D1 and D2 Dopamine Receptors in Gambling and Amphetamine Reinforcement

NCT02203786 — Phase 2, Completed, 60 participants, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Comparative Effects of a D2 and Mixed D1-D2 Dopamine Antagonist on Gambling and Amphetamine Reinforcement in Pathological Gamblers and Healthy Controls

RegistryNCT02203786, acronym HFDEX
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 2
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: triple, diagnostic
Enrollment60 (Actual)
SponsorCentre for Addiction and Mental Health (Other); collaborators: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
ConditionsPathological Gambling
InterventionsHaloperidol, Fluphenazine, Dexedrine, Placebo, Slot Machine (Drug, behavioral)
Datesstart 2009-09-01, primary completion 2015-06-01, completion 2015-09-01, first posted 2014-07-30, last updated 2016-04-25
Locations1 site in Canada

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Pathological Gambling All trials of Haloperidol All trials of Fluphenazine

-Summary

To determine if:

1. pathological gambling is similar to psychostimulant addiction as reflected by parallel roles for D1 and D2 receptors in gambling and stimulant reinforcement.
2. these parallel roles are linked with gambling pathology or if they are evident in both gamblers and controls.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

BACKGROUND: No previous research appears to have investigated the role of dopamine (DA) D1 or D2 receptors in psychostimulant reinforcement in pathological gamblers. Effects of haloperidol vs. placebo will reveal the role of D2 and the effects of fluphenazine vs. haloperidol will reveal the role of D1 in this process.

OBJECTIVE: This study will begin to define the neurochemistry of Pathological Gambling by examining the roles of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in gambling reinforcement and psychostimulant reinforcement, and exploring genetic predictors of response to DA probes in Pathological Gambling subjects (subjects) and healthy controls.

METHODS: A double-blind, placebo controlled, counterbalanced between-within design will be employed. Each participant will attend 4 sessions with a minimum of 1 week between sessions to ensure drug washout. Responses to the slot machine will be assessed in sessions 1 and 2 (Phase I), and responses to amphetamine will be assessed in sessions 3 and 4 (Phase II). A second capsule (dummy) will be administered at expected peak levels for each antagonist on sessions 1 and 2 to standardize the procedure across sessions.

Subjective reinforcement self-report scales will be administered at key intervals throughout the study.

HYPOTHESIS: It is hypothesized that haloperidol (3-mg) will increase priming (Desire to Gamble, Gambling word salience) and pleasurable effects (e.g., Enjoyment/Liking) induced by playing a slot machine in Pathological Gambling subjects (N = 40). If gambling and stimulant reinforcement are mediated by common mechanisms, haloperidol will also increase priming and pleasurable effects of amphetamine (20-mg) in Pathological Gambling subjects.

If D1 mediates effects of haloperidol, the mixed D1-D2 antagonist, fluphenazine (fluphenazine; 3-mg) will decrease or not alter responses to the slot machine and amphetamine in Pathological Gambling subjects. If D2 deficits are linked with gambling pathology, haloperidol will not affect slot machine or amphetamine reinforcement in controls (N= 40).

If D1 deficits are linked with gambling pathology, fluphenazine will increase gambling and amphetamine reinforcement in controls, by mitigating undue D1 activation in subjects with high baseline D1 function. If D1 or D2 genes contribute to gambling or amphetamine reinforcement, genotype will predict responses to the manipulations.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
HaloperidolActive comparatorDrug: Haloperidol; Drug: Dexedrine; Drug: Placebo; Behavioral: Slot MachineSubjects randomized to pre-treatment drug sequence 1 (haloperidol on day 1 of each phase), or drug sequence 2 (haloperidol on day 2 of each phase). Dose 1: 3 visually identical capsules, each containing 1 mg haloperidol OR 3 visually identical placebo (lactose) capsules Dose 2: when participants reach expected peak blood levels for dose 1, they will receive their second dose. On sessions 1 and 2 (Phase I), this will consist of 2 dummy capsules, visually identical to those administered for dose 1. On sessions 3 and 4 (Phase II), the dose will consist of 2 visually identical capsules each containing 10 mg dexedrine. Response measured to 15 min session of a commercial slot machine game.
FluphenazineActive comparatorDrug: Fluphenazine; Drug: Dexedrine; Drug: Placebo; Behavioral: Slot MachineSubjects randomized to pre-treatment drug sequence 1 (fluphenazine on day 1 of each phase), or drug sequence 2 (fluphenazine on day 2 of each phase). Dose 1: 3 visually identical capsules, each containing 1 mg fluphenazine OR 3 visually identical placebo (lactose) capsules Dose 2: when participants reach expected peak blood levels for dose 1, they will receive their second dose. On sessions 1 and 2 (Phase I), this will consist of 2 dummy capsules, visually identical to those administered for dose 1. On sessions 3 and 4 (Phase II), the dose will consist of 2 visually identical capsules each containing 10 mg dexedrine. Response measured to 15 min session of a commercial slot machine game.
  • Haloperidol (Drug), also known as Teva-Haloperidol, DIN: 00396818, Haldol: Dose/maximum dose = 3-mg; route = oral. Participants assigned to the haloperidol antagonist group will receive 2 doses (@ 3 mg) on alternate sessions (with minimum of 2 weeks between individual doses). Dose 1: 3 visually identical capsules, each containing 1 mg haloperidol.
  • Fluphenazine (Drug), also known as APO-Fluphenazine, DIN: 00405345, Prolixin, Permitil: Dose/maximum dose = 3-mg; route = oral. Participants assigned to the fluphenazine antagonist group will receive 2 doses (@ 3 mg) on alternate sessions (with minimum of 2 weeks between individual doses). Dose 1: 3 visually identical capsules, each containing 1 mg fluphenazine.
  • Dexedrine (Drug), also known as Dextro-amphetamine sulphate, DIN: 01924516, D-amphetamine: Dose/maximum dose = 20-mg; route = oral. All participants will receive 2 doses (@ 20 mg) during Phase II - sessions 3, 4, with minimum 1 week between individual doses. Dose 2: when participants reach expected peak blood levels for dose 1, they will receive their second dose. On sessions 3 and 4 (Phase II), the dose will consist of 2 visually identical capsules each containing 10 mg D-amphetamine.
  • Placebo (Drug), also known as lactose capsule: Dose 1: On alternate sessions (1 and 3 or 2 and 4, depending on counterbalancing) participants will receive 3 visually identical placebo (lactose) capsules. Dose 2: when participants reach expected peak blood levels for dose 1, they will receive their second dose. On sessions 1 and 2 (Phase I), this will consist of 2 dummy capsules, visually identical to those administered for dose 1.
  • Slot Machine (Behavioral), also known as reward cue: 15 minute play of a commercial slot machine game in bar-simulated laboratory setting.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Subjective Reinforcement Self-report Scales [At key points in testing: immediately after the slot machine game, and at expected peak subjective-behavioral effects for amphetamine (90-minutes post-capsule administration).]: Self-reported Confidence to Refrain from Gambling (0 - 10) was assessed at test session baseline, before the slot machine and after the slot machine (Phase 1); and before amphetamine and at peak amphetamine (Phase 2). The maximum score (10) denotes complete confidence to refrain from gambling (i.e., NO urge or compulsion to gamble); the minimum score (0) denotes complete lack of confidence to refrain from gambling (i.e., overwhelming urge to gamble). Scores between 10 and 0 denote intermediate confidence to refrain from gambling with LOWER scores denoting less confidence to refrain from gambling -- i.e., GREATER urge or compulsive motivation to gamble. Scores shown are based on single item visual analogue ratings 0-10 from each participant at the specified time point. The mean (SD) of these single item ratings is presented for each sub-group.

Secondary outcomes

  • Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) [At key points in testing: immediately after the slot machine game (change from session baseline), and at expected peak subjective-behavioral effects for amphetamine (90-minutes post-capsule administration)(change from session baseline).]: Measure changes from baseline, especially physiologic reactivity to the slot machine and amphetamine.
  • Cognitive Task Performance [At key points during testing: immediately after the slot machine, at expected peak subjective-behavioral effects for amphetamine (90-minutes post-capsule administration)]: Response time to words (gambling, alcohol, positive affect, negative affect) as a percentage of neutral categorized words (parts of a building). This provides an index of the relative salience of stimuli from these four categories against a baseline of reaction to words with no clinical relevance or emotional valence. Smaller scores indicate faster relative response time to the test stimuli vs. neutral stimuli (i.e., greater salience)
  • Betting Behaviour in Laboratory-based Slot Machine Game [1x per test session (total of 4 test sessions) for duration of the study: 4 weeks (1 session/week)]: Risk taking was operationally defined as credits wagered per spin (mean computed for total spins)
  • Speed of Play on Slot Machine Game [15-minutes]: Number of individual spins in a 15-minute slot machine game. Each spin corresponds to one wager.
  • Winnings on Slot Machine Upon Completion of Game [15-minutes]: Credits

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 19 Years to 65 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLERS
* otherwise healthy, non-treatment seeking, non-abstinent
* male or female
* ages 19-65
* DSM-IV PG symptom scale score > 5
* SOGS (South Oaks Gambling Screen) score > 5
* nicotine dependence acceptable
* CONTROLS
* healthy
* male or female
* ages 19-65
* DSM-IV PG symptom scale score = 0
* SOGS score = 0
* nicotine dependence acceptable
* must have played slot machine > 5 times

Exclusion Criteria:

* both Pathological Gamblers and Controls
* Axis I psychopathology aside from nicotine dependence (or PG) based on SCID
* Schizotypal or Borderline Personality Disorder based on psychiatric interview
* Family history of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
* English comprehension below grade 7 level.
* ADS (Alcohol Dependence Scale) > 13 (more than low dependence)
* BDI (Beck Depression Inventory) short form > 10 (more than low depression)
* DAST (Drug Abuse Screening Test) > 4 (possible drug abuse)
* Consumption of > 20/15 (men/women) standard alcoholic drinks/ week (hazardous drinking)
* Smoking > 20 cigarettes/day to help minimize withdrawal symptoms during test phase
* Any prior use of psychostimulant drugs
* Current use of medication that could interact with any of the study medications
* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneHaloperidol - Pathological GamblersFluphenazine - Pathological GamblersHaloperidol - ControlsFluphenazine - Controls
Started15151715
Completed15151515
Not completed0020

Outcome results

  • Subjective Reinforcement Self-report Scales (Primary), Mean, units on a scale: Haloperidol - Pathological Gamblers 4.8 +/- 2.3; Fluphenazine - Pathological Gamblers 4.8 +/- 2.9; Haloperidol - Controls 9.5 +/- 1.1; Fluphenazine - Controls 9.3 +/- 1
  • Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) (Secondary), Mean, mm Hg: Haloperidol - Pathological Gamblers 20.2 +/- 24.5; Fluphenazine - Pathological Gamblers 22 +/- 23.6; Haloperidol - Controls 15.1 +/- 18.6; Fluphenazine - Controls 23.6 +/- 23.8
  • Cognitive Task Performance (Secondary), Mean, percentage of neutral categorized words: Haloperidol - Pathological Gamblers 91.6 +/- 7.9; Fluphenazine - Pathological Gamblers 94.0 +/- 6.0; Haloperidol - Controls 94.8 +/- 6.1; Fluphenazine - Controls 91.0 +/- 7.9
  • Betting Behaviour in Laboratory-based Slot Machine Game (Secondary), Mean, credits/spin on slot machine: Haloperidol - Pathological Gamblers 12.8 +/- 7.2; Fluphenazine - Pathological Gamblers 16.0 +/- 10.4; Haloperidol - Controls 11.6 +/- 7.8; Fluphenazine - Controls 14.4 +/- 10.0
  • Speed of Play on Slot Machine Game (Secondary), Mean, individual spins/15-minutes: Haloperidol - Pathological Gamblers 76.9 +/- 35.4; Fluphenazine - Pathological Gamblers 78.5 +/- 34.5; Haloperidol - Controls 66.4 +/- 27.9; Fluphenazine - Controls 71.8 +/- 30.5
  • Winnings on Slot Machine Upon Completion of Game (Secondary), Mean, credits: Haloperidol - Pathological Gamblers 239 +/- 305.1; Fluphenazine - Pathological Gamblers 277.8 +/- 300.2; Haloperidol - Controls 449.1 +/- 669.6; Fluphenazine - Controls 544.3 +/- 820

Adverse events

Time frame: Same day as drug administration

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Haloperidol - Pathological Gamblers00/15 (0.0%)0/15 (0.0%)
Fluphenazine - Pathological Gamblers00/15 (0.0%)0/15 (0.0%)
Haloperidol - Controls00/15 (0.0%)2/15 (13.3%)
Fluphenazine - Controls00/15 (0.0%)0/15 (0.0%)

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemHaloperidol - Pathological GamblersFluphenazine - Pathological GamblersHaloperidol - ControlsFluphenazine - Controls
AkathisiaNervous system disorders0/150/152/150/15

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthToronto, OntarioCanada

+Publications

  • APA (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. IV-TR ed. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.
  • Enggasser JL, de Wit H. Haloperidol reduces stimulant and reinforcing effects of ethanol in social drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001 Oct;25(10):1448-56. PMID 11696664
  • Holley FO, Magliozzi JR, Stanski DR, Lombrozo L, Hollister LE. Haloperidol kinetics after oral and intravenous doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1983 Apr;33(4):477-84. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1983.65. PMID 6831826
  • Lesieur HR, Blume SB. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Sep;144(9):1184-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.9.1184. PMID 3631315
  • Midha KK, McKay G, Edom R, Korchinski ED, Hawes EM, Hall K. Kinetics of oral fluphenazine disposition in humans by GC-MS. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983;25(5):709-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00542363. PMID 6662169
  • Wachtel SR, Ortengren A, de Wit H. The effects of acute haloperidol or risperidone on subjective responses to methamphetamine in healthy volunteers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002 Sep 1;68(1):23-33. doi: 10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00104-7. PMID 12167550
  • Wong YN, Wang L, Hartman L, Simcoe D, Chen Y, Laughton W, Eldon R, Markland C, Grebow P. Comparison of the single-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of modafinil and dextroamphetamine administered alone or in combination in healthy male volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Oct;38(10):971-8. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04395.x. PMID 9807980
  • Results publication: Zack M, Lobo D, Biback C, Fang T, Smart K, Tatone D, Kalia A, Digiacomo D, Kennedy JL. Priming effects of a slot machine game and amphetamine on probabilistic risk-taking in people with gambling disorder and healthy controls. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2023 Feb;45(1):31-60. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2023.2187041. Epub 2023 Mar 15. PMID 36919514

+Investigators