Photobiomodulation Protocols in the Analgesia of Chemotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis in Children

NCT04596410 — Not applicable, Unknown, 406 participants, University Hospital, Toulouse

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Double-blind, Randomized, Multi-center, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial Comparing Two Photobiomodulation Protocols in the Analgesia of Chemotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis in Children

RegistryNCT04596410, acronym CURALASE01
StatusUnknown
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: triple, treatment
Enrollment406 (Estimated)
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Toulouse (Other)
ConditionsMucositis Oral
InterventionsLLLT applied every other day, LLLT applied daily (Radiation)
Datesstart 2021-05-03, primary completion 2024-01-01 (estimated), completion 2024-02-01 (estimated), first posted 2020-10-22, last updated 2023-09-22
Locations16 sites in France

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Mucositis Oral All trials of LLLT applied every other day All trials of LLLT applied daily

-Summary

Chemotherapy-induced oropharyngeal mucositis (OM) negatively impacts the quality of life of adult and pediatric patients by causing pain, dysphagia, dysgeusia and dysphonia.

Photobiomodulation (PBM) by low level laser therapy (LLLT), light therapy of low level of red and infrared wavelengths (630-1000 nm) has been recommended since 2014 in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy for bone marrow transplantation. Available pediatric studies highlighted positive/promising results of PBM with excellent safety and no adverse effects. Nevertheless, a wide variety of application parameters is described in the literature, with no consensus guidelines.

Considering the lack of standardized protocol of photobiomodulation in the pediatric population as well as the burden and cost of a daily application, investigators have decided to conduct, for the first time in children of 3 years of age or older, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial to compare two PBM protocols with same PBM parameters, combining red and infrared wavelengths, but with different frequencies of laser application (daily versus every other day), in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced OM of WHO grade 2 or higher.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
LLLT applied every other dayExperimentalRadiation: LLLT applied every other dayLow-level laser therapy (LLLT) protocol combining red and infrared wavelengths applied every other day
LLLT applied dailyActive comparatorRadiation: LLLT applied dailyLow-level laser therapy (LLLT) protocol combining red and infrared wavelengths applied every day
  • LLLT applied every other day (Radiation): Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) protocol combining red and infrared wavelengths applied every other day
  • LLLT applied daily (Radiation): Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) protocol combining red and infrared wavelengths applied daily

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Session evaluation [Throught treatment period up to 1 month]: Duration (in days) from the day of first PBM session up to the day of first measurement when patient has no longer WHO grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-induced OM related pain at 2 consecutive measurements before the next scheduled PBM session (either active laser application or matching placebo application)

Secondary outcomes

  • Production costs evaluation [2 months]: Production costs from the hospital perspective and efficacy (i.e. number of days after which a child has no longer mucositis related pain as described in the primary endpoint section) to build Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) comparing every other day LLLT application versus with daily LLLT application.
  • Health insurance evaluation [2 months]: Costs of inpatient hospital stays from the French health insurance perspective.
  • OM duration evaluation [Throught treatment period up to 1 month]: Duration (in days) of chemotherapy-induced OM of WHO grade 2 or higher between the day of first PBM session up to the day of first measurement when patient has no longer WHO grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-induced OM at 2 consecutive measurements before the next scheduled PBM session (either every other day application or daily application).
  • OM occurrence [2 months]: Occurrence of chemotherapy-induced OM of WHO grade 3 or 4 (deterioration of the clinical situation).
  • Feed evaluation [2 months]: Occurrence of enteral feeding.
  • Analgesic consumption [2 months]: Duration (in days) of consumption of step 2 and step 3 analgesics during chemotherapy-induced OM of WHO grade 2 or higher.
  • PBM evaluation [Through treatment period up to 1 month]: Duration (in days) from the day of first PBM session up to the day of first measurement when patient has no longer WHO grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-induced OM related pain at 2 consecutive measurements before the next scheduled PBM session (either active laser application or matching placebo application) as evaluated, regardless of patient's age, with the ChIMES scale and use of step 3 analgesics.
  • Pain change evaluation [From baseline to each day of PBM session]: Change over time in WHO grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-induced OM related pain, as assessed by pain scales (HEDEN (Hétero Evaluation Douleur Enfant) mucositis scale (5 items ranging from 0 to 2) or VAS (ranging from 0 to 10)depending on patient's age category, and Children's International Mucositis Evaluation Scale (4 items ranging from 0 to 5) whatever patient's age category)
  • Adverse events occurrence [2 months]: Occurrence of adverse events reported according to descriptions and grading scale found in NCI CTCAE version 5.0.
  • thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) evolution [From baseline to 2 months]: TSH shift from baseline value classified according to the following three categories: "< 0.4 IU/mL", "\[0.4 - 10\] IU/mL", "> 10 IU/mL", to value at D14-31 after end of WHO grade 2 or higher chemotherapy-induced OM classified according to the same three categories.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 3 Years to 17 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Male or female children aged ≥ 3 years and < 18 years.
2. Hospitalization in an oncology or hematology department in the participating centres.
3. Patients with oropharyngeal mucositis of grade 2 or higher (WHO grading system) related to cancer chemotherapy, including conditioning for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT).
4. Written informed consent of both patient's holders of parental authority, and patient's assent when applicable.
5. Patients affiliated to a French Social Security insurance or equivalent social protection.
6. Absence of any physical or psychological disability that may interfere with the LLLT application.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with a solid cancer lesion in the area of low-level laser application.
2. History of cervicofacial radiotherapy.
3. Application of low-level laser therapy for oral mucositis within 2 weeks prior to randomization.
4. Hyperthyroidism defined by TSH < 0.4 IU/mL at inclusion.
5. Patients susceptible to epilepsy seizure.
6. Patients with pacemaker.
7. Patients refusing to wear retinal goggles during low-level laser 1. Patients with a solid cancer lesion in the area of low-level laser application.
8. Patients protected by law (guardianship and safeguarding of justice).
9. Pregnant female patients as determined by positive serum pregnancy test at screening.
10. Lactating female patients who are actively breast feeding.
11. Participation in another clinical trial involving oral care.

+Locations (16)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University hospital of ToulouseToulouse, OccitanieFranceRecruiting
University hospital of AngersAngersFranceRecruiting
University hospital of BesançonBesançonFranceRecruiting
University hospital of GrenobleGrenobleFranceRecruiting
University hospital of LilleLilleFranceRecruiting
University hospital of LimogesLimogesFranceRecruiting
Hôpital La TimoneMarseilleFranceRecruiting
University hospital of NancyNancyFranceRecruiting
University Hospital of NiceNiceFranceRecruiting
Armand Trousseau HospitalParisFranceRecruiting
University hospital of PoitiersPoitiersFranceRecruiting
University hospital of ReimsReimsFranceRecruiting
University hospital of RouenRouenFranceRecruiting
University hospital of Saint-EtienneSaint-EtienneFranceRecruiting
University hospital of StrasbourgStrasbourgFranceRecruiting
University Hospital of ToursToursFranceRecruiting

+Investigators

  • Marlène PASQUET, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Toulouse