Comparison of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes

NCT06649526 — Active not recruiting, 70 participants, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management

RegistryNCT06649526
StatusActive not recruiting
Study typeObservational
Enrollment70 (Actual)
SponsorDr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital (Other gov)
ConditionsAnesthesia
Interventionsendotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscope (Other)
Datesstart 2024-09-01, primary completion 2024-11-01 (estimated), completion 2024-11-01 (estimated), first posted 2024-10-18, last updated 2024-10-18
Locations1 site in Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Anesthesia All trials of endotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscope

-Summary

The aim of this study is to answer the question of whether direct laryngoscopy can be performed with videolaryngoscopes. How do the videos of the laryngoscopes provide images directly in laryngoscopy? Primary objective: To compare the images of Hugemed and Mcgrath videolarinygoscope in direct laryngoscopy and indirect laryngoscopy secondary objective: to compare the effects on haemodynamic response Participants :people who are not expected to have difficult intubation

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Direct and indirect images of hugemed and McGrath videolaryngoscope during intubation, haemodynamic responses, procedure time will be compared

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Group MC McGrath videolaryngoscope Group H Hugmed VideolaryngoscopeOther: endotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopeAll patients will receive intravenous premedication with midazolam 0.03 mg/kg approximately 30 minutes before induction of anaesthesia. Preoperatively, standard monitoring included a 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) with continuous ST-segment analysis and assessment of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and intermittent non-invasive blood pressure. Following preoxygenation with 100% oxygen for three minutes, general anaesthesia would be induced with propofol (3mg/kg) a few minutes after injection of fentanyl (2µg/kg). Neuromuscular paralysis will be induced with rocuronium (0.5 mg/kg) in all patients.In group MC, direct and indirect Modified Cormack Lehane score and POGO score will be evaluated with McGrath videolaryngoscope. In Group H, direct and indirect Modified Cormack Lehane score and POGO score will be evaluated with Hugemed videolaryngoscope.
  • endotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscope (Other): The present study will compare the images of two different VLs with Macintosh blades (the McGrath videolaryngoscope and the Hugemed videolaryngoscope) in both indirect (screen images) and direct (images viewed through the mouth) laryngoscopy.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management [3 months]: Videolaryngoscopy (VL) is a frequently used method in airway management to improve the success of tracheal intubation in recent years. VLs have a miniature video camera at the tip of the blades which allows indirect visualisation of the glottis (1,2,3). The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) recommends that a VL should be available and used for all patients with a particularly difficult airway and for whom intubation is planned In recent years, a number of VLs have emerged that offer several advantages over direct laryngoscopy.It is aimed to compare direct and indirect images of mcgrath and hugemed videolaryngoscope.
  • Comparison of Direct and Indirect Images of Two Different Video Laryngoscopes in Adult Airway Management [3 months]: The principal objective of this study was to undertake a comparative analysis of the images produced by two distinct VLs during direct and indirect laryngoscopy

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 65 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

To be between 18 -65 years old Mallampati score I-II Cormack-Lehane score I-II ASA physical status I-II who required endotracheal intubation for elective surgery

Exclusion criteria Pregnancy Mallampati score III-IV Cormack-Lehane score III-IV ASA physical score III-IV sternomental distance < 12.5 cm mandibular-hyoid distance < 6 cm

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kirdar City Hospital Cevizli D-100 Güney Yanyol, No:47 Kartal Istanbul TurkeyIstanbulTurkey (Türkiye)

+Publications

  • Results publication: Sezen O, Simsek T, Simsek AK, Arslan G, Saracoglu KT, Saracoglu A. Comparison of direct and indirect images and hemodynamic response of two different video laryngoscopes to tracheal intubation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02966-7. PMID 39979796