Diathermy vs Scalpel in Abdominal Incision in Women Undergoing CS

NCT05462418 — Not applicable, Unknown, 300 participants, Cairo University

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Diathermy Versus Scalpel in the Transverse Abdominal Incision in Primigravida Obese Women Undergoing Cesarean Section

RegistryNCT05462418
StatusUnknown
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: double, supportive care
Enrollment300 (Estimated)
SponsorCairo University (Other)
ConditionsIncision, Surgical
Interventionselectrosurgery, scalpel (Procedure)
Datesstart 2022-07-15, primary completion 2023-01-15 (estimated), completion 2023-02-15 (estimated), first posted 2022-07-18, last updated 2022-07-18
Locations1 site in Egypt

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Incision, Surgical All trials of electrosurgery All trials of scalpel

-Summary

Cesarean section is surging worldwide. For an extended period of surgical practice, the scalpel has been well-known as a gold-standard tool for making surgical incisions. The diathermy, electrocautery, is a substitute.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
diathermy groupActive comparatorProcedure: electrosurgeryPatients' incisions are completed using the unipolar diathermy from Whiteline until we reach the parietal peritoneum (cutting the Whiteline then coagulating until reaching the peritoneum). The used diathermy frequency was 50-70 MHz.
scalpelActive comparatorProcedure: scalpelpatients had their incisions completed using the surgical scalpel till we reach the parietal peritoneum.
  • electrosurgery (Procedure), also known as diathermy: incisions completed using use the unipolar diathermy from Whiteline till we reach the parietal peritoneum (cutting the Whiteline then coagulation till reaching the peritoneum). The used diathermy frequency was 50-70 MHz.
  • scalpel (Procedure): patients had their incisions completed using the surgical scalpel till we reach the parietal peritoneum.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • blood loss [30 min]: assess and compare intraoperative blood loss between both studied groups. This was done using visualization technique detecting numbers of fully soaked pads used during the incision.

+Eligibility

Sex: Female, ages: 20 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Women with BMI 30- 40 Kg/m2.
* Women pregnant with singletons and planned to have a repeat elective lower-segment CS at 38-39 weeks' gestation due to having had one previous CS.
* Women pregnant with singletons and planned to deliver by lower-segment CS at 38-39 weeks' gestation for the first time (primi-section) due to obstetric indication.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Cases with coagulopathies eg. Hemophilia, von Willebrand disease
* Cases on anti-coagulant therapy eg. Heparin, warfarin
* Cases with chronic diseases expected to affect wound healing, such as diabetes, hypertension, liver diseases, chronic anemia, and renal impairment.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
faculty of medicine - Cairo universityCairo, Kasr El AinyEgyptRecruiting

+Investigators