Validation of a Mobile Phone Based on EPRO Tool in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

NCT03142711 — Completed, 80 participants, Lupus Research Alliance

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT03142711, acronym VALUE
StatusCompleted
Study typeObservational
Enrollment80 (Actual)
SponsorLupus Research Alliance (Other); collaborators: Pfizer, Ampel BioSolutions, LLC
ConditionsSLE, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
InterventionsNo Medical Intervention (Other)
Datesstart 2017-08-21, primary completion 2018-07-03, completion 2018-07-03, first posted 2017-05-05, last updated 2023-11-07
Locations10 sites in United States, Canada

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for SLE All trials for Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic All trials of No Medical Intervention

-Summary

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may involve a variety of organ systems expressed differently from patient to patient, and so can be difficult to characterize clinically. Patient reported outcomes (PROs), which consist of feedback directly from patients regarding their symptoms without interpretation by a clinician, are typically used in SLE to supplement other clinical measures. Standard PROs typically used in SLE include the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy - fatigue (FACIT-F), and the patient global assessment (PtGA), administered by paper or electronic tablet during the clinic visits. The recent development of electronic mobile device technology, such as the smartphone, has made it possible to collect PRO information away from the clinical site in the subject's environment. This study will assess by measurement equivalence testing whether data collected via a smartphone are comparable to that collected in standard fashion and whether PROs obtained in the subject's environment may be more informative than that collected in the physician's office on paper.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

  • No Medical Intervention (Other): Validation of phone ePRO

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • ePRO Validation [7 months]: To evaluate measurement equivalence between the two PRO data collection modes - original paper mode versus the ePRO application on a handheld mobile phone for the following PRO's: SF-36 HRQoL questionnaire, the FACIT-F fatigue instrument, and the PtGA. The three PROs will be administered on clinic days by both modes: paper and ePRO. Concurrent results will be compared, and percentage similarities calculated.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Willing and able to provide written informed consent
2. Males or females, aged 18 years or older
3. Classification of SLE by either the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Classification (SLICC) criteria
4. On a stable SLE treatment regimen consisting of any of the following medications for a period of at least 30 days prior to Screening

   * Corticosteroids (<30 mg prednisone or equivalent per day)
   * Hydroxychloroquine or equivalent anti-malarial
   * Other immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agents including methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, mycophenolate (including mycophenolate mofetil or sodium), cyclophosphasmide, belimumab, calcineurin inhibitors (e.g. tacrolimus, cyclosporine)
5. Willing to perform and comply with all study procedures, including attending clinic visits at Baseline, Month 1, and Month 2 as scheduled

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Rapidly progressive neurologic disease
2. Cognitive dysfunction that might interfere with the capacity to use the ePRO device
3. Any condition that might in the investigator's opinion might preclude completion of the study
4. Current drug or alcohol abuse or dependence, or a history of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence within 1 year prior to Screening
5. Clinical evidence of significant unstable or uncontrolled acute or chronic diseases not caused by SLE (e.g., diabetes, cardiovascular, pulmonary, hematologic, gastrointestinal, neurological, or infectious) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could confound the results of the study or put the subject at undue risk.

+Locations (10)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Emory UniversityAtlanta, GeorgiaUnited States
Brigham and Women's HospitLBoston, MassachusettsUnited States
Northwell HealthGreat Neck, New YorkUnited States
Allegheny Health NetworkPittsburgh, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, TennesseeUnited States
University of AlbertaEdmonton, AlbertaCanada
University of ManitobaWinnipeg, ManitobaCanada
McMaster University Medical CentreHamilton, OntarioCanada
University of Western Ontario/St. Joseph's HealthcareLondon, OntarioCanada
McGill University Health CentreMontreal, QuebecCanada