Spinal Anesthesia for Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

NCT06860893 — Phase 4, Completed, 30 participants, University Hospital of North Norway

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Spinal Anesthesia as an Adjunct to General Anesthesia for Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy - a Randomised Placebo- Controlled Trial

RegistryNCT06860893
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 4
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: triple, treatment
Enrollment30 (Actual)
SponsorUniversity Hospital of North Norway (Other); collaborators: University of Tromso
ConditionsProstate Cancer Surgery
InterventionsSpinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine, Placebo (Drug)
Datesstart 2025-02-28, primary completion 2025-09-20, completion 2025-09-20, first posted 2025-03-06, last updated 2025-11-21
Locations1 site in Norway

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Prostate Cancer Surgery All trials of Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine All trials of Placebo

-Summary

The investigators hypothesised that spinal anesthesia as an adjunct to general anesthesia would facilitate faster recovery and less pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic robotic prostatectomy. A double-blind placebo-controlled study was subsequently designed.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Patients were allocated to either intrathecal injection of bupivacaine/morphine or a sham spinal procedure. All patients were placed in a sitting position and the skin over the lumbar region of the back was disinfected with chlorhexidine and draped sterile. In the intervention group the skin was infiltrated with 5 mL of lidocaine 10 mg/mL and a sterile 27-gauge pencil-point needle (Pajunk, GA, USA) was subsequently entered into the intrathecal space at the L2-3 or L3-4 interspace. After obtaining return of cerebrospinal fluid, hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg/mL 1,5 mL (7,5 mg) and morphine 200 µg/mL, 0.5 mL (100 µg) was injected intrathecally. Patients in the placebo group received an identical treatment as the patients in the intervention group, except for the intrathecal injection. After the skin was infiltrated with 5 mL of lidocaine 10 mg/mL, the attending anesthesiologist pressed one finger at the skin and talked as if she was giving an intrathecal injection at the L3-4 interspace. All patients were treated by the same anesthesiologist (MA).

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Spinal anesthesiaActive comparatorDrug: Spinal Anesthesia with BupivacaineAfter obtaining return of cerebrospinal fluid, hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg/mL 1,5 mL (7,5 mg) and morphine 200 µg/mL, 0.5 mL (100 µg) was injected intrathecally.
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorDrug: PlaceboLocal skin infiltration with lidocain 10 mg/ml
  • Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine (Drug): After obtaining return of cerebrospinal fluid, hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg/mL 1,5 mL (7,5 mg) and morphine 200 µg/mL, 0.5 mL (100 µg) was injected intrathecally.
  • Placebo (Drug): Local skin infiltration with lidocaine

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Time to discharge from the post anesthesia care unit. [24 hrs]: Minutes of stay in the post anesthesia care unit

+Eligibility

Sex: Male, ages: 18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

\- Prostate cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

* Benign prostate disease

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University Hospital of North NorwayTromsøNorway