Orotracheal Intubation in Adult Patients: A Comparison of Standard Airtraq , Nasotracheal Airtraq Combined With a Stylet Inserted Endotracheal Tube and Standard Airtraq Combined Fiberoptic Intubation

NCT03709524 — Not applicable, Completed, 119 participants, Kocaeli University

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Comparison of Airtraq and Nasotracheal Airtraq for Orotracheal Intubation

RegistryNCT03709524
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, crossover, masking: double, diagnostic
Enrollment119 (Actual)
SponsorKocaeli University (Other)
ConditionsDifficult Intubation
InterventionsAirtraq + fiberoptic, Airtraq, Nasotracheal Airtraq + styletted tube (Device)
Datesstart 2018-10-15, primary completion 2019-02-20, completion 2019-02-20, first posted 2018-10-17, last updated 2019-06-28
Locations1 site in Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Difficult Intubation All trials of Airtraq + fiberoptic All trials of Airtraq

-Summary

Adult patients requiring endotracheal intubation divided into three groups; standard Airtraq, Nasotracheal Airtraq + styletted endotracheal tube and Airtraq + fiberoptic combination groups.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

We enroll lean adult patients requiring endotracheal intubation. Using a sealed envelope technique they divided into three groups; Standard Airtraq and Nasotracheal Airtraq + styletted endotracheal tube and Standard Airtraq + fiberoptic combination. Demographic characteristics and airway management variables such; age, gender, height, weight, ASA status, tooth morphology, tiro mental and sternomental distance were recorded. Insertion times, intubation times and total intubation times with these devices will be recorded. Hemodynamic parameters recorded such as; heart rate will be recorded baseline , after anesthesia, after insertion, just after and then every 2 minutes intervals after intubation. sore throat, hoarseness, dysphasia, bronchospasm were also recorded postoperatively.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
insertion timeActive comparatorDevice: Airtraq + fiberoptic; Device: Airtraq; Device: Nasotracheal Airtraq + styletted tube1 minute Airtraq, nasotracheal Airtraq + styletted tube and airtraq + fiberoptic
intubation timeActive comparatorDevice: Airtraq + fiberoptic; Device: Airtraq; Device: Nasotracheal Airtraq + styletted tube2 minutesAirtraq, nasotracheal Airtraq + styletted tube and airtraq + fiberoptic
  • Airtraq + fiberoptic (Device), also known as videolaryngoscope: video laryngoscope with a monitor
  • Airtraq (Device), also known as videolaryngoscope: video laryngoscope with a monitor
  • Nasotracheal Airtraq + styletted tube (Device), also known as videolaryngoscope: video laryngoscope with a monitor

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Intubation time [6 months]: entering the oral cavity till intubation

Secondary outcomes

  • insertion time [6 months]: entering the oral cavity till the optimal visualization

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* BMI<30
* > 18 AGE
* requiring endotracheal intubation
* ASA 1-2

Exclusion Criteria:

* BMI> 30
* < 18 AGE
* ASA III-IV
* upper respiratory infection past ten days
* pregnant

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Kocaeli University Medical FacultyKocaeliTurkey (Türkiye)