Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Recurrent and Persistant Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

NCT05922774 — Unknown, 70 participants, Haseki Training and Research Hospital

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Evaluation of Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Recurrent and Persistant Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

RegistryNCT05922774
StatusUnknown
Study typeObservational
Enrollment70 (Estimated)
SponsorHaseki Training and Research Hospital (Other)
ConditionsBenign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo
InterventionsCervical VEMP testing (Device)
Datesstart 2023-06-19, primary completion 2023-12-25 (estimated), completion 2024-03-01 (estimated), first posted 2023-06-28, last updated 2023-07-20
Locations1 site in Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo All trials of Cervical VEMP testing

-Summary

The goal of this observational study is to compare the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in recurrent/persistant BPPV and nonrecurrent BPPV. Recurrent/persistant BPPV is considered as the patients who require more than one repositioning manuever for the resolution of symptoms and the recurrent cases in the first three months after the diagnosis.

The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

* Is there any difference between the cVEMP findings of diseased ears of recurrent and nonrecurrent BPPV cases?
* Is there any difference between the cVEMP findings of diseased ears and healthy ears of BPPV patients
* Is there any difference between the cVEMP findings of healthy ears of recurrent and nonrecurrent BPPV cases and healthy controls?

Patients with VNG confirmed BPPV will be recruited and CVEMP test will be performed before the therapeutic manuevers.

Control visits will be scheduled on the 7th day after the therateutic menuevers are performed.

Patients will be followed-up for 4 weeks after the resolution of symptoms. Researchers will compare recurrent (Group 1), nonrecurrent (group 2) BPPV patients and healthy controls (Group 3) to see if there is any difference between the cVEMP findings of two groups.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Group 1Device: Cervical VEMP testingPatients with recurrent BPPV
Group 2Device: Cervical VEMP testingPatients with non recurrent BPPV
Group 3Device: Cervical VEMP testingHealthy controls
  • Cervical VEMP testing (Device): cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • The comparison of cVEMP findings in normal controls and BPPV patients with nonrecurrent and recurrent BPPV symptoms after 4 week follow-up. [13 weeks]: Patients with VNG confirmed BPPV will be recruited and CVEMP test will be performed before the therapeutic manuevers. Control visits will be scheduled on the 7th day after the therapeutic menuevers are performed. Patients will be followed-up for 4 weeks after the resolution of symptoms. Researchers will compare recurrent (Group 1), nonrecurrent (group 2) BPPV patients and healthy controls (Group 3) to see if there is any difference between the cVEMP findings of these groups.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 65 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

\- Patients admitted to ENT clinic with unilateral posterior or lateral canal BPPV for the first time

Exclusion Criteria:

* patients with bilateral BPPV
* patients with recurrent or resistant BPPV
* patients with spontaneous nystagmus
* vestibular or neurologic disorders other than BPPV
* patients who use medication which may affect the vestibular system or muscle tone
* cervical muscle disorders and ocular pathologies which may affect the VEMP results

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Haseki Training and Research HospitalIstanbulTurkey (Türkiye)Recruiting

+Publications

  • Karatas A, Yuce T, Cebi IT, Acar Yuceant G, Haci C, Salviz M. Evaluation of Cervical Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potential Findings in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo. J Int Adv Otol. 2016 Dec;12(3):316-320. doi: 10.5152/iao.2016.2170. Epub 2016 Aug 1. PMID 28031157
  • Yetiser S, Ince D, Gul M. An analysis of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2014 Oct;123(10):686-95. doi: 10.1177/0003489414532778. Epub 2014 May 1. PMID 24789801
  • Xu H, Liang FY, Chen L, Song XC, Tong MC, Thong JF, Zhang QQ, Sun Y. Evaluation of the utricular and saccular function using oVEMPs and cVEMPs in BPPV patients. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Feb 9;45:12. doi: 10.1186/s40463-016-0125-7. PMID 26857819
  • Kim EJ, Oh SY, Kim JS, Yang TH, Yang SY. Persistent otolith dysfunction even after successful repositioning in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. J Neurol Sci. 2015 Nov 15;358(1-2):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Sep 5. PMID 26371697
  • Vaduva C, Esteban-Sanchez J, Sanz-Fernandez R, Martin-Sanz E. Prevalence and management of post-BPPV residual symptoms. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jun;275(6):1429-1437. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4980-x. Epub 2018 Apr 23. PMID 29687182