TrialReader


A Comparison of Videolaryngoscope and Direct Laryngoscope in IOP Changes, Throat Pain, IT and Hemodynamic Variables

NCT03279172 — Not applicable, Completed, 78 participants, Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Comparison of Videolaryngoscope and Direct Laryngoscope in Intraocular Pressure Changes, Throat Pain, Intubation Time and Hemodynamic Variables

RegistryNCT03279172, acronym IOP
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, crossover, masking: single, diagnostic
Enrollment78 (Actual)
SponsorDiskapi Teaching and Research Hospital (Other)
ConditionsIntraocular Pressure, Intubation;Difficult
Interventionsdirect laryngoscope, videolaryngoscope (Procedure)
Datesstart 2017-01-01, primary completion 2017-08-03, completion 2017-08-04, first posted 2017-09-12, last updated 2017-09-13
Locations1 site in Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Intraocular Pressure All trials for Intubation;Difficult All trials of direct laryngoscope All trials of videolaryngoscope

-Summary

The aim of the study was to compare intraocular pressure, intubation time, throat pain and hemodynamic variables using direct or videolaryngoscopy under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

INTRODUCTION Videolaryngoscopes are the new generation devices which were introduced into the difficult intubation algorithm by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) in 2013 (1). Videolaryngoscopes are known to be superior to traditional direct laryngoscopy in cases of difficult airway, glottic visualisation is obtained more easily and less airway trauma is seen (2). Portable videolaryngoscope which is used in difficult airways (3). There are 2, 3, and 4 numbered blades. In the light source of the blade of the videolaryngoscope, there is a camera which is connected to a video screen monitor. In addition to passing soft tissues by visualisation, the camera is helpful in defining the glottic appearance (1).

There are studies which have compared the hemodynamic response and increase in IOP in intubation using direct laryngoscope and various videolaryngoscopes and airway devices . However, to the best of our knowledge there is no study comparing the effect on the increase in IOP of videolaryngoscope and direct laryngoscope. The aim of the current study was to compare IOP, hemodynamic parameters and throat pain in the use of videolaryngoscope and the direct laryngoscope.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Group Direct LaryngoscopeExperimentalProcedure: direct laryngoscope; Procedure: videolaryngoscopedirect laryngoscope (macintosh laryngoscope) is used in elective surgeries with maximal duration time for two hours. Standard anaesthesia was used on group and BIS monitorisation was applied. A record was made of IOP, hemodynamic changes and oxygen saturation at 3 and 10 minutes after intubation. Throat pain was evaluated by questioning the patient at 10 minutes and 24 hours after waking from general anaesthesia. The duration of intubation was recorded as the time from the laryngoscope entering the mouth to removal with end-tidal carbon dioxide on the monitor. Macintosh laryingoscope, BIS monitoring and tonometry would be used in Group Direct Laryngoscope.
Group videolaryngoscopeExperimentalProcedure: direct laryngoscope; Procedure: videolaryngoscopeVideolaryngoscope is used in elective surgeries with maximal duration time for two hours. Standard anaesthesia was used on group and BIS monitorisation was applied. A record was made of IOP, hemodynamic changes and oxygen saturation at 3 and 10 minutes after intubation. Throat pain was evaluated by questioning the patient at 10 minutes and 24 hours after waking from general anaesthesia. The duration of intubation was recorded as the time from the laryngoscope entering the mouth to removal with end-tidal carbon dioxide on the monitor. Video laryingoscope, BIS monitoring and tonometry would be used in Group Video Laryngoscope.
  • direct laryngoscope (Procedure): procedure entubatıon
  • videolaryngoscope (Procedure)

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • High intraorbital pressure [1 minute]: IOP 18-22 mmHg

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 65 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* Elective Surgery under general anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

* History of Glaucoma
* History of hearth disease
* History of Alzheimer

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University of Health Dıskapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and HospitalAnkara, AltındagTurkey (Türkiye)

+Publications

  • Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope(R) video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;59(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9620-5. Epub 2011 Nov 1. PMID 22042705
  • Results publication: Vinayagam S, Dhanger S, Tilak P, Gnanasekar R. C-MAC(R) video laryngoscope with D-BLADE and Frova introducer for awake intubation in a patient with parapharyngeal mass. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Oct-Dec;10(4):471-473. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.179118. PMID 27833500

+Investigators

  • Ceyda Ozhan Caparlar, Study director, University of Health Dıskapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Hospital

My Notes