Spinal Manipulation and Neuromuscular Performance on Amateur Cyclists

NCT03913546 — Not applicable, Withdrawn, University of Alcala

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Acute Effects of Spinal Manipulation on the Neuromuscular Performance of Amateur Cyclists: Pilot Study

RegistryNCT03913546
StatusWithdrawn - In the first tests the force meter gave an error and all the records were lost. Then came the COVID-19 pandemic. At this time we are unable to finish the study. We hope to be able to complete it by the middle of next year.
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: triple, other
SponsorUniversity of Alcala (Other)
ConditionsManual Therapies
InterventionsSpinal manipulative therapy, Sham spinal manipulative therapy (Procedure, other)
Datesstart 2022-06-01 (estimated), primary completion 2022-07-01 (estimated), completion 2022-10-01 (estimated), first posted 2019-04-12, last updated 2024-05-13
Locations1 site in Spain

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Manual Therapies All trials of Spinal manipulative therapy All trials of Sham spinal manipulative therapy

-Summary

The present study aims to assess the effects of spinal manipulation therapy on neuromuscular performance.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The present study will follow a parallel, pre-post design. The aim will be to determine the acute effects of spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) on different neuromuscular properties of recreational cyclists. Specifically, the investigators will measure the maximum force production capacity and muscle activation of the knee extensors concomitantly during a maximal voluntary contraction, as well as the maximum and mean power attained during a Wingate cycling test (i.e., 30 seconds 'all out'). Participants will undergo the tests on two different occasions separated by at least 48 hours and a maximum of 2 weeks. The same tests will be conducted in both testing sessions, but participants will be randomly assigned into two groups (sham or actual SMT) immediately before the second testing session.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Sham spinal manipulationSham comparatorOther: Sham spinal manipulative therapyParticipants in the 'sham' group will receive a sham mechanical thrust (force set at level 0) instead of an actual one. In the force level 0, no excursion of the stylus occurs, but the instrument produces the same clicking sound as in the actual SMT condition. Therefore, the subject does not distinguish between intervention or placebo.
Actual spinal manipulationExperimentalProcedure: Spinal manipulative therapyParticipants in the actual actual spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) group will be assessed through the Activator basic method. SMT will be performed with the Activator IV Adjusting Instrument (Activator Methods International, Phoenix, AZ) varying the force level depending on the adjusted segment.
  • Spinal manipulative therapy (Procedure), also known as Chiropractic manipulation, Spine thrust manipulation: Participants in the actual spinal manipulative therapy group will be assessed through the activator basic method protocol. SMT will be performed with an Activator IV (Activator Methods International, Phoenix, AZ) setting the force at level 3 for the low thoracic spine (T7-T12), and level 4 for the lumbar spine and pelvis.
  • Sham spinal manipulative therapy (Other): Participants in the sham SMT group will undergo a protocol identical to the actual one, with the exception that a sham mechanical thrust (force set at level 0) will be delivered to the targeted areas. In the force level 0 no excursion of the stylus occurs, but the instrument produces the same clicking sound as in the actual SMT condition

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Maximal force [On the control session and on the intervention session (immediately after the sham or actual SMT procedure)]: Peak force registered during an isometric maximal voluntary contraction of the knee extensors.
  • Voluntary activation [On the control session and on the intervention session (immediately after the sham or actual SMT procedure)]: Electromyographic activity of the vastus lateralis muscle registered during an isometric maximal voluntary contraction of the knee extensors.
  • Peak power [On the control session and on the intervention session (immediately after the sham or actual SMT procedure)]: Peak power registered during a 30-second Wingate anaerobic cycling test
  • Mean power [On the control session and on the intervention session (immediately after the sham or actual SMT procedure)]: Mean power registered during a 30-second Wingate anaerobic cycling test

+Eligibility

Sex: Male, ages: 18 Years to 45 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* Will be recruited from three different local triathlon and cycling clubs.
* Will have to cycle at least 4 hours per week during the preceding 3 months, and to have a cycling experience greater than 2 years

Exclusion Criteria:

* Having suffered an injury in the month before the study that precluded regular exercise practice
* Having suffered any type of spine injury before the study
* Having previously received Spinal Manipulation Therapy

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University of AlcaláAlcalá de HenaresSpain

+Publications

  • Valenzuela PL, Pancorbo S, Lucia A, Germain F. Spinal Manipulative Therapy Effects in Autonomic Regulation and Exercise Performance in Recreational Healthy Athletes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 May 1;44(9):609-614. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002908. PMID 30325889

+Study documents

+Investigators