied topically to the affected area as a thin film twice daily.
- Vehicle Cream (Drug): Matching vehicle cream applied topically to the affected area as a thin film twice daily.
+Outcome measures
Primary outcomes
- Proportion of participants who achieve Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) Clinical Response 75 (HiSCR75) from baseline [Week 16]: HiSCR75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction from baseline in the total abscess and/or inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count.
Secondary outcomes
- Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 flare [Up to 16 weeks]: Defined as a ≥ 25% increase in AN count with a minimum increase in total AN count of 2 relative to baseline.
- Proportion of participants who achieve HiSCR50 [Week 16]: Defined as a ≥ 50 reduction from baseline in total AN count with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count.
- Proportion of participants who achieve Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)3 among participants with baseline Skin Pain NRS score ≥ 3 [Week 16]: Participants with a Skin Pain score of at least 3 at baseline and who achieve Skin Pain NRS3, defined as at least 3-unit reduction from baseline in the Skin Pain NRS.
- Treatment-IR Population: Proportion of participants who achieve Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response 75 (HiSCR75) from baseline [Week 16]: Treatment IR-Population defined as participants who had an inadequate response, intolerance, or contraindication to prior topical or systemic medications for HS. HiSCR75 is defined as at least a 75% reduction from baseline in the total AN count with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count.
- Treatment-IR Population: Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 HS flare [Up to 16 weeks]: Defined as a ≥ 25% increase in total AN count with a minimum increase in AN count of 2 relative to baseline.
- Treatment-IR Population: Proportion of participants who achieve Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)3 among participants with baseline Skin Pain NRS score ≥ 3 [Week 16]: Participants with a Skin Pain score of at least 3 at baseline and who achieve Skin Pain NRS3, defined as at least 3-unit reduction from baseline in the Skin Pain NRS.
- Proportion of participants who achieve HiSCR50/75/90/100 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 16 weeks]: Defined as a ≥ 50%/75%/90%/100% reduction from baseline in total AN count with no increase from baseline in abscess or draining tunnel count.
- Extension Period: Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 HS flare [From Week 16 through Week 52]: Defined as a ≥ 25% increase in total AN count with a minimum increase in AN count of 2 relative to baseline.
- Proportion of participants who achieve abscess and/or inflammatory nodule (AN)75 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as a ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in total AN count.
- Mean change from baseline in total AN count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as mean change in total AN count.
- Percentage change from baseline in total AN count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as percent change from baseline in total AN count.
- Mean change from baseline in abscess count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as mean change of abscess(es) count relative to baseline.
- Percentage change from baseline in abscess count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Percent Change from baseline in number of abscess(es).
- Mean change from baseline in inflammatory nodule count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as mean change of inflammatory nodule count relative to baseline.
- Percentage change from baseline in inflammatory nodule count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as percent change from baseline in number of inflammatory nodule(s).
- Proportion of participants with presence of draining tunnels at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Participants with presence of draining tunnels.
- Proportion of participants who achieve Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)3 among participants with baseline Skin Pain NRS score ≥ 3 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Participants with a Skin Pain score of at least 3 at baseline and who achieve Skin Pain NRS3, defined as at least 3-unit reduction from baseline in the Skin Pain NRS.
- Proportion of participants who achieve Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)30 among participants with baseline Itch NRS score ≥ 3 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Participants with a Itch score of at least 3 at baseline and who achieve Itch NRS30, defined as at least a 30% reduction and at least 1-unit reduction from baseline in the Itch NRS.
- Proportion of participants who achieve Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The PGIC is based on a 7-point scale and the participant will rate each question from the start of treatment as 1-very much improved, 2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4-no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse, and 7-very much worse.
- Proportion of participants who achieve PGIC score 1 or 2 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The PGIC is based on a 7-point scale and the participant will rate each question from the start of treatment as 1-very much improved, 2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4-no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse, and 7-very much worse.
- Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) score at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The PGIS is a single-item, self-reporting measure in which the participant rates the severity of their overall status over the past week based on a 5-point scale: (1) none, (2) mild, (3) moderate, (4) severe, and (5) very severe.
- Change from baseline in PGIS Score at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The PGIS is a single-item, self-reporting measure in which the participant rates the severity of their overall status over the past week based on 5-point scale: (1) none, (2) mild, (3) moderate, (4) severe, and (5) very severe.
- Proportion of participants who achieve status of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQ1)4 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as a ≥ 4-point reduction in DLQI score relative to baseline. The DLQI is a simple, 10-question, validated questionnaire to measure how much a skin problem has affected an adult participant over the previous 7 days, across symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment.
- Proportion of participants who achieve status of Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQ1)6 at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as a ≥ 6-point reduction in CDLQI score relative to baseline. The CDLQI is a 10-question, validated questionnaire to measure the impact of skin disease on the lives of children over the previous 7 days.
- Change from baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQoL) score at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The HiSQoL is a 17-item, HS-specific, health-related, quality-of-life instrument with a 7-day recall period used to assess HS symptoms and the impact of HS problems on quality of life.
- Percent change from baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQoL) score at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The HiSQoL is a 17-item, HS-specific, health-related, quality-of-life instrument with a 7-day recall period used to assess HS symptoms and the impact of HS problems on quality of life.
- Change from baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life - Adolescent (HiSQoL-AA) at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The HiSQoL-AA is a 15-item instrument with a 7-day recall period used to assess HS symptoms and experiences of HS in adolescent.
- Percent change from baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life - Adolescent (HiSQoL-AA) at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The HiSQoL-AA is a 15-item instrument with a 7-day recall period used to assess HS symptoms and experiences of HS in adolescent.
- Change from baseline in EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level scale (EQ-5D-5L) score at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a standardized, validated instrument for use as a measure of health outcome.
- Treatment-IR Population: Change from baseline in total abscess count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as change from baseline in total abscess count.
- Treatment-IR Population: Percent change from baseline in total abscess count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Percent Change from baseline in total abscess count.
- Treatment-IR Population: Change from baseline in total inflammatory nodule count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as change from baseline in total number of inflammatory nodule(s).
- Treatment-IR Population: Percent change from baseline in total inflammatory nodule count at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Defined as percent change from baseline in number of inflammatory nodule(s).
- Treatment-IR Population: Proportion of participants with presence of draining tunnels at each postbaseline visit [Up to 52 weeks]: Participants with presence of draining tunnels.
- Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) [Up to 56 weeks]: A TEAE or treatment emergent SAE is any AE or SAE either reported for first time or worsening of a pre-existing event after first application of study cream.
+Eligibility
Sex: All, ages: 12 Years to any
Inclusion Criteria:
* Diagnosis of HS for at least 6 months prior to screening visit.
* Mild to moderate HS (Hurley I or II) with the following at both screening and baseline visits:
* A total AN count of at least 4, with no draining tunnels AND
* Affecting at least 2 distinct anatomical areas
* Agreement to NOT use topical and systemic antibiotics for treatment of HS during the vehicle-controlled period.
* Agreement to NOT use topical antiseptics, including washes and leave-on products on the areas affected by HS lesions during the vehicle-controlled period and Weeks 16 to 20 of the extension period.
* Further inclusion criteria apply.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Body surface areas to be treated exceed 20% BSA at screening or baseline
* Presence of draining tunnels at screening or baseline.
* Medical history including current or history of certain infections, cancer, lymphoproliferative disorders and other medical conditions at the discretion of the investigator.
* Laboratory values outside of the protocol-defined criteria.
* Pregnant or lactating participants, or those considering pregnancy during the period of their study participation.
* Further exclusion criteria apply.
+Locations (107)
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|
| Investigative Site US257 | Birmingham, Alabama | United States | |
| Investigative Site US218 | Birmingham, Alabama | United States | |
| Investigative Site US239 | Montgomery, Alabama | United States | |
| Investigative Site US215 | Phoenix, Arizona | United States | |
| Investigative Site US261 | Phoenix, Arizona | United States | |
| Investigative Site US240 | Tucson, Arizona | United States | |
| Investigative Site US262 | Encino, California | United States | |
| Investigative Site US222 | Fountain Valley, California | United States | |
| Investigative Site US211 | Los Angeles, California | United States | |
| Investigative Site US237 | Los Angeles, California | United States | |
| Investigative Site US234 | Northridge, California | United States | |
| Investigative Site US250 | Santa Ana, California | United States | |
| Investigative Site US244 | Castle Rock, Colorado | United States | |
| Investigative Site US252 | Cromwell, Connecticut | United States | |
| Investigative Site US208 | Boca Raton, Florida | United States | |
| Investigative Site US203 | Hialeah, Florida | United States | |
| Investigative Site US258 | Jacksonville, Florida | United States | |
| Investigative Site US206 | Maitland, Florida | United States | |
| Investigative Site US223 | Miami, Florida | United States | |
| Investigative Site US241 | Miami, Florida | United States | |
| Investigative Site US202 | Miami, Florida | United States | |
| Investigative Site US214 | Tampa, Florida | United States | |
| Investigative Site US247 | Tampa, Florida | United States | |
| Investigative Site US231 | Columbus, Georgia | United States | |
| Investigative Site US225 | Sandy Springs, Georgia | United States | |
| Investigative Site US207 | Skokie, Illinois | United States | |
| Investigative Site US205 | Plainfield, Indiana | United States | |
| Investigative Site US264 | Lake Charles, Louisiana | United States | |
| Investigative Site US266 | New Orleans, Louisiana | United States | |
| Investigative Site US254 | Gambrills, Maryland | United States | |
| Investigative Site US201 | Marriottsville, Maryland | United States | |
| Investigative Site US253 | Milford, Massachusetts | United States | |
| Investigative Site US227 | Needham, Massachusetts | United States | |
| Investigative Site US268 | Worcester, Massachusetts | United States | |
| Investigative Site US238 | Ann Arbor, Michigan | United States | |
| Investigative Site US230 | Auburn Hills, Michigan | United States | |
| Investigative Site US251 | St Louis, Missouri | United States | |
| Investigative Site US271 | Wildwood, Missouri | United States | |
| Investigative Site US212 | Missoula, Montana | United States | |
| Investigative Site US216 | Las Vegas, Nevada | United States | |
| Investigative Site US235 | Hoboken, New Jersey | United States | |
| Investigative Site US217 | Albuquerque, New Mexico | United States | |
| Investigative Site US219 | Brooklyn, New York | United States | |
| Investigative Site US246 | Elmhurst, New York | United States | |
| Investigative Site US269 | Fairport, New York | United States | |
| Investigative Site US213 | Kew Gardens, New York | United States | |
| Investigative Site US242 | New York, New York | United States | |
| Investigative Site US245 | Rochester, New York | United States | |
| Investigative Site US259 | Huntersville, North Carolina | United States | |
| Investigative Site US263 | Winston-Salem, North Carolina | United States | |
| Investigative Site US228 | Cleveland, Ohio | United States | |
| Investigative Site US243 | Columbus, Ohio | United States | |
| Investigative Site US249 | Columbus, Ohio | United States | |
| Investigative Site US204 | Portland, Oregon | United States | |
| Investigative Site US226 | Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania | United States | |
| Investigative Site US256 | Bluffton, South Carolina | United States | |
| Investigative Site US267 | Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina | United States | |
| Investigative Site US255 | Austin, Texas | United States | |
| Investigative Site US260 | Cypress, Texas | United States | |
| Investigative Site US270 | Prosper, Texas | United States | |
| Investigative Site US232 | Sugar Land, Texas | United States | |
| Investigative Site US248 | Arlington, Virginia | United States | |
| Investigative Site US209 | Danville, Virginia | United States | |
| Investigative Site US229 | Norfolk, Virginia | United States | |
| Investigative Site US265 | Seattle, Washington | United States | |
| Investigative Site US224 | Spokane, Washington | United States | |
| Investigative Site US210 | Milwaukee, Wisconsin | United States | |
| Investigative Site BE204 | Brussels | Belgium | |
| Investigative Site BE201 | Ghent | Belgium | |
| Investigative Site BE203 | Ghent | Belgium | |
| Investigative Site BE202 | Leuven | Belgium | |
| Investigative Site BG201 | Sevlievo | Bulgaria | |
| Investigative Site BG202 | Sofia | Bulgaria | |
| Investigative Site BG203 | Sofia | Bulgaria | |
| Investigative Site CA209 | Edmonton, Alberta | Canada | |
| Investigative Site CA201 | Winnipeg, Manitoba | Canada | |
| Investigative Site CA207 | Fredericton, New Brunswick | Canada | |
| Investigative Site CA202 | Hamilton, Ontario | Canada | |
| Investigative Site CA203 | London, Ontario | Canada | |
| Investigative Site CA204 | Markham, Ontario | Canada | |
| Investigative Site CA205 | Mississauga, Ontario | Canada | |
| Investigative Site CA208 | Saskatoon, Saskatchewan | Canada | |
| Investigative Site CA206 | St. John's | Canada | |
| Investigative Site FR201 | Reims | France | |
| Investigative Site FR203 | Rouen | France | |
| Investigative Site FR204 | Saint-Etienne | France | |
| Investigative Site FR202 | Toulouse | France | |
| Investigative Site DE207 | Bad Bentheim | Germany | |
| Investigative Site DE206 | Göttingen | Germany | |
| Investigative Site DE202 | Hanover | Germany | |
| Investigative Site DE203 | Kiel | Germany | |
| Investigative Site DE205 | Langenau | Germany | |
| Investigative Site DE204 | Merzig | Germany | |
| Investigative Site NL203 | Amsterdam | Netherlands | |
| Investigative Site NL201 | Rotterdam | Netherlands | |
| Investigative Site PL202 | Lublin | Poland | |
| Investigative Site LP204 | Poznan | Poland | |
| Investigative Site PL201 | Rzeszów | Poland | |
| Investigative Site PL203 | Wroclaw | Poland | |
| Investigative Site ES205 | Barcelona | Spain | |
7 more sites not listed.
+Investigators
- Incyte Study Monitor, Study director, Incyte Corporation