Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Identification of Sentinel Nodes in Esophageal Cancer

NCT03578224 — Early Phase 1, Completed, 35 participants, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT03578224
StatusCompleted
PhaseEarly Phase 1
Study typeInterventional; na, single group, masking: none, diagnostic
Enrollment35 (Actual)
SponsorSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University (Other); collaborators: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
ConditionsEsophagus
InterventionsEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA), Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Fine-Needle Aspiration, Sonazoid (Perflubutane) (Procedure, drug)
Datesstart 2018-09-06, primary completion 2022-08-25, completion 2022-08-25, first posted 2018-07-06, last updated 2025-05-18
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Esophagus All trials of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) All trials of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

-Summary

This pilot trial studies how well an ultrasound with a contrast agent (perflubutane microbubble \[Sonazoid\]) works in identifying sentinel lymph nodes in participants with esophageal cancer. Sentinel lymph nodes are lymph nodes to which the cancer is likely to spread from the primary tumor. Diagnostic procedures, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound, may work better in identifying sentinel lymph nodes and finding out how far the disease has spread.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced endoscopic lymphosonography guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of sentinel lymph nodes compared with unenhanced endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) guided FNA in the characterization of esophageal cancer-associated lymph nodes using pathology as the reference standard.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess the ability of contrast-enhanced endoscopic lymphosonography guided FNA compared with unenhanced EUS guided FNA in the overall detection of biopsy proven cancer-involved sentinel lymph nodes.

II. To assess the impact of overall tumor staging by contrast-enhanced endoscopic lymphosonography compared with unenhanced EUS.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Diagnostic (EUS, FNA, perflubutane microbubble)ExperimentalProcedure: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA); Procedure: Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound; Procedure: Fine-Needle Aspiration; Drug: Sonazoid (Perflubutane)Participants undergo standard of care unenhanced endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and fine needle aspiration (FNA) of identified lymph nodes. Participants then receive perflubutane microbubble peri- or intratumorally and undergo contrast-enhanced EUS followed by FNA of identified lymph nodes.
  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) (Procedure): Undergo EUS-FNA
  • Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (Procedure): Undergo CEUS
  • Fine-Needle Aspiration (Procedure): Undergo FNA
  • Sonazoid (Perflubutane) (Drug): Sonazoid (ultrasound contrast agent) will be injected in 0.25 mL increments at 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock positions around the tumor using a 19 - 22 gauge needle system under EUS guidance

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Accuracy rate of traditional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with suspicious node biopsy and lymphosonography for sentinel node identification [Up to 2 years]: The number and locations of the nodes identified by the two imaging approaches (contrast-enhanced ultrasound \[CEUS\] and unenhanced EUS) will be compared using McNemar's test for correlated proportions as well as using a one-sided t-test with a Wilcoxon non-parametric adjustment (normal distribution will be tested) with pathology as the reference standard for sentinel lymph node detection and considering exact binomial p-values less than 0.05 to be significant. The findings of lymphosonography will be correlated to pathological findings (including degree of metastatic involvement) to determine sensitivity and specificity and the rate of cancerous nodes identified by CEUS relative to those of unenhanced EUS using a clustered conditional logistic regression analysis of correlated proportions (equivalent to a clustered McNemar's test).

Secondary outcomes

  • Number of nodes identified [Up to 2 years]: The number and locations of the nodes identified by the two imaging approaches (CEUS and unenhanced EUS) will be compared using McNemar's test for correlated proportions as well as using a one-sided t-test with a Wilcoxon non-parametric adjustment (normal distribution will be tested) with pathology as the reference standard for sentinel lymph node detection and considering exact binomial p-values less than 0.05 to be significant. The findings of lymphosonography will be correlated to pathological findings (including degree of metastatic involvement) to determine sensitivity and specificity and the rate of cancerous nodes identified by CEUS relative to those of unenhanced EUS using a clustered conditional logistic regression analysis of correlated proportions (equivalent to a clustered McNemar's test).

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 21 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Newly diagnosed with esophageal cancer.
* Be scheduled for staging endoscopic ultrasound with the intent for lymph node evaluation.
* Provide signed and dated informed consent form.
* Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study.
* Be medically stable.
* If a female and pre-menopausal, must have a negative pregnancy test.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Females who are pregnant or nursing.
* Patients with other primary cancers requiring systemic treatment.
* Patients who are medically unstable, patients who are seriously or terminally ill, and patients whose clinical course is unpredictable.
* Patients with known hypersensitivity or allergy to any component of Sonazoid.
* Patients with cardiac shunts or unstable cardiopulmonary conditions.
* Patients with congenital heart defects.
* Patients with severe emphysema, pulmonary vasculitis, pulmonary hypertension, respiratory distress syndrome, or a history of pulmonary embolism.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphia, PennsylvaniaUnited States

+Investigators

  • Ji-Bin Liu, MD, Principal investigator, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

+Funding

NIH grants: R21CA218946