SPIRIT 1: An International Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study to Evaluate Relugolix Administered With and Without Low-Dose Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate in Women With Endometriosis-Associated Pain
| Registry | NCT03204318 |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | Phase 3 |
| Study type | Interventional; randomized, parallel, masking: triple, treatment |
| Enrollment | 638 (Actual) |
| Sponsor | Myovant Sciences GmbH (Industry) |
| Conditions | Endometriosis Related Pain |
| Interventions | Relugolix, Estradiol/norethindrone acetate, Estradiol/norethindrone acetate placebo, Relugolix placebo (Drug) |
| Dates | start 2017-12-07, primary completion 2020-06-09, completion 2021-04-08, first posted 2017-07-02, last updated 2021-06-28 |
| Locations | 123 sites in United States, Argentina, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Finland, Hungary and 5 more countries |
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Endometriosis Related Pain All trials of Relugolix All trials of Estradiol/norethindrone acetate
-Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the benefit and safety of relugolix 40 milligrams (mg) once daily, co-administered with low-dose estradiol (E2) and norethindrone acetate (NETA) compared with placebo for 24 weeks, on dysmenorrhea and on nonmenstrual pelvic pain.
Expand all sections · Collapse all
+Detailed description
This study is an international phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study to evaluate 24 weeks of oral, once-daily relugolix (40 mg) co-administered with either 12 or 24 weeks of low-dose E2 (1.0 mg) and NETA (0.5 mg), compared with placebo.
Approximately 600 women with endometriosis-associated pain will be enrolled and randomized 1:1:1 to Group A - relugolix plus low-dose hormonal add-back therapy, Group B - relugolix monotherapy for 12 weeks followed by co-administration with low-dose hormonal add-back therapy, or Group C - placebo (N = 200 per group).
Eligible participants were randomized on Baseline Day 1 to Treatment Group A, B, or C, in the double-blind period.
Eligible participants, including those randomized to placebo, were offered the opportunity to enroll in an 80-week open-label extension study where participants received relugolix co-administered with low-dose E2 and NETA. Participants who did not enroll into the extension study had a Follow-Up visit approximately 30 days after the participant's last dose of study drug.
+Arms and interventions
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|
| Relugolix plus E2/NETA (Group A) | Experimental | Drug: Relugolix; Drug: Estradiol/norethindrone acetate | Relugolix co-administered with E2/NETA for 24 weeks. |
| Relugolix plus Delayed E2/NETA (Group B) | Experimental | Drug: Relugolix; Drug: Estradiol/norethindrone acetate; Drug: Estradiol/norethindrone acetate placebo | Relugolix co-administered with E2/NETA placebo for 12 weeks, followed by relugolix co-administered with E2/NETA for 12 weeks. |
| Placebo (Group C) | Placebo comparator | Drug: Estradiol/norethindrone acetate placebo; Drug: Relugolix placebo | Relugolix placebo co-administered with E2/NETA placebo for 24 weeks. |
- Relugolix (Drug), also known as TAK-385, MVT-601: Relugolix 40-mg tablet administered orally once daily.
- Estradiol/norethindrone acetate (Drug), also known as E2/NETA: Capsule containing co-formulated tablet of E2 (1.0 mg)/NETA (0.5 mg) administered orally once daily.
- Estradiol/norethindrone acetate placebo (Drug): E2 (0 mg)/NETA (0 mg) placebo capsule administered orally once daily and designed to match the E2/NETA capsule in size, shape, color, and odor.
- Relugolix placebo (Drug): Relugolix (0 mg) placebo tablet administered orally once daily and manufactured to match the relugolix tablet in size, shape, color, and odor.
+Outcome measures
Primary outcomes
- Percentage Of Participants Who Meet The Dysmenorrhea Responder Criteria At Week 24 Or End Of Treatment (EOT) [Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an electronic diary (e-Diary). The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
- Percentage Of Participants Who Meet The Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP) Responder Criteria At Week 24 Or EOT [Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary. The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
Secondary outcomes
- Change From Baseline In The Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP)-30 Pain Score At Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]: Assessed using the Pain Domain of the EHP-30 questionnaire.
- Change From Baseline In Dysmenorrhea NRS Score At Week 24 Or EOT [Baseline, Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change From Baseline In NMPP NRS Score At Week 24 Or EOT [Baseline, Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change From Baseline In Overall Pelvic Pain NRS Score At Week 24 Or EOT [Baseline, Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Percentage Of Participants Who Are Not Using Opioids For Endometriosis-associated Pain At Week 24 Or EOT [Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed based on usage of protocol-specified opioids for endometriosis-associated pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change From Baseline In Dyspareunia NRS Scores At Week 24 Or EOT [Baseline, Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for dyspareunia recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change From Baseline In Analgesic Use For Endometriosis-associated Pain Based On Mean Pill Count At Week 24 Or EOT [Baseline, Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed based on usage of protocol-specified analgesic for endometriosis-associated pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Percentage Of Participants Who Have A Reduction Of At Least 20 Points In The EHP-30 Pain Domain From Baseline To Week 24 [Baseline to Week 24]: Assessed using the pain domain of the EHP-30 questionnaire.
- Dysmenorrhea Responder Rate By Month [Baseline to Week 24]: The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
- NMPP Responder Rate By Month [Baseline to Week 24]: The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
- Change In Dysmenorrhea NRS Score By Month [Baseline to Week 24]: Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change In NMPP NRS Score By Month [Baseline to Week 24]: Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change In Overall Pelvic Pain NRS Score By Month [Baseline to Week 24]: Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change In Dyspareunia NRS Score By Month [Baseline to Week 24]: Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change From Baseline In Ibuprofen Use At Week 24 Or EOT [Baseline, Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using ibuprofen pill counts for endometriosis-associated pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change From Baseline In Opioid Use At Week 24 Or EOT [Baseline, Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using opioid pill counts for endometriosis-associated pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change From Baseline In The Mean Dysmenorrhea Functional Impairment At Week 24 Or EOT [Baseline, Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using the subject modified Biberoglu and Behrman 5-point scale for dysmenorrhea recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change From Baseline In The Mean NMPP Functional Impairment At Week 24 Or EOT [Baseline, Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using the subject modified Biberoglu and Behrman 4-point scale for pelvic pain recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change From Baseline In The Mean Dyspareunia Functional Impairment At Week 24 Or EOT [Baseline, Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using the subject modified Biberoglu and Behrman 5-point scale for dyspareunia recorded daily in an e-Diary.
- Change From Baseline In Patient Global Assessment (PGA) For Dysmenorrhea Symptom Severity At Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]: The PGA for dysmenorrhea is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of the severity of pain during their menstrual cycle.
- Percentage Of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Or Worsening From Baseline In PGA For Dysmenorrhea At Week 24 [Week 24]: The PGA for dysmenorrhea is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of the severity of pain during their menstrual cycle.
- Change From Baseline In PGA For NMPP Symptom Severity At Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]: The PGA for NMPP is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of the severity of pain when they are not menstruating.
- Percentage Of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Or Worsening From Baseline In PGA For NMPP At Week 24 [Week 24]: The PGA for NMPP is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of the severity of pain when they are not menstruating.
- Change From Baseline In PGA For Pain Severity At Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]: The PGA for pain severity is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of how their pain affected their usual activities.
- Percentage Of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Or Worsening From Baseline In PGA For Pain Severity At Week 24 [Week 24]: The PGA for pain severity is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of how their pain affected their usual activities.
- Change From Baseline In PGA For Function At Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]: The PGA for function is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of how their pain affected their usual activities.
- Percentage Of Participants With Improvement, No Change, Or Worsening From Baseline In PGA For Function At Week 24 [Week 24]: The PGA for function is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of how their pain affected their usual activities.
- Percentage Of Participants Who Are "Better" Or "Much Better" On The Patient Global Impression Of Change (PGIC) For Dysmenorrhea At Week 24 [Week 24]: The PGIC for dysmenorrhea is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of change in the severity of pain during their menstrual cycle.
- Percentage Of Participants Who Are "Better" Or "Much Better" On The PGIC For NMPP At Week 24 [Week 24]: The PGIC for NMPP is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of change in the severity of pain during their menstrual cycle.
- Percentage Of Participants Who Are "Better" Or "Much Better" On The PGIC For Dyspareunia At Week 24 [Week 24]: The PGIC for dyspareunia is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participants' impression of change in the severity of pain during sexual intercourse.
- Change From Baseline In The Non-Pain Of The EHP-30 Domains At Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]: Assessed using the non-pain domains (Control and Powerlessness, Social Support, Emotional Well-Being, and Self-Image) of the EHP-30 questionnaire.
- Change From Baseline In The EHP-30 Scale Total Score At Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]: Assessed using the total score of the EHP-30 questionnaire.
- Change From Baseline In The EHP Work Domain Score At Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]: The EHP Work domain is a 5-item questionnaire that assesses impact of pain on ability to work.
- Categorical Change From Baseline In Quality Of Life Assessed By European Quality Of Life Five Dimension Five Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire At Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]: The EQ-5D-5L is a 5-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life.
- Change From Baseline To Week 24 In EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale Score At Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]: The EQ-5D-5L is a 5-item questionnaire designed to assess quality of life.
- Percentage Of Participants Who Meet The Dysmenorrhea Responder Criteria At Week 24 Or EOT For Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA [Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary. The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
- Percentage Of Participants Who Meet The NMPP Responder Criteria At Week 24 Or EOT For Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA [Week 24 or EOT]: Assessed using an NRS score (11-point scale) for pain recorded daily in an e-Diary. The criteria for a responder was based on a pre-defined threshold and accounted for analgesic use.
- Change From Baseline In The EHP-30 Pain Score At Week 24 For Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA [Baseline, Week 24]: Assessed using the Pain Domain of the EHP-30 questionnaire.
- Percentage Of Participants Who Have A Reduction Of At Least 20 Points In The EHP-30 Pain Domain From Baseline To Week 24 For Relugolix Plus Delayed E2/NETA [Baseline to Week 24]: Assessed using the pain domain of the EHP-30 questionnaire.
- Percentage Change From Baseline In Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine (L1-L4) At Week 12 [Baseline, Week 12]: Assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan.
- Percentage Change From Baseline In Bone Mineral Density At Lumbar Spine (L1-L4), Femoral Neck, And Total Hip At Week 24 [Baseline, Week 24]: Assessed by DXA scan.
- Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms At Week 12 Between Group A And B [Week 12]
- Change From Baseline In Serum Concentrations Of Luteinizing Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Estradiol, And Progesterone [Baseline, Week 24]: Blood samples will be collected from participants for hormonal measurements.
- Pre-dose Relugolix Plasma Concentrations [Week 4]: Blood samples will be collected from participants for relugolix measurements.
- Endometrial Biopsy At Week 24 [Week 24]: Primary diagnosis of endometrial biopsy assessment by pathologist.
+Eligibility
Sex: Female, ages: 18 Years to 50 Years
Key Inclusion Criteria:
1. Is a premenopausal female aged 18 to 50 years old (inclusive) on the day of signing of the informed consent form.
2. Has agreed to use only study-specified analgesic medications during the study and is not known to be intolerant to these.
3. Has a diagnosis of endometriosis and has had, within 10 years prior to signing the informed consent form, surgical or direct visualization and/or histopathologic confirmation of endometriosis, for example, during a laparoscopy or laparotomy.
4. During the Run-In Period (35 to 70 days prior to treatment period) has a dysmenorrhea NRS score ≥ 4.0 on at least 2 days and
1. Mean NMPP NRS score ≥ 2.5, or
2. Mean NMPP NRS score ≥ 1.25 and NMPP NRS score ≥ 5.0 on ≥ 4 days.
Key Exclusion Criteria:
1. Has a history of chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis.
2. Has any chronic pain or frequently recurring pain condition, other than endometriosis that is treated with opioids or requires analgesics for ≥ 7 days per month.
3. Has had surgical procedures for treatment of endometriosis within the 3 months prior to the Screening visit.
4. Has a history of or currently has osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease.
5. Has a clinically significant gynecologic condition, other than endometriosis, identified during Screening or Run-In period transvaginal ultrasound or endometrial biopsy.
+Locations (123)
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|
| Dothan | Dothan, Alabama | United States | |
| Mesa | Mesa, Arizona | United States | |
| Scottsdale | Scottsdale, Arizona | United States | |
| Tucson | Tucson, Arizona | United States | |
| Tucson | Tucson, Arizona | United States | |
| Canoga Park | Canoga Park, California | United States | |
| Long Beach | Long Beach, California | United States | |
| San Diego | San Diego, California | United States | |
| Greenwood Village | Greenwood Village, Colorado | United States | |
| Fort Myers | Fort Myers, Florida | United States | |
| Loxahatchee | Loxahatchee Groves, Florida | United States | |
| Miami | Miami, Florida | United States | |
| Miami | Miami, Florida | United States | |
| Orlando | Orlando, Florida | United States | |
| Oviedo | Oviedo, Florida | United States | |
| Plantation | Plantation, Florida | United States | |
| Sarasota | Sarasota, Florida | United States | |
| Atlanta | Atlanta, Georgia | United States | |
| Augusta | Augusta, Georgia | United States | |
| Norcross | Norcross, Georgia | United States | |
| Idaho Falls | Idaho Falls, Idaho | United States | |
| Oakbrook | Oak Brook, Illinois | United States | |
| Shawnee | Shawnee Mission, Kansas | United States | |
| New Orleans | New Orleans, Louisiana | United States | |
| Jefferson City | Jefferson City, Missouri | United States | |
| Las Vegas | Las Vegas, Nevada | United States | |
| Port Jefferson | Port Jefferson, New York | United States | |
| Durham | Durham, North Carolina | United States | |
| Raleigh | Raleigh, North Carolina | United States | |
| Winston Salem | Winston-Salem, North Carolina | United States | |
| Englewood | Englewood, Ohio | United States | |
| Hershey | Hershey, Pennsylvania | United States | |
| Philadelphia | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | United States | |
| Memphis | Memphis, Tennessee | United States | |
| Murfreesboro | Murfreesboro, Tennessee | United States | |
| Austin | Austin, Texas | United States | |
| Houston | Houston, Texas | United States | |
| Webster | Webster, Texas | United States | |
| Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City, Utah | United States | |
| Salt Lake City | Salt Lake City, Utah | United States | |
| Norfolk | Norfolk, Virginia | United States | |
| Richmond | Richmond, Virginia | United States | |
| Seattle | Seattle, Washington | United States | |
| Ciudad de Buenos Aires | Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires | Argentina | |
| San Isidro | San Isidro, Buenos Aires | Argentina | |
| Rosario | Rosario, Santa Fe Province | Argentina | |
| Córdoba | Córdoba | Argentina | |
| Leuven | Leuven, Flemish Brabant | Belgium | |
| La Louvière | La Louvière, Hainaut | Belgium | |
| Gent | Ghent, Oost-vlaanderen | Belgium | |
| Brussels | Brussels | Belgium | |
| Sofia | Sofia, Sofia | Bulgaria | |
| Sofia | Sofia, Sofia | Bulgaria | |
| Sofia | Sofia, Sofia | Bulgaria | |
| Blagoevgrad | Blagoevgrad | Bulgaria | |
| Pleven | Pleven | Bulgaria | |
| Sofia | Sofia | Bulgaria | |
| Sofia | Sofia | Bulgaria | |
| Stara Zagora | Stara Zagora | Bulgaria | |
| Varna | Varna | Bulgaria | |
| Red Deer | Red Deer, Alberta | Canada | |
| Waterloo | Waterloo, Ontario | Canada | |
| Victoriaville | Victoriaville, Quebec | Canada | |
| Praha 10 | Prague, Prague | Czechia | |
| Nachod | Náchod | Czechia | |
| Olomouc | Olomouc | Czechia | |
| Praha 8 - Libeň | Praha 8 - Libeň | Czechia | |
| Vodnany | Vodňany | Czechia | |
| Vysoké Mýto | Vysoké Mýto | Czechia | |
| Kuopio | Kuopio, Eastern Finland | Finland | |
| Helsinki | Helsinki, Southern Finland | Finland | |
| Oulu | Oulu | Finland | |
| Pécs | Pécs, Baranya | Hungary | |
| Békéscsaba | Békéscsaba, Bekes County | Hungary | |
| Gyula | Gyula, Bekes County | Hungary | |
| Kecskemét | Kecskemét, Bács-Kiskun county | Hungary | |
| Szeged | Szeged, Csongrád megye | Hungary | |
| Debrecen | Debrecen, Hajdú-Bihar | Hungary | |
| Debrecen | Debrecen, Hajdú-Bihar | Hungary | |
| Debrecen | Debrecen, Hajdú-Bihar | Hungary | |
| Nyíregyháza | Nyíregyháza, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg | Hungary | |
| Budapest | Budapest | Hungary | |
| Budapest | Budapest | Hungary | |
| Budapest | Budapest | Hungary | |
| Poznań | Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Skórzewo | Skórzewo, Greater Poland Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Kraków | Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Lublin | Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Lublin | Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Lublin | Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Warszawa | Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Warszawa | Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Białystok | Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Katowice | Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Katowice | Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Szczecin | Szczecin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Lódz | Lódz, Łódź Voivodeship | Poland | |
| Almada | Almada, Lisbon District | Portugal | |
| Coimbra | Coimbra | Portugal | |
| Covilhã | Covilha | Portugal | |
23 more sites not listed.
+Publications
- Results publication: Giudice LC, As-Sanie S, Arjona Ferreira JC, Becker CM, Abrao MS, Lessey BA, Dynowski K, Wilk K, Li Y, Mathur V, Wagman RB, Johnson NP. A Plain Language Summary to learn about relugolix combination therapy for the treatment of pain associated with endometriosis. Pain Manag. 2023 Nov;13(11):631-640. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2023-0052. Epub 2023 Nov 20. PMID 37982388
- Results publication: Hunsche E, Gauthier M, Witherspoon B, Rakov V, Agarwal SK. Endometriosis Symptoms and Their Impacts on the Daily Lives of US Women: Results from an Interview Study. Int J Womens Health. 2023 Jun 1;15:893-904. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S409733. eCollection 2023. PMID 37283994
- Results publication: Giudice LC, As-Sanie S, Arjona Ferreira JC, Becker CM, Abrao MS, Lessey BA, Brown E, Dynowski K, Wilk K, Li Y, Mathur V, Warsi QA, Wagman RB, Johnson NP. Once daily oral relugolix combination therapy versus placebo in patients with endometriosis-associated pain: two replicate phase 3, randomised, double-blind, studies (SPIRIT 1 and 2). Lancet. 2022 Jun 18;399(10343):2267-2279. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00622-5. PMID 35717987
- Results publication: Rolla E. Endometriosis: advances and controversies in classification, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. F1000Res. 2019 Apr 23;8:F1000 Faculty Rev-529. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14817.1. eCollection 2019. PMID 31069056
+Investigators
- Myovant Medical Monitor, Study director, Myovant Sciences
+Funding