A Study of Lurasidone Compared With Placebo for the Treatment of Bipolar I Depression

NCT04383691 — Phase 3, Terminated, 124 participants, Marubeni Pharmaceuticals (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Randomized, 6-Week, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Flexible Dose, Parallel-Group Study of Lurasidone for the Treatment of Bipolar I Depression

RegistryNCT04383691
StatusTerminated - Company's business decision
PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: quadruple, treatment
Enrollment124 (Actual)
SponsorMarubeni Pharmaceuticals (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. (Industry); collaborators: Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.
ConditionsBipolar I Depression
InterventionsLurasidone HCl, Placebo (Drug)
Datesstart 2020-12-11, primary completion 2022-12-23, completion 2022-12-23, first posted 2020-05-12, last updated 2023-01-17
Locations26 sites in China

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Bipolar I Depression All trials of Lurasidone HCl All trials of Placebo

-Summary

The study evaluates the efficacy and safety of lurasidone compared with placebo in treating Bipolar I Depression.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of lurasidone (20-120 mg/day) monotherapy with that of placebo in patients with Bipolar I Depression by assessing the change from baseline in the MADRS total score at Week 6.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
LurasidoneExperimentalDrug: Lurasidone HClSubjects will be administered orally, once daily, in the evening. Subjects will be treated with Lurasidone 20 mg/day for Days 1-2-3, 40 mg/day for Days 4-5-6, and 60 mg/day on Day 7. Flexible dosing of study drug will be permitted beginning on Day 8.
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorDrug: PlaceboSubjects will be administered orally, once daily, in the evening. Subjects will be treated with Placebo.
  • Lurasidone HCl (Drug): Subjects will be administered orally, once daily, in the evening. Subjects will be treated with Lurasidone 20 mg/day for Days 1-2-3, 40 mg/day for Days 4-5-6, and 60 mg/day on Day 7. Flexible dosing of study drug will be permitted beginning on Day 8.
  • Placebo (Drug): Subjects will be administered orally, once daily, in the evening. Subjects will be treated with Placebo.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Change from baseline in the MADRS total score at Week 6 [Baseline/ week 6]: Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)is a clinician-rated assessment of a subject's level of depression. The MADRS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60. For the MADRS total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome. The MADRS contains ten (10) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 10 items.

Secondary outcomes

  • Change from baseline in the CGI-BP-S (depression) score at Week 6 [Baseline/ week 6]: Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) score (depression) is a clinician-rated assessment of a subject's level of depression. The CGI depression score ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7. For the CGI depression score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome.

Other outcomes

  • Change from baseline in the MADRS total score at each assessment point [Baseline/ Week 1/ Week2/ Week3/ Week4/ Week5/ Week 6]: Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)is a clinician-rated assessment of a subject's level of depression. The MADRS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60. For the MADRS total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome. The MADRS contains ten (10) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 10 items.
  • Change from baseline in the CGI-BP-S (depression) score at each assessment point [Baseline/ Week 1/ Week2/ Week3/ Week4/ Week5/ Week 6]: Clinical Global Impression Bipolar Version, Severity of Illness (CGI-BP-S) score (depression) is a clinician-rated assessment of a subject's level of depression. The CGI depression score ranges from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7. For the CGI depression score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome.
  • Change from baseline in the SDS total score at Week 6 [Baseline/ week 6]: Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) total score is a subject-rated assessment of a subject's level of functional impairment in work/school, social life and family life/home responsibilities. The SDS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 30. For the SDS total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome. The SDS contains three (3) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 3 items.
  • Change from baseline in the YMRS total score at Week 6 and each assessment point [Baseline/ Week 1/ Week2/ Week3/ Week4/ Week5/ Week 6]: YMRS (Young Mania Rating Scale) is a clinician-rated assessment of the severity of mania in subjects with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The YMRS total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 60. For the YMRS total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome. The YMRS contains eleven (11) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 11 items.
  • Change from baseline in the HAM-A total score at Week 6 [Baseline/ week 6]: The Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) scale is a rating scale developed to quantify the severity of anxiety symptomatology. The HAM-A total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 56. For the HAM-A total score, low scores indicate a better outcome and high scores indicate a worse outcome. When change from baseline is considered, a negative (decrease in score) value is considered a better outcome, and a positive (increase in score) value is considered a worse outcome. The HAM-A contains fourteen (14) items. The total score is computed as the sum of the scores for the 14 items.
  • Incidence of Adverse events (AEs) and Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) [Screening/ Baseline/ Week 1/ Week2/ Week3/ Week4/ Week5/ Week 6/ Follow up]: Adverse events, adverse drug reactions

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients who have provided written voluntary consent in person after receiving and understanding adequate explanation about the study, including the objectives, content, expected therapeutic and pharmacological effects, and risks.
2. Outpatients who are aged 18 through 65 years at time of informed consent.
3. Patients with bipolar I disorder, most recent episode depressed, without rapid cycling disease course ( no less than 4 episodes of mood disturbance in the 12 months prior to screening), and without psychotic features (diagnosed by DSM-5 criteria).

+Locations (26)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Beijing Anding Hospital capital medical universityBeijing, Beijing MunicipalityChina
Beijing HuiLongGuan HospitalBeijing, Beijing MunicipalityChina
Peking University 6th HospitalBeijing, Beijing MunicipalityChina
Chongqing Mental Health CenterChongqing, Chongqing MunicipalityChina
Xiamen Xianyue HospitalXiamen, FujianChina
Guangzhou Huiai HospitalGuangzhou, GuangdongChina
Shenzhen Kangning HospitalShenzhen, GuangChina
Hebei Provincal Mental Health CenterBaoding, HebeiChina
The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical UniversityXinxiang, HenanChina
Zhumadian Psychiatric HospitalZhumadian, HenanChina
Wuhan Mental Health CenterWuhan, HubeiChina
Brain Hospital of Hunan ProvinceChangsha, HunanChina
Nanjing Brain HospitalNanjing, JiangsuChina
Ningbo Kangning HospitalNingbo, JiangsuChina
Wuxi Mental Health CenterWuxi, JiangsuChina
Zhenjiang mental health centerZhenjiang, JiangsuChina
Dalian Seventh People's HospitalDalian, LiaoningChina
Jining Psychiatric prevention and treatment hospitalJining, ShandongChina
Shanghai Mental Health CenterShanghai, Shanghai MunicipalityChina
Shanghai Tongji HospitalShanghai, Shanghai MunicipalityChina
Mental Health Center of Xi'an CityXi’an, ShanxiChina
The forth People's Hospital of ChengduChengdu, SichuanChina
Tianjin Anding HospitalTianjin, Tianjin MunicipalityChina
Urumqi 4th People's HospitalÜrümqi, XinjiangChina
The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical UniversityÜrümqi, XinjiangChina
The 1st Hospital of Zhejiang ProvinceHangzhou, ZhejiangChina

+Investigators

  • Gang Wang, Doctor, Principal investigator, Beijing Anding Hospital capital medical university