A Study of Vedolizumab With and Without Upadacitinib in Adults With Crohn's Disease

NCT06227910 — Phase 3, Recruiting, 396 participants, Takeda

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3b Study to Evaluate the Short- and Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Dual Targeted Therapy With Intravenous Vedolizumab and Oral Upadacitinib Compared With Intravenous Vedolizumab and Oral Placebo for Induction Followed by Intravenous Vedolizumab Monotherapy for Maintenance in the Treatment of Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

RegistryNCT06227910, acronym VICTRIVA
StatusRecruiting
PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional; randomized, sequential, masking: quadruple, treatment
Enrollment396 (Estimated)
SponsorTakeda (Industry)
ConditionsCrohn's Disease
InterventionsVedolizumab, Upadacitinib, Placebo (Drug)
Datesstart 2025-01-02, primary completion 2027-06-08 (estimated), completion 2028-08-01 (estimated), first posted 2024-01-29, last updated 2026-05-27
Locations138 sites in United States, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark and 18 more countries

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Crohn's Disease All trials of Vedolizumab All trials of Upadacitinib

-Summary

The main aim of this study is to learn whether vedolizumab and upadacitinib given together (also called dual targeted therapy or DTT) reduces bowel inflammation and ulcers in the bowel compared to vedolizumab only (also called monotherapy) in adults with moderately or severely active Crohn's Disease (CD) after 12 weeks of treatment. Other aims are to learn how safe and effective DTT is compared to monotherapy for these participants.

All participants will receive DTT (either vedolizumab and upadacitinib or vedolizumab and placebo) for 12 weeks. Participants responding to the treatment will then receive vedolizumab only (monotherapy) for an additional 40 weeks.

During the study, participants will visit their study clinic 15 times.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The drug being tested in this study is vedolizumab. Vedolizumab is being tested to treat people with moderately to severely active CD. The study will look at the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab with and without upadacitinib. The study will enroll approximately 396 patients. Participants will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two treatment groups in the 12-weeks Induction Phase:

* Induction Phase: Vedolizumab + Upadacitinib
* Induction Phase: Vedolizumab + Placebo

Participants who achieve a Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) reduction of greater than or equal to (>=)70 points from baseline at Week 12 will enter the main study Maintenance Phase (40 weeks) of the study to receive vedolizumab monotherapy. Participants will be followed for a further 18-week safety follow-up period up to Week 70.

This multi-center trial will be conducted worldwide. The overall time to participate in this study is approximately 70 weeks.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Double-blind Induction Phase: Vedolizumab + UpadacitinibExperimentalDrug: Vedolizumab; Drug: UpadacitinibParticipants will receive vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 2, 6 and 10 along with upadacitinib 45 mg, orally, once daily (QD) for 12 weeks.
Double-blind Induction Phase: Vedolizumab + PlaceboPlacebo comparatorDrug: Vedolizumab; Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive vedolizumab IV 300 mg infusion, at Weeks 0, 2, 6 and 10 along with upadacitinib matched placebo, orally, QD for 12 weeks.
Main Study Maintenance Phase: Vedolizumab MonotherapyExperimentalDrug: VedolizumabParticipants who achieve a CDAI reduction of >=70 points from baseline at Week 12 will receive vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion (monotherapy), every 8 weeks (Q8W) starting at Week 14 to 52. The Q8W vedolizumab monotherapy may be escalated to Q4W at the investigator's discretion.
  • Vedolizumab (Drug), also known as Entyvio, MLN0002, KYNTELES: Vedolizumab IV infusion.
  • Upadacitinib (Drug), also known as Rinvoq: Upadacitinib over-encapsulated tablets.
  • Placebo (Drug): Upadacitinib matched placebo capsules.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on the CDAI at Week 12 [Week 12]: Clinical remission is defined as a CDAI score of less than (<) 150 points. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI consists of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity.
  • Percentage of Participants Exhibiting an Endoscopic Response Based on Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) at Week 12 [Week 12]: Endoscopic response per SES-CD is defined as decrease in SES CD greater than (>) 50% from baseline (or for participants with isolated ileal disease, SES-CD <=4 or a >=2-point reduction in SES-CD from baseline) read centrally. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size,percentage of ulcerated and affected surface area, presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum,right,transverse,and left colon,rectum). Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is most severe case, with sum of the scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. Overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Secondary outcomes

  • Percentage of Participants Achieving 2-item Patient-reported Outcome Measure (PRO2) Based Clinical Remission at Week 12 [Week 12]: Clinical remission based on PRO2 is defined as 7-day average of very soft or liquid stool frequency (SF) less than or equal to ( <=) 2.8, 7-day average of abdominal pain (AP) score <=1.0, and neither worse than baseline. The PRO2 is comprised of the stool frequency and abdominal pain components of the CDAI.
  • Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission Based on SES-CD at Week 12 [Week 12]: Endoscopic remission as per SES-CD is defined as a SES-CD score of <=4 and no subscore >1, read centrally. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of surface area (SA) that is ulcerated, percentage of SA affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy. Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is most severe case, with sum of scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.
  • Percentage of Participants Exhibiting Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission in Participants who Were Taking Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on the CDAI at Week 12 [Week 12]: Percentage of participants using oral corticosteroids at Baseline who have discontinued corticosteroids and are in clinical remission per CDAI at Week 12 will be reported. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI consist of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity.
  • Percentage of Participants Exhibiting a Clinical Response Based on the CDAI at Week 12 [Week 12]: Clinical response is defined as >=100-point decrease from baseline in CDAI score. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI consist of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity.
  • Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on the CDAI at Week 52 [Week 52]: Clinical remission is defined as a CDAI score of <150 points. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI consists of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity.
  • Percentage of Participants Exhibiting an Endoscopic Response Based on SES-CD at Week 52 [Week 52]: Endoscopic response per SES-CD is defined as a decrease in SES CD >50% from baseline (or for participants with isolated ileal disease,SES-CD <=4 or a >=2-point reduction in SES-CD from baseline) read centrally. SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size,percentage of ulcerated and affected surface area,presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy (ileum,right,transverse,and left colon,and rectum). Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is most severe case, with sum of scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. Overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.
  • Percentage of Participants Achieving 2-item PRO2 Based Clinical Remission at Week 52 [Week 52]: Clinical remission based on PRO2 is defined as 7-day average of very soft or liquid stool frequency (SF) <=2.8, 7-day average of abdominal pain (AP) score <=1.0, and neither worse than baseline. The PRO2 is comprised of the stool frequency and abdominal pain components of the CDAI.
  • Percentage of Participants Achieving Endoscopic Remission Based on SES-CD at Week 52 [Week 52]: Endoscopic remission as per SES-CD is defined as a SES-CD score of <=4 and no subscore >1, read centrally . SES-CD evaluates 4 endoscopic variables (ulcer size, percentage of surface area (SA) that is ulcerated, percentage of SA affected, and presence and type of narrowings in 5 colonic segments evaluated during ileocolonoscopy. Each variable is coded from 0 to 3 based on severity, where 0 is none or not severe and 3 is most severe case, with sum of scores for each variable ranging from 0 to 15, except for presence of narrowing. Presence of narrowing ranges from 0 to 11 since a severity of 3 represents a narrowing which a colonoscope cannot be passed and, thus, can only be observed once among the bowel segments. The overall SES-CD score ranges from 0 to 56 and is sum of 4 variables across 5 bowel segments. Higher scores indicate more severe disease.
  • Percentage of Participants Exhibiting Corticosteroid-free Clinical Remission in Participants who Were Taking Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on the CDAI at Week 52 [Week 52]: Percentage of participants using oral corticosteroids at baseline who have discontinued corticosteroids and are in clinical remission at Week 52 per CDAI will be reported. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI consist of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity
  • Percentage of Participants Exhibiting a Clinical Response Based on the CDAI at Week 52 [Week 52]: Clinical response is defined as >=100-point decrease from baseline in CDAI score. CDAI assesses CD based on clinical signs such as number of liquid or very soft stools, abdominal pain, general wellbeing, extra-intestinal manifestations of CD, antidiarrheal use, presence of abdominal mass, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI consist of eight factors, each summed after adjustment with a weighting factor. Total score ranges from 0 to 600 points. Higher scores indicate more severity.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

1. The participant has a diagnosis of CD established at least 3 months before screening by clinical and endoscopic evidence and corroborated by a histopathology report.
2. The participant has a confirmed diagnosis of moderately to severely active CD as assessed by CDAI of 220-450.
3. The participant has evidence of mucosal inflammation based on the SES-CD: SES-CD score of >=6 (or >=4 for participants with isolated ileal disease), as confirmed by a central reader.
4. The participant has demonstrated an inadequate response to, loss of response to, or intolerance to corticosteroids, immunomodulators, or biologic therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. The participant has a current diagnosis of ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.
2. The participant has infection(s) requiring treatment with IV anti-infectives within 30 days prior to baseline or oral/intramuscular anti-infectives within 14 days prior to baseline.
3. The participant has evidence of an active infection during the screening period, or clinically significant infection within 30 days prior to screening, or ongoing chronic infection.
4. The participant has a history of recurrent or disseminated (including a single episode) herpes zoster, or disseminated (including a single episode) herpes simplex.
5. The participant has any of the following ongoing known complications of CD: abscess (abdominal or peri-anal); symptomatic bowel strictures; 2 entire missing segments of the following 5 segments: terminal ileum, right colon, transverse colon, sigmoid and left colon, and rectum; fulminant colitis; toxic megacolon; or any other manifestation that might require surgery while enrolled in the study.
6. The participant has an ostomy or ileoanal pouch.
7. The participant has severe renal impairment, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meters (mL/min/1.73 m\^2).
8. The participant has severe (Child-Pugh C) hepatic impairment.

+Locations (138)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
UCSD Medical CenterLa Jolla, CaliforniaUnited StatesNot yet recruiting
Keck Medicine Of USC - USC Healthcare Center 1Los Angeles, CaliforniaUnited StatesNot yet recruiting
Peak Gastroenterology AssociatesColorado Springs, ColoradoUnited StatesRecruiting
GI PROS, Inc.Naples, FloridaUnited StatesActive not recruiting
Orlando Health Ambulatory Care CenterOrlando, FloridaUnited StatesActive not recruiting
USF Health Morsani Center for Advanced HealthcareTampa, FloridaUnited StatesActive not recruiting
Indiana University (IU) Health University HospitalIndianapolis, IndianaUnited StatesActive not recruiting
University of KentuckyLexington, KentuckyUnited StatesActive not recruiting
Mount Sinai Hospital - The Susan and Leonard Feinstein Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Clinical CenterNew York, New YorkUnited StatesActive not recruiting
Columbia University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian HospitalNew York, New YorkUnited StatesNot yet recruiting
Lenox Hill Hospital Northwell HealthNew York, New YorkUnited StatesActive not recruiting
Gastroenterology AssociatesGreenville, South CarolinaUnited StatesActive not recruiting
Rapid City Medical CenterRapid City, South DakotaUnited StatesActive not recruiting
Southern Star Research Institute, LLCSan Antonio, TexasUnited StatesRecruiting
Tyler Research Institute, LLCTyler, TexasUnited StatesRecruiting
Virginia Mason Medical CenterSeattle, WashingtonUnited StatesActive not recruiting
Swedish Cancer InstituteSeattle, WashingtonUnited StatesNot yet recruiting
University of Washington Medical Center - MontlakeSeattle, WashingtonUnited StatesNot yet recruiting
Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center - Froedtert HospitalMilwaukee, WisconsinUnited StatesNot yet recruiting
Medizinische Universitaet Wien - Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien (AKH) - Universitaetsklinik fuer Innere Medizin IIIVienna, State of ViennaAustriaNot yet recruiting
Medical University InnsbruckInnsbruck, TyrolAustriaNot yet recruiting
Johannes Kepler Universitat Linz (JKU)LinzAustriaNot yet recruiting
Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Innere Medizin I, Labor im ErdgeschossSalzburgAustriaNot yet recruiting
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brueder WienViennaAustriaNot yet recruiting
Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles/ Academisch Ziekenhuis BrusselBrussels, AnderlechtBelgiumNot yet recruiting
Imelda GI Clinical Research CenterBonheidenBelgiumActive not recruiting
Universitair Ziekenhuis GentGhentBelgiumNot yet recruiting
University Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgiumNot yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Chretien MontLegiaLiègeBelgiumNot yet recruiting
Hospital Universitario CajuruCuritiba, ParanáBrazilNot yet recruiting
Faculdade de Medicina de BotucatuBotucatu, São PauloBrazilNot yet recruiting
Centro de Estudos Clinico do Interior Paulista - CECIPJaú, São PauloBrazilNot yet recruiting
Pesquisare SaudeSanto André, São PauloBrazilNot yet recruiting
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)-Hospital Universitario Clementino Fraga Filho (HUCFF)Rio de JaneiroBrazilNot yet recruiting
Hospital das Clinicas of the University of Sao Paulo (Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HC/FMUSP))São PauloBrazilNot yet recruiting
Unidade de Pesquisa Clinica UPC Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto da Universidade de Sao PauloSão PauloBrazilNot yet recruiting
Heritage Medical Research Clinic - University Of CalgaryCalgary, AlbertaCanadaActive not recruiting
University of Manitoba-Winnipeg Regional Health Authority-Health Sciences CentreWinnipeg, ManitobaCanadaNot yet recruiting
Dalhousie UniversityHalifax, Nova ScotiaCanadaNot yet recruiting
Barrie GI AssociatesBarrie, OntarioCanadaRecruiting
McMaster University - Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute (FFDHRI)Hamilton, OntarioCanadaActive not recruiting
Taunton Surgical Centre-Oshawa ClinicOshawa, OntarioCanadaRecruiting
Toronto Immune and Digestive Health Institute (TIDHI)Toronto, OntarioCanadaRecruiting
Toronto Digestive Disease AssociatesVaughan, OntarioCanadaNot yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de MontrealMontreal, QuebecCanadaNot yet recruiting
Poliklinika Borzan d.o.o.OsijekCroatiaNot yet recruiting
Clinical Hospital Center RijekaRijekaCroatiaActive not recruiting
University Hospital Centre Sestre MilosrdniceZagrebCroatiaNot yet recruiting
Nemocnice Ceske Budejovice, a.s.České BudějoviceCzechiaNot yet recruiting
Fakultni Nemocnice Hradec KraloveHradec KrálovéCzechiaNot yet recruiting
Hepato-Gastroenterologie HK, s.r.o.Hradec KrálovéCzechiaNot yet recruiting
IBD Clinical and Research centrePragueCzechiaNot yet recruiting
Aalborg HospitalAalborgDenmarkNot yet recruiting
Hvidovre Hospital Medicinsk Gastroenterologisk AfdelingHvidovreDenmarkNot yet recruiting
CHU d'Amiens-Picardie - Hopital SUDAmiensFranceNot yet recruiting
Hopital Huriez - CHRU de LilleLilleFranceNot yet recruiting
Chu - Hopital NordMarseilleFranceNot yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (CHU de Nantes) - Hopital Hotel DieuNantesFranceActive not recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux - Hopital Haut-LevequePessacFranceActive not recruiting
CHU St Etienne Hopital NordSaint-EtienneFranceNot yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Toulouse - Hopital RangueilToulouseFranceActive not recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Nancy, Hopital BraboisVandœuvre-lès-NancyFranceNot yet recruiting
Krankenhaus Waldfriede e.V.BerlinGermanyNot yet recruiting
Agaplesion Markus KrankenhausFrankfurt am MainGermanyNot yet recruiting
Studiengesellschaft BSFHalleGermanyNot yet recruiting
Universitaetsklinikum JenaJenaGermanyNot yet recruiting
Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, UKSH-Campus KielKielGermanyNot yet recruiting
St. Marien- und St. AnnastiftskrankenhausLudwigshafenGermanyNot yet recruiting
Universitaetsklinikum Mannheim (Umm) - Ii Medizinische KlinikMannheimGermanyNot yet recruiting
University of Athens School of Medicine, Alexandra General HospitalAthens, AtticaGreeceNot yet recruiting
Metaxa Cancer HospitalPiraeus, AtticaGreeceNot yet recruiting
University Hospital of HeraklionHeraklion, CreteGreeceNot yet recruiting
Central Hospital of Northern Pest - Military HospitalBudapestHungaryNot yet recruiting
Semmelweis EgyetemBudapestHungaryNot yet recruiting
Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem Altalanos Orvostudomanyi Kar Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont, I.Sz. Belogyaszati KlinikaSzegedHungaryNot yet recruiting
Adelaide, Meath and National Children's HospitalDublinIrelandNot yet recruiting
University College Dublin (UCD) - St. Vincent's University Hospital (SVUH)DublinIrelandNot yet recruiting
Beaumont HospitalDublinIrelandNot yet recruiting
Soroka Medical CenterBeershebaIsraelNot yet recruiting
Rambam Health Care Campus (RHCC)HaifaIsraelNot yet recruiting
Meir Medical CenterKfar SabaIsraelNot yet recruiting
Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Campus (Beilinson and Hasharon Hospital)Petah TikvaIsraelNot yet recruiting
The Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsraelNot yet recruiting
Ospedale San Raffaele (HSR) Instituto Scientifico Universitario San RaffaeleMilanItalyNot yet recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Federico II di NapoliNaplesItalyNot yet recruiting
A. Gemelli University Hospital, Catholic University of the Sacred HeartRomaItalyNot yet recruiting
Humanitas Clinical And Research InstituteRozzanoItalyNot yet recruiting
Fondazione IRCSS Casa Sollievo Della SofferenzaSan Giovanni RotondoItalyNot yet recruiting
AO Ordine Mauriziano di TorinoTorinoItalyNot yet recruiting
Amsterdam UMC Research BVAmsterdamNetherlandsNot yet recruiting
Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenNetherlandsNot yet recruiting
Erasmus Medisch CentrumRotterdamNetherlandsNot yet recruiting
Elisabeth TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (ETZ)TilburgNetherlandsNot yet recruiting
Vestre Viken HF - Baerum SykehusDrammen, GjettumNorwayNot yet recruiting
Haukeland Universitetssjukehus (Haukeland University Hospital)BergenNorwayNot yet recruiting
Akershus University HospitalLorenskogNorwayNot yet recruiting
Oslo Universitetssykehus HF, UllevalOsloNorwayNot yet recruiting
Oddzial Kliniczny Gastroenterologii Ogolnej i Onkologicznej SPZOZ Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny Nr 1 im. Barlickiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w LodziLodzPolandNot yet recruiting
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Im. H. Swiecickiego UmPoznanPolandNot yet recruiting
H-T. Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o. Sp.k.TychyPolandNot yet recruiting

38 more sites not listed.

+Publications

  • Results publication: Danese S, Sands BE, Feagan BG, Jairath V, Panaccione R, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Irving PM, Schreiber S, Dotan I, Ferrante M, D'Haens GR, Jones S, Freire M, Lindner D, Adsul S, Oberai P, Colombel JF. Design and rationale for the VICTRIVA study: A randomized, double-blind, phase 3b study of vedolizumab in combination with upadacitinib in Crohn's disease. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Nov 24;48:101574. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101574. eCollection 2025 Dec. PMID 41403476

+Investigators

  • Study Director, Study director, Takeda

+Funding

NIH grants: 2023