A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of OBE2109 in Subjects With Endometriosis

NCT02778399 — Phase 2, Completed, 328 participants, ObsEva SA

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2b Dose-ranging Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of OBE2109 in Subjects With Endometriosis Associated Pain

RegistryNCT02778399, acronym EDELWEISS
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 2
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: quadruple, treatment
Enrollment328 (Actual)
SponsorObsEva SA (Industry)
ConditionsEndometriosis
InterventionsPlacebo, OBE2109 (Drug)
Datesstart 2016-07-01, primary completion 2018-04-01, completion 2019-07-01, first posted 2016-05-19, last updated 2022-07-21
Locations86 sites in United States, Poland, Russia, Ukraine

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Endometriosis All trials of Placebo All trials of OBE2109

-Summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of a range of oral doses of OBE2109 versus placebo, in reducing endometriosis associated pain.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The study is a prospective, dose-finding, randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b study investigating the efficacy and safety of OBE2109 in the treatment of 330 women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis associated pain.

Subject will be randomized to one of 6 treatment groups in a 1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio (1 placebo group, 5 dose groups with different dosage/regimen).

Eligible subjects will be offered the opportunity to continue treatment with OBE2109 in an extension phase. Subjects who do not continue in the extension will enter the treatment-free follow-up phase of the study.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
OBE2109 50 mgExperimentalDrug: OBE2109
OBE2109 75mg fixed dose (FD)ExperimentalDrug: OBE2109
OBE2109 75mg titrated dose (TD)ExperimentalDrug: OBE2109
OBE2109 100mgExperimentalDrug: OBE2109
OBE2109 200 mgExperimentalDrug: OBE2109
Placebo / OBE2109 100mgPlacebo comparatorDrug: Placebo; Drug: OBE2109Participants received placebo for the first 12 weeks and were then crossed-over to active treatment with OBE2109 100mg for a further 12 weeks.
  • Placebo (Drug): Placebo tablets for oral administration once daily
  • OBE2109 (Drug): OBE2109 tablets for oral administration once daily

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Overall Pelvic Pain Score (0-3 VRS) [From baseline to week 12]: The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was a response at Week 12, with response defined as a reduction of 30% or greater from baseline in the mean overall pelvic pain score, defined as the mean of daily pain scores reported in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a Verbal Rating Scale for pelvic pain of 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period. The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.

Secondary outcomes

  • Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Overall Pelvic Pain Score (0-10 NRS) [From baseline to week 12]: This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean overall pelvic pain score, defined as the mean of daily pain scores reported in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pelvic pain of 0 (no pelvic pain) to 10 (worst pelvic pain imaginable). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period. The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
  • Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Pelvic Pain Scores (0-3 VRS) for Days With Uterine Bleeding [From baseline to week 12]: This endpoint corresponds to a response at Week 12, with response defined as a reduction of 30% or greater from baseline in the mean pelvic pain score for days with uterine bleeding/spotting, defined as the mean of daily pain scores on days with uterine bleeding/spotting recorded in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a Verbal Rating Scale for pelvic pain of 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period. The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
  • Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Pelvic Pain Scores (0-3 VRS) for Days With no Uterine Bleeding [From baseline to week 12]: This endpoint corresponds to a response at Week 12, with response defined as a reduction of 30% or greater from baseline in the mean pelvic pain score for days with no uterine bleeding, defined as the mean of daily pain scores on days with no uterine bleeding recorded in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period) on a Verbal Rating Scale for pelvic pain of 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period. The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
  • Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Dyspareunia Score (0-3 VRS) [From baseline to week 12]: This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean dyspareunia score, defined as the mean of daily dyspareunia scores recorded in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a 0-3 Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) for dyspareunia, with 0 representing "No discomfort during sexual intercourse" and 3 representing "I avoided sexual intercourse because of pain". The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period. The dyspareunia questionnaire also included an option "not applicable: I was not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse"; for scoring, answering "not applicable" was considered like a missing value. The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
  • Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Dyschezia Score (0-10 NRS) [From baseline to week 12]: This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to week 12 in the mean dyschezia score, defined as the mean of weekly dyschezia scores reported in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale for dyschezia, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of weekly scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period. The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
  • Percentage of Subjects With Any Analgesics Use at Week 12 [Up to week 12]: This endpoint corresponds to the percentage of subjects at week 12 who recorded at least one pain medication intake in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period).
  • Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Score of Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Domain [From baseline to week 12]: This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean score of pain dimension of the EHP-30. The EHP-30 questionnaire was answered on electronic diary after activation by site staff during subject's monthly visits at site. The EHP-30 pain dimension consists of 11 items each addressing the effect of pain on various activities in the past 4 weeks and each assessed on a 5-point scale (0=Never through to 4=Always). Scaled score was equalled to total of raw score of each item in scale divided by the maximum possible raw score of all the items in the dimension, multiplied by 100, resulting in a score on a scale from 0 (best possible health status) to 100 (worst possible health status). The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
  • Percentage of Subjects With Improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 12 [Up to week 12]: The PGIC questionnaire consists of one question rated on a seven point scale (1="Very Much Improved" to 7="Very Much Worse"), with which the subject had to qualify her overall status since the start of the study. The PGIC was answered on electronic diary after activation by site staff during Week 12 visit at site. This endpoint corresponds to the percentage of subjects with an "improvement" in the PGIC score, which includes all subjects who answered "Very much improved" or "Much improved" or "Minimally improved" at Week 12.
  • Percentage of Subjects With an Endometriosis Severity Score of "Severe" at Week 12 [Up to week 12]: Subject was asked monthly on electronic diary to assess their impression of endometriosis severity, considering the preceding 4-weeks, with following possible answers: no symptoms, very mild, mild, moderate, severe. This question was programmed to raise automatically every 4 weeks on the subject electronic diary. Result reported here is the percentage of subjects who answered "severe" at week 12.
  • Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Difficulty in Doing Daily Activities Mean Score [From baseline to week 12]: This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean of daily scores for "difficulty in doing daily activities", assessed via electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 (no difficulty doing daily activities) to 10 (unable to do daily activities). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period. The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.
  • Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) [From baseline up to week 24]: Change from baseline to Week 24 in BMD assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan of LUMBAR SPINE.
  • Number of Non Benign Endometrial Biopsies at Week 24 [Week 24]: Any pathological changes in the endometrium at week 24 were assessed from endometrial biopsies. The number of non benign biopsies at Week 24 is presented per treatment arm. Note: an isolated case of hyperplasia (without atypia) was observed at week 12 in the 200 mg group in a subject whose screening biopsy results were normal. A follow-up biopsy at week 24 revealed no abnormalities.
  • Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endometrial Thickness Measured by Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS) [From baseline up to week 24]: The endometrium thickness was measured by TVUS at screening and at Week 24 visit by the gynaecologist and result was recorded in mm. This endpoint reports the changes from baseline to Week 24 in the endometrial thickness.
  • Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Clinical Laboratory Assessments: LDL [From baseline up to week 24]: This endpoint reports the change from baseline up to Week 24 in the clinical laboratory assessments: LDL cholesterol.
  • Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Laboratory Assessments: HDL [From Baseline up to week 24]: This endpoint reports the change from baseline to week 24 in clinical laboratory assessments: HDL cholesterol.
  • Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Laboratory Assessments: Triglycerides [From baseline up to week 24]: This endpoint reports the change from baseline to week 24 in clinical laboratory assessments: triglycerides.

+Eligibility

Sex: Female, ages: 18 Years to 45 Years

Key Inclusion Criteria:

* The subject must have had her most recent surgical and - if available - histological, diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis up to 10 years before screening.
* The subject has moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain during the screening period.
* The subject has regular menstrual cycles.
* The subject has a BMI ≥ 18 kg/m2 at the screening visit.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

* The subject is pregnant or breast feeding or is planning a pregnancy within the duration of the treatment period of the study.
* The subject had an interventional surgery for endometriosis performed within a period of 60 days before screening.
* The subject did not respond to prior treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or GnRH antagonists for endometriosis.
* The subject has a history of, or known osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease.
* The subject has chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis and requires chronic analgesic / therapy, or that would interfere with the assessment of endometriosis related pain.

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestonePlacebo / OBE2109 100mgOBE2109 50mgOBE2109 75mg FDOBE2109 75mg TDOBE2109 100mgOBE2109 200mg
Started544957585357
Included in safety set544957585257
Included in fas534956585156
Completed454553514549
Not completed944788

Outcome results

  • Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Overall Pelvic Pain Score (0-3 VRS) (Primary), Number, percentage of subjects: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg 34.5; OBE2109 50mg 49.4; OBE2109 75mg FD + TD 61.5; OBE2109 100mg 56.4; OBE2109 200mg 56.3
  • Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Overall Pelvic Pain Score (0-10 NRS) (Secondary), Mean, score on a scale: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg -1.17 (-1.70 to -0.65); OBE2109 50mg -1.75 (-2.29 to -1.20); OBE2109 75mg FD + TD -2.15 (-2.50 to -1.80); OBE2109 100mg -2.06 (-2.60 to -1.52); OBE2109 200mg -2.14 (-2.65 to -1.63)
  • Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Pelvic Pain Scores (0-3 VRS) for Days With Uterine Bleeding (Secondary), Number, percentage of subjects: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg 28.5; OBE2109 50mg 43.3; OBE2109 75mg FD + TD 68.2; OBE2109 100mg 68.6; OBE2109 200mg 78.9
  • Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Pelvic Pain Scores (0-3 VRS) for Days With no Uterine Bleeding (Secondary), Number, percentage of subjects: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg 37.1; OBE2109 50mg 46.2; OBE2109 75mg FD + TD 58.5; OBE2109 100mg 61.5; OBE2109 200mg 47.7
  • Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Dyspareunia Score (0-3 VRS) (Secondary), Mean, score on a scale: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg -0.39 (-0.63 to -0.16); OBE2109 50mg -0.62 (-0.87 to -0.37); OBE2109 75mg FD + TD -0.59 (-0.76 to -0.43); OBE2109 100mg -0.66 (-0.91 to -0.41); OBE2109 200mg -0.79 (-1.03 to -0.54)
  • Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Dyschezia Score (0-10 NRS) (Secondary), Mean, score on a scale/week: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg -0.78 (-1.34 to -0.22); OBE2109 50mg -1.55 (-2.14 to -0.96); OBE2109 75mg FD + TD -1.87 (-2.25 to -1.49); OBE2109 100mg -1.97 (-2.55 to -1.39); OBE2109 200mg -1.7 (-2.25 to -1.15)
  • Percentage of Subjects With Any Analgesics Use at Week 12 (Secondary), Number, percentage of subjects: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg 90.6 (78.6 to 96.2); OBE2109 50mg 77.1 (62.7 to 87.1); OBE2109 75mg FD + TD 74.8 (65.7 to 82.1); OBE2109 100mg 68.8 (54.1 to 80.5); OBE2109 200mg 72.1 (58.4 to 82.7)
  • Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Score of Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Domain (Secondary), Mean, score on a scale: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg -7.4 (-12.36 to -2.41); OBE2109 50mg -18.5 (-23.44 to -13.47); OBE2109 75mg FD + TD -18.9 (-22.20 to -15.69); OBE2109 100mg -19.4 (-24.28 to -14.55); OBE2109 200mg -20.9 (-25.69 to -16.10)
  • Percentage of Subjects With Improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 12 (Secondary), Number, percentage of subjects: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg 65.1; OBE2109 50mg 78.6; OBE2109 75mg FD + TD 80.6; OBE2109 100mg 86; OBE2109 200mg 95.7
  • Percentage of Subjects With an Endometriosis Severity Score of "Severe" at Week 12 (Secondary), Number, percentage of subjects: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg 20.9; OBE2109 50mg 4.5; OBE2109 75mg FD + TD 7.8; OBE2109 100mg 4.5; OBE2109 200mg 4.2
  • Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Difficulty in Doing Daily Activities Mean Score (Secondary), Mean, score on a scale: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg -1.17 (-1.68 to -0.65); OBE2109 50mg -1.65 (-2.18 to -1.12); OBE2109 75mg FD + TD -2.06 (-2.41 to -1.72); OBE2109 100mg -1.88 (-2.41 to -1.36); OBE2109 200mg -1.99 (-2.49 to -1.49)
  • Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) (Secondary), Mean, percentage change: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg -0.929 (-1.71 to -0.15); OBE2109 50mg 0.137 (-0.83 to 1.11); OBE2109 75mg FD -0.798 (-1.57 to -0.03); OBE2109 75mg TD -1.000 (-1.71 to -0.29); OBE2109 100mg -1.365 (-2.14 to -0.59); OBE2109 200mg -2.602 (-3.56 to -1.65)
  • Number of Non Benign Endometrial Biopsies at Week 24 (Secondary), Number, Non benign biopsies: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg 0; OBE2109 50mg 0; OBE2109 75mg FD 0; OBE2109 75mg TD 0; OBE2109 100mg 0; OBE2109 200mg 0
  • Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endometrial Thickness Measured by Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS) (Secondary), Mean, mm: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg -3.1 +/- 4.64; OBE2109 50mg -1.5 +/- 4.28; OBE2109 75mg FD -2.3 +/- 4.15; OBE2109 75mg TD -1.3 +/- 3.70; OBE2109 100mg -1.6 +/- 4.56; OBE2109 200mg -4.0 +/- 3.39
  • Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Clinical Laboratory Assessments: LDL (Secondary), Mean, percent change: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg 1.7 +/- 15.7; OBE2109 50mg -0.3 +/- 16.6; OBE2109 75mg FD 7.4 +/- 55.2; OBE2109 75mg TD 7.3 +/- 21.4; OBE2109 100mg 9.7 +/- 20.7; OBE2109 200mg 10.3 +/- 21.7
  • Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Laboratory Assessments: HDL (Secondary), Mean, percent change: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg 5.5 +/- 11.7; OBE2109 50mg 2.9 +/- 12.9; OBE2109 75mg FD 3.8 +/- 17.8; OBE2109 75mg TD 6.2 +/- 24.1; OBE2109 100mg 5.6 +/- 18.0; OBE2109 200mg 8.1 +/- 14.7
  • Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Laboratory Assessments: Triglycerides (Secondary), Mean, percent change: Placebo / OBE2109 100mg 17.9 +/- 38.6; OBE2109 50mg 16.4 +/- 41.3; OBE2109 75mg FD 5.2 +/- 35.2; OBE2109 75mg TD 13.6 +/- 45.0; OBE2109 100mg 20.5 +/- 80.6; OBE2109 200mg 24.0 +/- 57.7

Adverse events

Time frame: From baseline up to week 24

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Placebo BL-Wk120/55 (0.0%)1/55 (1.8%)22/55 (40.0%)
OBE2109 100mg Wk12-Wk240/55 (0.0%)0/55 (0.0%)19/55 (34.5%)
OBE2109 50mg BL-Wk240/49 (0.0%)1/49 (2.0%)27/49 (55.1%)
OBE2109 75mg FD BL-Wk240/58 (0.0%)0/58 (0.0%)30/58 (51.7%)
OBE2109 75mg TD BL-Wk240/56 (0.0%)0/56 (0.0%)36/56 (64.3%)
OBE2109 100mg BL-Wk240/52 (0.0%)3/52 (5.8%)31/52 (59.6%)
OBE2109 200mg BL-Wk240/57 (0.0%)1/57 (1.8%)39/57 (68.4%)

Serious adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemPlacebo BL-Wk12OBE2109 100mg Wk12-Wk24OBE2109 50mg BL-Wk24OBE2109 75mg FD BL-Wk24OBE2109 75mg TD BL-Wk24OBE2109 100mg BL-Wk24OBE2109 200mg BL-Wk24
Ectopic pregnancyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/550/550/490/580/561/520/57
EnterocolitisGastrointestinal disorders0/550/550/490/580/561/520/57
MetrorrhagiaReproductive system and breast disorders0/550/550/490/580/561/520/57
Pulmonary EmbolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/550/550/490/580/560/521/57
Pyelonephritis acuteInfections and infestations0/550/551/490/580/560/520/57
Stab woundInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/550/550/490/580/560/520/57

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemPlacebo BL-Wk12OBE2109 100mg Wk12-Wk24OBE2109 50mg BL-Wk24OBE2109 75mg FD BL-Wk24OBE2109 75mg TD BL-Wk24OBE2109 100mg BL-Wk24OBE2109 200mg BL-Wk24
abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders1/552/551/490/581/564/521/57
acneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/550/552/493/582/560/521/57
arthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/550/551/490/581/563/529/57
back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/551/553/490/582/560/520/57
blood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigations1/551/551/494/585/562/524/57
bronchitisInfections and infestations0/550/550/492/580/561/523/57
dizzinessNervous system disorders0/550/551/493/581/562/522/57
fatigueGeneral disorders0/550/551/490/580/564/522/57
headacheNervous system disorders14/559/5512/4910/5816/5615/5217/57
hot flushVascular disorders6/555/559/4911/5813/5615/5226/57
influenzaInfections and infestations0/551/551/490/580/563/520/57
libido decreasedPsychiatric disorders0/551/550/491/580/560/523/57
mood swingsPsychiatric disorders5/551/552/491/583/563/522/57
nasopharyngitisInfections and infestations3/551/558/497/584/562/521/57
nauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/550/553/492/582/564/527/57
pyrexiaGeneral disorders0/550/552/490/581/561/523/57
toothacheGastrointestinal disorders3/551/553/492/580/560/521/57
urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations0/550/551/493/583/562/525/57
vulvovaginal drynessReproductive system and breast disorders0/550/550/490/581/562/523/57
weight increasedInvestigations0/551/552/490/581/563/521/57

+Locations (86)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Site reference ID 455Chandler, ArizonaUnited States
Site reference ID 439Scottsdale, ArizonaUnited States
Site reference ID 462Arcadia, CaliforniaUnited States
Site reference ID 405Chino, CaliforniaUnited States
Site reference ID 463Huntington Park, CaliforniaUnited States
Site refenrec ID 469Northridge, CaliforniaUnited States
Site reference ID 431San Diego, CaliforniaUnited States
Site reference ID 440Tustin, CaliforniaUnited States
Site reference ID 474Denver, ColoradoUnited States
Site reference ID 450Lakewood, ColoradoUnited States
Site reference ID 425Longmont, ColoradoUnited States
Site reference ID 410Washington D.C., District of ColumbiaUnited States
Site reference ID 457Boca Raton, FloridaUnited States
Site reference ID 418Clearwater, FloridaUnited States
Site reference ID 437Gainesville, FloridaUnited States
Site reference ID 458Jensen Beach, FloridaUnited States
Site reference ID 411Miami, FloridaUnited States
Site reference ID 424Miami, FloridaUnited States
Site reference ID 435Miami, FloridaUnited States
Site reference ID 420Miami Lakes, FloridaUnited States
Site reference ID 441Miami Springs, FloridaUnited States
Site reference ID 423New Port Richey, FloridaUnited States
Site reference ID 426Tampa, FloridaUnited States
Site reference ID 442Wellington, FloridaUnited States
Site reference ID 428Atlanta, GeorgiaUnited States
Site reference ID 459Atlanta, GeorgiaUnited States
Site reference ID 475Nampa, IdahoUnited States
Site reference ID 465Oak Brook, IllinoisUnited States
Site reference ID 404Shawnee Mission, KansasUnited States
Site reference ID 456Wichita, KansasUnited States
Site reference ID 454Marrero, LouisianaUnited States
Site reference ID 453Metairie, LouisianaUnited States
Site reference ID 478Glen Burnie, MarylandUnited States
Site reference ID 445Fall River, MassachusettsUnited States
Site reference ID 471Fall River, MassachusettsUnited States
Site reference ID 430Ann Arbor, MichiganUnited States
Site reference ID 409Bay City, MichiganUnited States
Site reference ID 468Saginaw, MichiganUnited States
Site reference ID 473Saginaw, MichiganUnited States
Site reference ID 427Southfield, MichiganUnited States
Site reference ID 421Albuquerque, New MexicoUnited States
Site reference ID 466New York, New YorkUnited States
Site reference ID 436Greensboro, North CarolinaUnited States
Site reference ID 433Morehead City, North CarolinaUnited States
Site reference ID 443Dayton, OhioUnited States
Site reference ID 472Franklin, OhioUnited States
Site reference ID 415Tiffin, OhioUnited States
Site reference ID 414Westerville, OhioUnited States
Site reference ID 419Bryn Mawr, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Site reference ID 449Jenkintown, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Site reference ID 476Columbia, South CarolinaUnited States
Site reference ID 408Bristol, TennesseeUnited States
Site reference ID 403Chattanooga, TennesseeUnited States
Site reference ID 429Nashville, TennesseeUnited States
Site reference ID 452Austin, TexasUnited States
Site reference ID 461Beaumont, TexasUnited States
Site reference ID 447Dallas, TexasUnited States
Site reference ID 460Dallas, TexasUnited States
Site reference ID 464Fort Worth, TexasUnited States
Site reference ID 413Houston, TexasUnited States
Site reference ID 434Houston, TexasUnited States
Site reference ID 479Houston, TexasUnited States
Site reference ID 451San Antonio, TexasUnited States
Site reference ID 402Schertz, TexasUnited States
Site reference ID 432Webster, TexasUnited States
Site reference ID 422Draper, UtahUnited States
Site reference ID 467Centreville, VirginiaUnited States
Site reference ID 407Norfolk, VirginiaUnited States
Site reference ID 412Richmond, VirginiaUnited States
Site reference ID 417Richmond, VirginiaUnited States
Site reference ID 406Seattle, WashingtonUnited States
Site reference ID 101KatowicePoland
Site reference ID 102KatowicePoland
Site reference ID 104LublinPoland
Site reference ID 105LublinPoland
Site reference ID 103SzczecinPoland
Site reference ID 201MoscowRussia
Site reference ID 202MoscowRussia
Site reference ID 203MoscowRussia
Site reference ID 204MoscowRussia
Site reference ID 205Saint PetersburgRussia
Site reference ID 305Ivano-FrankivskUkraine
Site reefrence ID 303KyivUkraine
Site reference ID 301KyivUkraine
Site reference ID 302KyivUkraine
SIte reference ID 304KyivUkraine

+Publications

  • Results publication: Donnez J, Taylor HS, Taylor RN, Akin MD, Tatarchuk TF, Wilk K, Gotteland JP, Lecomte V, Bestel E. Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with linzagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone-antagonist: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2020 Jul;114(1):44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.02.114. Epub 2020 Jun 4. PMID 32505383

+Study documents

+Investigators