Contrasting Dosivent With Plus Flow Vu Spacer in Bronchial Hyperreactivity Participants

NCT05821868 — Not applicable, Completed, 50 participants, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Contrasting Dosivent Spacer Device With Plus Flow Vu Spacer in Bronchial Hyperreactivity Participants

RegistryNCT05821868
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; non randomized, crossover, masking: none, diagnostic
Enrollment50 (Actual)
SponsorHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon (Other)
ConditionsBronchial Hyperreactivity, Inhalant Use
InterventionsDosivent, Aerochamber Plus Flow Vu (Device)
Datesstart 2022-07-01, primary completion 2023-07-01, completion 2023-09-01, first posted 2023-04-20, last updated 2023-09-29
Locations1 site in Spain

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Bronchial Hyperreactivity All trials for Inhalant Use All trials of Dosivent All trials of Aerochamber Plus Flow Vu

-Summary

This study aims to compare the efficacy, as measured by changes in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC), of salbutamol inhaled with the Dosivent® chamber versus the widely used Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® in participants with a positive bronchodilator testing.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The investigators are conducting a non-randomized, open-label, crossover-controlled clinical trial in 50 participants with a previous positive bronchodilation testing. The protocol was approved by the local clinical ethics committee (code 03/2022). All participants provided written informed consent before any study procedure. During the study, the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the current standards of Good Clinical Practice were followed.

Participants over 18 years of age are included who attended our center for a bronchodilator test, gave a positive result in this test, and provided written informed consent for participation in this study. Participants are excluded if grade A quality spirometry was not obtained according to the classification in current regulations and, in the opinion of the investigator, performing a bronchodilator test could pose a risk to the participant or interrupting the usual bronchodilator treatment could worsen the underlying respiratory pathology.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu®Active comparatorDevice: Aerochamber Plus Flow Vu1\. Inhaled space chamber commonly use in our lung function lab for Bronchodilator Testing
DosiventExperimentalDevice: Dosivent2\. Newer and different inhaled space chamber for Bronchodilator Testing
  • Dosivent (Device): Dosivent® inhalation chamber is designed to optimize the delivery of inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids in the treatment of respiratory diseases
  • Aerochamber Plus Flow Vu (Device): Aerochamber Plus Flow Vu® inhalation chamber is also designed to optimize the delivery of inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids in the treatment of respiratory diseases

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Comparison of bronchodilator response in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in miliLiters between Dosivent® and Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® chambers in participants with bronchial hyperreactivity [12 months]: This study aim is to compare the efficacy, as measured by changes in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in mililiters of inhaled Salbutamol with the Dosivent® chamber versus the widely used Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® in participants with a positive Bronchodilator testing.
  • Comparison of bronchodilator response in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in percentage between Dosivent® and Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® chambers in participants with bronchial hyperreactivity [12 months]: This study aim is to compare the efficacy, as measured by changes in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in percentage of inhaled salbutamol with the Dosivent® chamber versus the widely used Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® in participants with a positive Bronchodilator testing.

Secondary outcomes

  • Comparison of bronchodilator response forced vital capacity (FVC) in miliLiters between Dosivent® and Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® chambers in participants with bronchial hyperreactivity [12 months]: This study aim is to compare the efficacy, as measured by changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) in mililiters,of inhaled Salbutamol with the Dosivent® chamber versus the widely used Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® in participants with a positive Bronchodilator testing.
  • Comparison of bronchodilator response forced vital capacity (FVC) in percentage between Dosivent® and Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® chambers in participants with bronchial hyperreactivity [12 months]: This study aim is to compare the efficacy, as measured by changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) in percentage,of inhaled Salbutamol with the Dosivent® chamber versus the widely used Aerochamber Plus® Flow-Vu® in participants with a positive Bronchodilator testing.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* Participants over 18 years of age
* Attending our center for a bronchodilator test
* Positive bronchodilator result with increase of Forced Expiratory Volume in first second greater than 200 mililiters and 12%
* Provided written informed consent for participation in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

* Grade A quality spirometry was not obtained according to the classification in current regulation
* Performing a bronchodilator test, in the opinion of the investigator, could pose a risk to the participant or interrupting the usual bronchodilator treatment could worsen the underlying respiratory pathology.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio MarañonMadridSpain

+Study documents