TrialReader


Optimisation of Hearing Aid Fitting

NCT03279367 — Completed, 20 participants, University of Southampton

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Objective Response Detection to Natural Speech Stimuli for Optimisation of Hearing Aid Fitting Evaluation

RegistryNCT03279367
StatusCompleted
Study typeObservational
Enrollment20 (Actual)
SponsorUniversity of Southampton (Other); collaborators: Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Imperial College London, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK
ConditionsHearing Loss, Hearing Abnormality
InterventionsObjective speech response detection (Diagnostic test)
Datesstart 2017-12-22, primary completion 2018-09-01, completion 2018-09-30, first posted 2017-09-12, last updated 2021-07-30
Locations1 site in United Kingdom

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Hearing Loss All trials for Hearing Abnormality All trials of Objective speech response detection

-Summary

This study aims to explore if objective brain responses to speech stimuli (words and running speech) can be used to evaluate hearing aid fitting in adults. Objective brain responses would be beneficial, as they could be used to evaluate hearing with people who are incapable or unwilling to provide subjective responses. The study aims to determine if EEG responses to speech sounds are sensitive to the effects of hearing aids for hearing aid users. Secondary, the study will look into the need for using speech stimuli in order to obtain more robust responses compared to current clinical standards.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The research questions addressed are as follows

1. Are speech-evoked objective brain responses sensitive to hearing aid amplification?
2. Are speech-evoked brain responses sensitive to distortions in speech and can hearing aid amplification resolve issues with brain responses to distorted speech?
3. Which tests are optimal for detection of objective brain responses to speech?
4. Are realistic speech stimuli (words or running speech) able to robustly detect brain responses compared to current clinical standards (clicks and tones)? The study will be carried out on a group of mildly to moderately hearing impaired subjects between the age of 18 and 70. Subjects will be recruited from the Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, where the research will be conducted. Participants will have their hearing function and hearing aid fitting checked as described in the design and methodology section of this proposal. During the experiment, participants will be asked to listen to speech sounds presented from a loudspeaker at comfortable listening levels. The responses will be measured with the participant wearing and not wearing hearing aids. Additionally, participants will perform a behavioural task for perception of speech. Participants will be asked to attend 2 sessions of 2 hours. Data collection will run over 1 year.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Hearing ImpairedDiagnostic Test: Objective speech response detectionParticipants will be asked to wear an electro-encephalography (EEG) cap for measurement of brain activity whilst listening to speech stimuli. The speech stimuli will be presented through a loudspeaker positioned 1 meter in front of the participant. Participants will be asked to listen to the speech stimuli when using and without using their hearing aid. They will be asked to pay attention to the speech stimuli. This will be assured by asking them to answer questions related to the speech stimulus at random intervals. Subjects will also go through standard clinical procedures for assessing their hearing function and hearing aid setup.
  • Objective speech response detection (Diagnostic test): Changes in brain activity when a speech stimulus is presented will be measured using electro-encephalography (EEG)

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Objective response detection [Immediate]: Detection success rate and time for obtaining a brain response to the sound stimuli.

Secondary outcomes

  • Improved statistical test [Immediate]: Hotelling's T2 test to objectively determine the presence of a response compared to background noise.
  • Stimulus reconstruction [Immediate]: Correlation test to determine the accuracy of the estimated speech stimulus using the decoder compared to the presented speech stimulus for running speech. Detection of auditory brainstem and auditory steady state potential characteristic peaks and troughs for responses to click and tone stimuli, respectively.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Subjects are between 18 and 70 years old
* Native English speakers
* Have mild to moderate hearing loss in their better ear measured using current clinical standards
* Routine hearing aid users

Exclusion Criteria:

* Clinical observation indicates the presence of ear infections or an occluded ear canal on the day of testing
* Subjects with recent ear surgery (within a month before the day of testing)
* Subjects who are taking substances that could affect brain responses (e.g. medication for the treatment of depression)

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation TrustReading, BerkshireUnited Kingdom

+Publications

  • Results publication: Vanheusden FJ, Kegler M, Ireland K, Georga C, Simpson DM, Reichenbach T, Bell SL. Hearing Aids Do Not Alter Cortical Entrainment to Speech at Audible Levels in Mild-to-Moderately Hearing-Impaired Subjects. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Apr 3;14:109. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00109. eCollection 2020. PMID 32317951
  • Results publication: Vanheusden FJ, Chesnaye MA, Simpson DM, Bell SL. Envelope frequency following responses are stronger for high-pass than low-pass filtered vowels. Int J Audiol. 2019 Jun;58(6):355-362. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1562243. Epub 2019 Jan 24. PMID 30675827
  • Results publication: Vanheusden FJ, Bell SL, Chesnaye MA, Simpson DM. Improved Detection of Vowel Envelope Frequency Following Responses Using Hotelling's T2 Analysis. Ear Hear. 2019 Jan/Feb;40(1):116-127. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000598. PMID 29757799

+Study documents

+Investigators

My Notes