To Compare the Efficacy and Safety of the ATEV With AVF in Female Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Hemodialysis

NCT05908084 — Phase 3, Active not recruiting, 121 participants, Humacyte, Inc.

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Phase 3 Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of the Humacyte Acellular Tissue Engineered Vessel (ATEV) With That of an Autogenous Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) in Female Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Hemodialysis

RegistryNCT05908084
StatusActive not recruiting
PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment
Enrollment121 (Actual)
SponsorHumacyte, Inc. (Industry); collaborators: IQVIA Biotech
ConditionsEnd Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)
InterventionsAcellular Tissue Engineered Vessel (ATEV), AVF (Biological, other)
Datesstart 2023-09-07, primary completion 2027-06-01 (estimated), completion 2028-06-01 (estimated), first posted 2023-06-18, last updated 2026-06-26
Locations32 sites in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) All trials of Acellular Tissue Engineered Vessel (ATEV) All trials of AVF

-Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the number of catheter-free days (CFD) and the rate and severity of any dialysis access-related infections between the ATEV and AVF groups over 12 months in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) needing hemodialysis (HD).

Participants will be stratified by location of the vascular access (forearm versus upper arm) and by type of AVF creation procedure planned by the surgeon at randomization (1-stage AVF versus 2-stage AVF). The comparator is an upper extremity arterio-venous fistula (AVF) for HD access surgically created per the institution's Standard of Care (SoC).

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, two-arm, comparative Phase 3 study of female patients with ESRD, who are receiving clinically successful hemodialysis (HD) via a central venous dialysis catheter (DC).

Approximately 150 female patients will be randomized 1:1 to either the ATEV or the AVF treatment arm. Patients will be stratified by location of the vascular access (forearm versus upper arm) and by type of AVF creation procedure planned by the surgeon at randomization (1-stage AVF versus 2-stage AVF).

All patients will be followed through Month 12 regardless of SA patency status. Patients who have a patent SA at Month 12 will then be followed in the Long-Term Extension study for an additional 12 months with evaluation of exploratory long-term endpoints.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
ATEV treatment armExperimentalBiological: Acellular Tissue Engineered Vessel (ATEV)ATEV will be implanted as an arterio-venous (AV) access into the forearm or upper arm
AVF treatment armActive comparatorOther: AVFAVF creation procedure (1-stage AVF or 2-stage AVF) as an arterio-venous (AV) access into the forearm or upper arm
  • Acellular Tissue Engineered Vessel (ATEV) (Biological), also known as Human Acellular Vessel (HAV): ATEV implantation
  • AVF (Other): AVF creation procedure

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • The number of catheter-free days since randomization to Month 12. [12 months]: To determine the number of days free from indwelling catheter (catheter-free days) since randomization to 365 days (Month 12), or until SA abandonment, whichever occurs first.
  • The rate of infections related to any HD access. [12 months]: To determine the rate of infections, related to any HD access over the period from SA creation (Day 1) until 12 months (365 days) after SA placement, without regard to SA abandonment.

Secondary outcomes

  • The number of catheter-free days since randomization to Month 6. [6 months]: To determine the number of days free from indwelling catheter (catheter-free days) from randomization to 183 days (Month 6), or until SA abandonment, whichever occurs first.
  • The number of days of the study access (SA) functional patency [12 months]: To determine the number of days of Duration of functional patency of the SA over 12 months from randomization.
  • The rate of the study access (SA) secondary patency [6 - 12 months]: To determine the rate of the SA secondary patency at 6 and 12 months from randomization.
  • The number of days from the study access (SA) maturation to abandonment [12 months]: To determine the number of days from the study access (SA) maturation to abandonment.
  • The rate of complications related to any HD access after the study access (SA) creation. [12 months]: To determine the rate of complications related to any HD access during the 12 months after SA creation, without regard to SA abandonment. For the purposes of this endpoint, HD access refers to any surgically created access or device to provide a route for HD after randomization (e.g., SA, new AVF or AVG, or catheter).

Other outcomes

  • Incidence rate of HD access-related interventions [12 months]: Incidence rate of HD access-related interventions over the period from randomization until SA abandonment, or a defined timepoint after randomization (e.g., 12 months).
  • The number of days from randomization to first day of functional dialysis [12 months]: To determine the number of days from randomization to the first day of functional dialysis using the SA.
  • Incidence rate of Study Access (SA) abandonment [12 months]: To determine the incidence rate of SA abandonment.
  • Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients (a scale from 0 to 45, with higher scores meaning best outcome) [12 months]: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients using the PROMIS-10 Questionnaire, a scale from 0 to 45, where the higher scores mean the best outcome.
  • Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ) score (range 0-68 with higher scores mean worst outcome). [12 months]: Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ) Questionnaire. The Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ) is a patient reported outcome instrument containing 17 items pertaining to the impact of 17 access-related problems. Responses to the questionnaire are summed to produce a total VAQ score (range from 0-68) with higher values indicating more negative views of vascular access.
  • The incidence rate of aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm [12 months]: To determine the incidence rate of clinically significant aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm of the SA over the period from SA creation to 12 months.
  • The incidence rate of adverse events (AEs) [12 months]: To determine the incidence rate of adverse events (AEs) from SA creation to 12 months.

+Eligibility

Sex: Female, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Female patients with ESRD, currently receiving hemodialysis via dialysis catheter and who are candidates for the creation of an AVF (see Inclusion Criterion #4 below) or implantation of an ATEV for HD access.
2. Patients who plan to undergo HD at a dialysis unit of a participating dialysis provider for at least 12 months after SA creation.
3. Patients aged ≥ 18 years at Screening.
4. Suitable anatomy for creation of a forearm or upper arm AVF and for implantation of straight, curved, or looped ATEV in either the forearm or upper arm.

   NOTE: Suitable anatomy will be determined by both physical examination and ultrasound imaging or vessel imaging modality in addition to consideration of all vascular sites available, prior access failure, future access sites and possibilities to preserve patients' future alternate accesses. Vessel mapping is the preferred method to assess the vascular anatomy, and will evaluate the following attributes during Screening:
   * Vein diameter
   * Arterial diameter
   * Presence of arterial calcification
   * Depth of the intended fistula conduit from the surface of the skin
   * Central vein patency
   * Previous vascular access location The ultimate decision of anatomic suitability belongs to the surgeon and/or the investigator.
5. Hemoglobin ≥ 7 g/dL and platelet count ≥ 100,000 /mm3
6. Patients must either:

   1. Be of non-childbearing potential, which is defined as post-menopausal (at least 1 year without menses prior to Screening) or documented surgically sterile (i.e., total hysterectomy or tubal ligation, or complete bilateral oophorectomy) at least 1 month prior to Screening.
   2. Or, if of childbearing potential:

   Must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening, and

   Must agree to use at least one form of the following birth control methods for the duration of the study:

   i. Established use of oral, injectable or implanted hormonal methods of contraception.

   ii. Placement of an intrauterine device or intrauterine system at least 5 days prior to Screening.

   iii. Barrier methods of contraception: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with spermicidal foam/ gel/ film/ cream/ suppository.
7. Patient or their legal representative can communicate effectively with investigative staff, is competent and willing to give written informed consent, and able to comply with entire study procedures including all scheduled follow-up visits.
8. Life expectancy of at least 1 year confirmed by Charlson Comorbidity Index ≤ 9.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Male sex at birth.
2. Planned AVF creation by means other than suture or vascular anastomotic clips (e.g., endovascular surgery or other anastomotic creation devices). Venous outflow from study access cannot be located more distally than the venous outflow of any previous failed access in that extremity.
3. Known serious allergy or intolerance to aspirin and alternative antiplatelet therapy.
4. Pregnancy, or women intending to become pregnant during the course of the trial.
5. Treatment with any investigational drug or device within 60 days or 5 half-lives after taking the last dose (whichever is longer) prior to study entry (Day 1) or ongoing participation in a clinical trial of an investigational product.
6. Documented hyper-coagulable state, as defined as either:

   1. Documented hyper-coagulable state, as defined as either: A biochemical diagnosis (e.g., Factor V Leiden, Protein C deficiency, etc.) - OR -
   2. A clinical history of thrombophilia as diagnosed by 2 or more spontaneous intravascular thrombotic events (e.g., deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), etc.) within the previous 5 years.
7. Spontaneous or unexplained bleeding diathesis clinically documented within the last 5 years or a biochemical diagnosis (e.g., von Willebrand's disease, etc.).
8. Cancer actively being treated with a cytotoxic agent.
9. Planned or anticipated renal transplant within 6 months after randomization.
10. Any other condition that in the judgment of the investigator would preclude adequate evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the SA.
11. Previous exposure to ATEV.
12. Any of the following within 8 weeks prior to screening: acute coronary syndrome, stroke or congestive heart failure NYHA Stage IV
13. Employees of Humacyte and employees or relatives of an investigator.

+Locations (32)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Honor Health Scottsdale Shea Medical CenterScottsdale, ArizonaUnited States
El Centro Regional Medical CenterEl Centro, CaliforniaUnited States
Jacob's Medical Center at UC San Diego HealthLa Jolla, CaliforniaUnited States
Denver Health and Hospital AuthorityDenver, ColoradoUnited States
Yale New Haven HospitalNew Haven, ConnecticutUnited States
Access Research InstituteBrooksville, FloridaUnited States
University of FL Health Heart and Vascular HospitalGainesville, FloridaUnited States
Mayo Clinic FloridaJacksonville, FloridaUnited States
American Access Care of Miami, LLCMiami, FloridaUnited States
USF Health South TampaTampa, FloridaUnited States
Georgia NephrologyAtlanta, GeorgiaUnited States
Grady Memorial HospitalAtlanta, GeorgiaUnited States
IU Health Bloomington HospitalBloomington, IndianaUnited States
John Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimore, MarylandUnited States
Brigham and Women's HospitalBoston, MassachusettsUnited States
Boston Medical CenterBoston, MassachusettsUnited States
University of MichiganAnn Arbor, MichiganUnited States
Rutgers University_MedicalNewark, New JerseyUnited States
St.Joseph's University Medical CenterPaterson, New JerseyUnited States
Capital Health Medical Center- HopewellPennington, New JerseyUnited States
New York-Presbyterian Queens_The Lang Center for Research & EducationFlushing, New YorkUnited States
Ambulatory Care Pavilion Westchester Medical CenterValhalla, New YorkUnited States
Surgical Specialists of CharlotteCharlotte, North CarolinaUnited States
Duke Regional HospitalDurham, North CarolinaUnited States
Wake Forest University School of Medicine_Atrium Health Wake Forest BaptistWinston-Salem, North CarolinaUnited States
Temple UniversityPhiladelphia, PennsylvaniaUnited States
University of Tennessee Medical CenterKnoxville, TennesseeUnited States
Dell Seton Medical Center at The University of Texas at AustinAustin, TexasUnited States
Dr. Ruben Villa__NephrologyLubbock, TexasUnited States
Cataract & Surgery Center LubbockLubbock, TexasUnited States
San Antonio Vascular and Endovascular Clinic PLLCSan Antonio, TexasUnited States
The San Antonio Vascular and Endovascular ClinicSan Antonio, TexasUnited States

+Publications

  • Results publication: Quinn RR, Oliver MJ, Wald R, Hiremath S, Pauly RP, Miller L, Barrett B, Nesrallah G, Gallagher M, Kotwal S, Gray NA, Hassan HC, Talaulikar GS, Thorpe K, Graham J, Clarke A, Bian J, MacRae J, Santana M, Bohm C, Mamdani M, Nagpal S, Yilmaz S, Moist L, Ravani P. Comparing Catheters with Fistulas in Older Patients Starting Hemodialysis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2026 Jun 22. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000001160. Online ahead of print. PMID 42319856