TrialReader


Influence of the Composition of Temporary Restorative Material in Vital Teeth

NCT03437655 — Not applicable, Unknown, 25 participants, Federal University of Uberlandia

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Influence of the Composition of Temporary Restorative Material on the Retention Rate and Sensitivity for Provisional Direct Restorations in Vital Teeth - Clinical Study Randomized

RegistryNCT03437655
StatusUnknown
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: double, treatment
Enrollment25 (Estimated)
SponsorFederal University of Uberlandia (Other)
ConditionsMTA, Dental Restoration, Temporary
InterventionsCarie removal, Relative isolation, Manipulation of the temporary material based on Zinc Oxide and Eugenol, Manipulation of the temporary material based on Mineral trioxide aggregate, Material insertion on the cavity, Finishing the temporary direct restoration (Procedure)
Datesstart 2018-03-20 (estimated), primary completion 2018-04-30 (estimated), completion 2018-10-30 (estimated), first posted 2018-02-19, last updated 2018-03-07
Locations1 site in Brazil

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for MTA All trials for Dental Restoration, Temporary All trials of Carie removal All trials of Relative isolation

-Summary

The aim of this study is through a randomized clinical trial, double blind, splithmouth, evaluate the success rate (retation rate and dental sensibility) of temporary direct restorations in vital teeth. The composition of the temporary direct restoration (based on Zinc-Oxide with Eugenol; and mineral trioxide aggregate). Data will be collected, tabulated and submitted to statistical analysis.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The confection of temporary direct restoration is still verry commom in dental clinic routine, either by the time required or by biological requirements.The temporary restorations must have sufficient retention and solubility between the consultation intervals to avoid displacement and infiltration; besides being biocompatible to avoid sensitivity. The aim of this study is through a randomized clinical trial, double blind, splithmouth, evaluate the success rate (retention rate and dental sensibility) of temporary direct restoration on vital teeth. The composition of the temporary material (based on Zinc-Oxide with Eugenol; and based on mineral trioxide aggregate) will be evaluated. Twenty-five participants with at least two vital teeth with the need to confection of direct restoration (each participant) will be selected. The teeth will be randomly divided into 2 different groups according to the temporary material composition (Based on Zinc-Oxide with Eugenol; and based on mineral trioxide aggregate). Data will be collected, tabulated and submitted to statistical analysis.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Zinc oxide and eugenolActive comparatorProcedure: Carie removal; Procedure: Relative isolation; Procedure: Manipulation of the temporary material based on Zinc Oxide and Eugenol; Procedure: Material insertion on the cavity; Procedure: Finishing the temporary direct restorationTemporary direct restoration with zinc oxide and eugenol.
Mineral trioxide aggregateActive comparatorProcedure: Carie removal; Procedure: Relative isolation; Procedure: Manipulation of the temporary material based on Mineral trioxide aggregate; Procedure: Material insertion on the cavity; Procedure: Finishing the temporary direct restorationTemporary direct restoration with Mineral trioxide aggregate.
  • Carie removal (Procedure): Carie removal with a low speed handpiece
  • Relative isolation (Procedure): Relative isolation with cotton and gauze.
  • Manipulation of the temporary material based on Zinc Oxide and Eugenol (Procedure): Manipulation of the temporary material based on Zinc Oxide and Eugenol according to the manufacturer's recommendations
  • Manipulation of the temporary material based on Mineral trioxide aggregate (Procedure): Manipulation of the temporary material based on Mineral trioxide aggregate according to the manufacturer's recommendations
  • Material insertion on the cavity (Procedure): Material insertion on the cavity according to the manufacturer's recommendations
  • Finishing the temporary direct restoration (Procedure): Excess cement removal; Occlusal Adjustment; Finishing and polishing.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Success rate (retention rate and absence of sensibility) of temporary direct restoration with diferents temporary materials with a 15 days of follow up [15 days]

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Healthy volunteers; both genres; presence of at least two teeth with indication of direct restoration; good oral hygiene.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Dentures or orthodontics; presence of periodontal disease and,or parafunctional habits; systemic disease and, or severe psychological; constant use of analgesic and, or anti-inflammatory or allergic response to dental products.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Federal University of UberlandiaUberlândia, Minas GeraisBrazil

+Publications

  • Al Jabbari YS, Al-Rasheed A, Smith JW, Iacopino AM. An indirect technique for assuring simplicity and marginal integrity of provisional restorations during full mouth rehabilitation. Saudi Dent J. 2013 Jan;25(1):39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Nov 10. PMID 23960554
  • Arora SJ, Arora A, Upadhyaya V, Jain S. Comparative evaluation of marginal leakage of provisional crowns cemented with different temporary luting cements: In vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):42-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.164911. PMID 27134427
  • Fonseca RB, Martins LR, Quagliatto PS, Soares CJ. Influence of provisional cements on ultimate bond strength of indirect composite restorations to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2005 Autumn;7(3):225-30. PMID 16240963
  • Hill EE, Lott J. A clinically focused discussion of luting materials. Aust Dent J. 2011 Jun;56 Suppl 1:67-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01297.x. PMID 21564117
  • Koumjian JH, Nimmo A. Evaluation of fracture resistance of resins used for provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Dec;64(6):654-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90290-s. PMID 2079670
  • Mahn E, Rousson V, Heintze S. Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Bonding Parameters on the Clinical Outcome of Tooth-colored Cervical Restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Aug;17(5):391-403. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35008. PMID 26525003
  • Qudeimat MA, Alyahya A, Hasan AA. Mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy for permanent molars with clinical signs indicative of irreversible pulpitis: a preliminary study. Int Endod J. 2017 Feb;50(2):126-134. doi: 10.1111/iej.12614. Epub 2016 Feb 22. PMID 26841969
  • von Arx T. [Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) a success story in apical surgery]. Swiss Dent J. 2016;126(6):573-95. doi: 10.61872/sdj-2016-06-02. French, German. PMID 27377433
  • Young HM, Smith CT, Morton D. Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Feb;85(2):129-32. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.112797. PMID 11208201

My Notes