ACOART SCB BIF: Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesion by Sirolimus Coated Balloon vs Paclitaxel Coated Balloon

NCT04899583 — Not applicable, Unknown, 230 participants, Acotec Scientific Co., Ltd

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Prospective, Multicenter, Random Controlled Clinical Trail to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Sirolimus Coated Balloon Versus a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon in the Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesion

RegistryNCT04899583
StatusUnknown
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, treatment
Enrollment230 (Estimated)
SponsorAcotec Scientific Co., Ltd (Industry); collaborators: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
ConditionsCoronary Bifurcation Lesions
InterventionsSirolimus Coated Balloon Catheter, a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter (Device)
Datesstart 2021-11-10, primary completion 2024-11-01 (estimated), completion 2025-11-01 (estimated), first posted 2021-05-24, last updated 2023-11-29
Locations1 site in China

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions All trials of Sirolimus Coated Balloon Catheter All trials of a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter

-Summary

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesion with a sirolimus coated balloon versus a paclitaxel coated balloon. This trial is designed as prospective, multicenter, randomized and open-label.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Treatment GroupExperimentalDevice: Sirolimus Coated Balloon Cathetera Sirolimus Coated Balloon
Control GroupActive comparatorDevice: a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Cathetera Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter
  • Sirolimus Coated Balloon Catheter (Device): a Sirolimus Coated Balloon Catheter designed and produced by Acotec
  • a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter (Device): a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter(trade name:Bingo)

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Diameter stenosis rate of bifurcation lesion determinated by Digital Substraction Angiography (DSA) at 9 months post procedure. [9 months post procedure]: Defined as (1-minimum lumen diameter of target lesion/reference vessel diameter)*100% at 9 months post procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  • Rate of device success [Immediately after procedure]: Defined as the rate of successful delivery and withdrawal of the delivery catheter, and achieving a final in-lesion residual stenosis less than 30% and TIMI flow grade 3 by using the assigned device only.
  • Rate of lesion success [Immediately after procedure]: Defined as the rate of achieving a final in-lesion residual stenosis < 30% by visual estimate and TIMI flow grade 3 by using any percutaneous method.
  • Rate of procedure success [Immediately after procedure]: Defined as the rate of achieving lesion success without MACE (composite of cardiac death, MI and TLR events) .
  • Rate of target lesion failure (TLF) or device-related composite endpoints (DoCE) [30 days, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months post procedure]: Defined as a composite rate of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, or ischemia-driven TLR events at 30 days, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months post procedure.
  • Rate of patient-related composite endpoints (PoCE) [30 days, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months post procedure]: Defined as a composite rate of all cause death, all cause-related MI or TLR events at 30 days, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months post procedure.
  • Diameter stenosis rate [9 months post procedure]: Defined as the rate of restenosis (>50% diameter stenosis) of main vessel after 9 months at 9 months post procedure.
  • Late lumen loss (LLL) [9 months post procedure]: Defined as the difference of minimum lumen diameter (MLD) from post procedure to 9 months follow-up, including late lumen loss of main vessel and side branch.
  • Angiographic binary restenosis (ABR) rate [9 months post procedure]: Defined as the percentage rate of binary restenosis determined by angiographic at 9 months post procedure.
  • Rate of composite safety endpoint [12 months post procedure]: Defined as a composite rate of all-cause death, cardiogenic death, myocardial infarction, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, incidence of thrombotic events (acute, subacute, late) defined by ARC at 12 months post procedure.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Age ≥18 years old and ≤75 years old
* Diagnosed as stable or unstable angina pectoris, asymptomatic myocardial ischemia or old myocardial infarction, or recent myocardial infarction in stable stage.
* Eligible for balloon dilatation or stent implantation.
* Subject (or legal guardian) understands the study requirements and procedures and provides written Informed Consent before any study tests or procedures are performed

Exclusion Criteria:

* AMI occurred within 7 days before operation
* The subjects had congestive heart failure or the heart function was classified as NYHA/KillipIV.
* Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35%
* History of heart transplantation
* The subjects had severe arrhythmias, such as high-risk ventricular extrasystole and / or ventricular tachycardia.
* The subjects had stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding or active ulcers, or had a high risk of bleeding in the past 6 months.
* Active bleeding physique or blood coagulation disorder
* Known renal insufficiency(eGFR<30ml/min)
* Contraindicated to anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents
* Has a history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 6 months before enrollment.
* Has contraindications for coronary artery bypass grafting
* known to be allergic to aspirin, heparin, contrast agents, paclitaxel and sirolimus
* Life expectancy less than 12 months, or unable to complete a 12-month follow-up
* Pregnant or lactating females, or who plan to become pregnant during a follow-up period of 1 year after operation
* The subjects have participated in other drug property studies or device studies that have not yet completed the main end point.

Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:

* One target lesion (bifurcation lesion) in the coronary artery is allowed, and if there are coexistent non-bifurcated lesions requiring PCI intervention, only one lesion was accepted at most, and the target lesion should be treated after successful PCI treatment of non-target lesion.
* Target Lesion located in native coronary artery must be de novo
* Medina classification should be (1.1.1, 1.0.1, 0.1.1)
* Main branch of target lesion (%DS is ≥70% or ≥50% with clinical symptoms ) is suitable for stent implantation
* Target Lesion located in main branch should be covered by DES. Moreover, the residual stenosis ≤ 30%, TIMI flow is 3, no complications and branch vessel opening stenosis ≥ 70%.
* Reference vessel diameter of the branch is 2.0-4.0mm (by visual)
* Target lesion length ≤ 36mm (by visual)

Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:

* Target or non-target lesion located in left main
* Subjects who have non-target lesions of bifurcation
* The target lesion is trifurcation or multifurcation lesion.
* Main branch of target lesion located within 3 mm from the ostium of LAD or LCx or RCA
* The branch lesion is a diffuse long lesion, which could't covered by one DCB.
* Main or side branch is occlusive lesion, which TIMI flow is 0.
* Aneurysm existed in the blood vessel at the target lesion
* Side branch severely calcified or tortuous
* The blood pressure was too low to tolerate intracoronary injection of ≥ 100ug nitroglycerin
* Failure pre-dilatation of the side branch ostium (residual stenosis > 30% ,the blood flow in TIMI is not up to grade 3, or has dissection of type C or above according to NHLBI grade)

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan UniversityShanghai, Shanghai MunicipalityChinaRecruiting

+Investigators

  • Ge Junbo, Principal investigator, Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital