Comparison of Chloroprocaine vs Lidocaine for Epidural Anesthesia in Cesarean Delivery

NCT03414359 — Early Phase 1, Completed, 70 participants, University of Arkansas

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Randomized, Double-blind Study Comparing 3% Chloroprocaine Versus 2 % Lidocaine/ Epinephrine/ Bicarbonate/ Fentanyl for Epidural Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery

RegistryNCT03414359
StatusCompleted
PhaseEarly Phase 1
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: triple, treatment
Enrollment70 (Actual)
SponsorUniversity of Arkansas (Other)
ConditionsSurgical Anesthesia, Cesarean Section
Interventions2% Lidocaine, 3% Chloroprocaine (Drug)
Datesstart 2018-02-15, primary completion 2019-03-27, completion 2019-03-27, first posted 2018-01-29, last updated 2020-04-13
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Surgical Anesthesia, Cesarean Section All trials of 2% Lidocaine All trials of 3% Chloroprocaine

-Summary

Regional anesthesia is commonly used for elective and emergency cesarean delivery. It provides numerous safety advantages when compared to general anesthesia for both the mother and fetus1. Epidurals also have the added benefit of being able to provide pain relief throughout labor and in the event of cesarean delivery, epidural analgesia can be "extended" to provide surgical anesthesia. Numerous studies have been performed to assess the onset times of various local anesthetics when administered through an epidural catheter. Attempts to reduce anesthetic onset time and improve the quality of intraoperative analgesia have been attempted by using different local anesthetic solutions and by the addition of other drugs to the epidural solution (such as epinephrine, fentanyl and sodium bicarbonate).

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Regional anesthesia is commonly used for elective and emergency cesarean delivery. It provides numerous safety advantages when compared to general anesthesia for both the mother and fetus1. Epidurals also have the added benefit of being able to provide pain relief throughout labor and in the event of cesarean delivery, epidural analgesia can be "extended" to provide surgical anesthesia. Numerous studies have been performed to assess the onset times of various local anesthetics when administered through an epidural catheter. Attempts to reduce anesthetic onset time and improve the quality of intraoperative analgesia have been attempted by using different local anesthetic solutions and by the addition of other drugs to the epidural solution (such as epinephrine, fentanyl and sodium bicarbonate).

A recent meta-analysis concluded that the optimum local anesthetic solution for extending a labor epidural from analgesia to surgical anesthesia has yet to be determined 2. In 1994, a retrospective study compared 1.5% lidocaine/bicarbonate/epinephrine mixture to 3% chloroprocaine in parturients with pre-existing epidural catheters for urgent cesarean delivery3. It was found that the chloroprocaine group had a significantly faster onset of anesthesia compared to the lidocaine group. Both drugs provided excellent anesthesia. However a high quality study comparing 3% chloroprocaine with 2% lidocaine/ epinephrine/ bicarbonate/ fentanyl (LEBF) in terms of anesthetic onset times has yet to be performed.

Women in labor frequently request an epidural to provide pain relief. Epidural pain relief is commonly provided by the administration of a low concentration of local anesthetic and opioid solution through an epidural catheter. This solution is delivered by an automated epidural infusion pump. In the event that a cesarean delivery is required, the pre-existing epidural is frequently used to administer a higher concentration anesthetic solution to allow pain free cesarean delivery. This is commonly referred to as an "epidural top up" or as an "extension of the epidural block." Standard practice at University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) for an epidural top up is Lidocaine, Epinephrine, Bicarbonate and Fentanyl (LEBF) or 3% chloroprocaine. These two mixtures are routinely and almost exclusively used for epidural cesarean delivery. The decision on which mixture to use is based solely on physician preference. It is likely that the LBEF mixture is used more frequently but the investigators consider both local anesthetic mixtures as equals and the standard of care at UAMS. The investigators do not use any other local anesthetics (unless there are very specific reasons).

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
2% LidocaineActive comparatorDrug: 2% LidocaineGroup LEBF received 20 ml of 2% lidocaine (combined with the following adjuncts \[0.15 ml of 0.1% epinephrine, 2 ml of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate and 2 ml of 100 mcg fentanyl
3% ChloroprocaineExperimentalDrug: 3% Chloroprocaine20 ml of 3% chloroprocaine with 4 ml 0.9% sodium chloride
  • 2% Lidocaine (Drug), also known as Xylocaine: 2% Lidocaine using a combined spinal-epidural (CSE)
  • 3% Chloroprocaine (Drug), also known as Nesacaine: 3% Chloroprocaine using a combined spinal-epidural (CSE)

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • The Onset Time to Surgical Anesthesia [Up to 35 minutes]: The onset time to surgical anesthesia, as reported by the participant using a standard procedure This will be measured by the time taken from the end of the epidural loading dose to develop a loss of touch sensation using a neurotip® (Owen Mumford, USA) device bilaterally at the T7 dermatomal level using a non-inferiority study design. A non-inferiority limit of 3 minutes was chosen apriori.

Secondary outcomes

  • Secondary Outcome: Number of Participants With Requirement for Intraoperative Analgesia Supplementation [1 hour]: This requirement for any rescue medications to control discomfort or pain during CD

+Eligibility

Sex: Female, ages: 18 Years to 99 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* ≥ 18 years of age for the mother
* Singleton pregnancy
* Gestation > 36 weeks
* American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class II
* Provides written consent
* Infant of mother

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patient refusal
* Non-elective or urgent/emergent cesarean sections
* ASA class III or above
* Unable to understand English
* Significant back surgery or scoliosis
* Known fetal abnormality
* Weight > 120 kg
* Height < 150 cm
* Allergy to local anesthetics
* Concurrent use of sulfonamides

+Posted results

Participant flow

Milestone2% Lidocaine3% Chloroprocaine
Started3535
Completed3433
Not completed12

Outcome results

  • The Onset Time to Surgical Anesthesia (Primary), Mean, seconds: 2% Lidocaine 558 +/- 269; 3% Chloroprocaine 655 +/- 258 (p 0.10)
  • Secondary Outcome: Number of Participants With Requirement for Intraoperative Analgesia Supplementation (Secondary), Count of participants, Participants: 2% Lidocaine 4; 3% Chloroprocaine 7

Adverse events

Time frame: During inpatient admission, approximately three days

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
2% Lidocaine0/34 (0.0%)0/34 (0.0%)0/34 (0.0%)
3% Chloroprocaine0/33 (0.0%)0/33 (0.0%)1/33 (3.0%)

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan system2% Lidocaine3% Chloroprocaine
Post dural puncture headacheNervous system disorders0/341/33

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University of Arkansas for Medical SciencesLittle Rock, ArkansasUnited States

+Publications

  • Results publication: Sharawi N, Bansal P, Williams M, Spencer H, Mhyre JM. Comparison of Chloroprocaine Versus Lidocaine With Epinephrine, Sodium Bicarbonate, and Fentanyl for Epidural Extension Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Noninferiority Study. Anesth Analg. 2021 Mar 1;132(3):666-675. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005141. PMID 32852294

+Study documents

+Investigators