Efficacy and Safety Study of ABP 501 Compared to Adalimumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

NCT01970475 — Phase 3, Completed, 526 participants, Amgen

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 Study of ABP 501 Efficacy and Safety Compared to Adalimumab in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

RegistryNCT01970475
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: quadruple, treatment
Enrollment526 (Actual)
SponsorAmgen (Industry)
ConditionsArthritis, Rheumatoid
InterventionsABP 501, Adalimumab (Biological)
Datesstart 2013-10-01, primary completion 2014-11-01, completion 2014-11-01, first posted 2013-10-28, last updated 2016-12-13
Locations11 sites in United States, Canada, Germany, United Kingdom

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Arthritis, Rheumatoid All trials of ABP 501 All trials of Adalimumab

-Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of ABP 501 against adalimumab (HUMIRA®) in adults with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX).

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
ABP 501ExperimentalBiological: ABP 501Participants received ABP 501 40 mg subcutaneously on day 1 and every 2 weeks thereafter until week 22.
AdalimumabActive comparatorBiological: AdalimumabParticipants received adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously on day 1 and every 2 weeks thereafter until week 22.
  • ABP 501 (Biological), also known as AMJEVITA™, Adalimumab-atto: Solution for subcutaneous injection in pre-filled syringe
  • Adalimumab (Biological), also known as HUMIRA®: Solution for subcutaneous injection in pre-filled syringe

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24 [Baseline and Week 24]: A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-Reactive Protein level.

Secondary outcomes

  • Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) [Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24]: The DAS28-CRP is a composite score to measure disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, derived from the following variables: * The number of swollen and tender joints assessed using the 28-joint count; * C-reactive protein (CRP) level * Patient's global assessment of disease activity assessed on a score from 0 to 100 transformed from the result measured on a horizontal scale from 0 (no RA activity at all) to 10 (worst RA activity imaginable). The DAS28-CRP score ranges from approximately zero to ten. Higher DAS28-CRP scores indicate higher disease activity. A repeated measures analysis with the DAS28-CRP change from baseline as the response and the stratification variables, visit, treatment, treatment-by-visit interaction and the baseline DAS28-CRP measurement as predictors in the model was performed.
  • Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 2 and Week 8 [Baseline, week 2 and week 8]: A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 20% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-Reactive Protein level.
  • Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24 [Baseline and week 24]: A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-Reactive Protein level.
  • Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24 [Baseline and Week 24]: A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: * ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; * ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and * ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: * Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); * Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10); * Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a likert scale from 0 to 10); * Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index \[HAQ-DI\]); * C-Reactive Protein level.
  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events [From the time of first treatment up to 28 days following the last dose of study treatment; 26 weeks.]: Adverse events (AEs) were graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 according to the following scale: 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe; 4 = life-threatening; 5 = fatal. A treatment-related AE is defined as an event where the answer to the question "is there a reasonable possibility that the event may have been caused by the Investigational Medicinal Product" was yes. A serious adverse event is defined as an AE that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: * fatal * life threatening (places the subject at immediate risk of death) * requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization * results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * congenital anomaly/birth defect * other medically important serious event.
  • Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to ABP 501 or Adalimumab [Up to week 26]: Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-drug antibodies. Samples were first tested in an electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based bridging immunoassay to detect anti-drug antibodies (ADA) against ABP 501 and adalimumab (Binding Antibody Assay). Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a non-cell based bioassay to determine neutralizing activity against ABP 501 or adalimumab (Neutralizing Antibody Assay). Developing antibody incidence is defined as a negative or no antibody result at baseline and a positive antibody result at a post-baseline time point.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Men or women ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old
2. Subjects must be diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis for at least 3 months before baseline
3. Active RA defined as ≥ 6 swollen joints and ≥ 6 tender joints at screening and baseline
4. Subjects must be taking MTX for ≥ 12 consecutive weeks and on a stable dose of 7.5 to 25 mg/week for > 8 weeks prior to receiving the study drug and be willing to remain on stable dose throughout the study
5. Subject has no known history of active tuberculosis

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Class IV RA, Felty's syndrome or history of prosthetic or native joint infection
2. Major chronic inflammatory disease or connective tissue disease other than RA, with the exception of secondary Sjögren's syndrome
3. Prior use of 2 or more biologic therapies for RA
4. Previous receipt of HUMIRA® (adalimumab) or a biosimilar of adalimumab
5. Ongoing use of prohibited treatments

Other Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneABP 501Adalimumab
Started264262
Completed243251
Not completed2111

Outcome results

  • Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24 (Primary), Number, percentage of participants: ABP 501 74.6; Adalimumab 72.4
  • Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28-C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) (Secondary), Least squares mean, units on a scale: ABP 501 -1.01 +/- 0.891; Adalimumab -0.96 +/- 0.890
  • Percentage of Participants With an ACR20 Response at Week 2 and Week 8 (Secondary), Number, percentage of participants: ABP 501 35.4; Adalimumab 24.5
  • Percentage of Participants With an ACR50 Response at Week 24 (Secondary), Number, percentage of participants: ABP 501 49.2; Adalimumab 52.0
  • Percentage of Participants With an ACR70 Response at Week 24 (Secondary), Number, percentage of participants: ABP 501 26.0; Adalimumab 22.9
  • Number of Participants With Adverse Events (Secondary), Number, participants: ABP 501 132; Adalimumab 143
  • Percentage of Participants Who Developed Antibodies to ABP 501 or Adalimumab (Secondary), Number, percentage of participants: ABP 501 38.3; Adalimumab 38.2

Adverse events

Time frame: From the time of first treatment but on or within 28 days following the last dose of study treatment; 26 weeks.

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
ABP 501010/264 (3.8%)17/264 (6.4%)
Adalimumab013/262 (5.0%)19/262 (7.3%)

Serious adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemABP 501Adalimumab
LymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/2640/262
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/2641/262
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders0/2641/262
Cardiopulmonary failureCardiac disorders1/2640/262
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/2641/262
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndromeCardiac disorders0/2641/262
EnterocolitisGastrointestinal disorders1/2640/262
Large intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders0/2641/262
Corneal graft rejectionImmune system disorders0/2641/262
HypersensitivityImmune system disorders1/2640/262
Appendicitis perforatedInfections and infestations1/2640/262
Arthritis bacterialInfections and infestations0/2641/262
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/2641/262
Peritoneal abscessInfections and infestations1/2640/262
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/2640/262
Pneumonia fungalInfections and infestations0/2641/262
SepsisInfections and infestations2/2640/262
Humerus fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/2640/262
Meniscus injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/2640/262
Thoracic vertebral fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2641/262
Foot deformityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/2641/262
OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/2641/262
PseudarthrosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/2641/262
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders1/2640/262
HypertensionVascular disorders1/2640/262
Venous thrombosis limbVascular disorders1/2640/262

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemABP 501Adalimumab
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations17/26419/262

+Locations (11)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Research SiteVictorville, CaliforniaUnited States
Research SiteJupiter, FloridaUnited States
Research SiteSandy Springs, GeorgiaUnited States
Research SiteLansing, MichiganUnited States
Research SiteMiddleburg Heights, OhioUnited States
Research SiteWinnipeg, ManitobaCanada
Research SiteHattingen, North Rhine-WestphaliaGermany
Research SiteBarnsley, EnglandUnited Kingdom
Research SiteNorth Shields, EnglandUnited Kingdom
Research SiteSuffolk, EnglandUnited Kingdom
Research SiteCardiff, WalesUnited Kingdom

+Publications

  • Results publication: Huizinga TWJ, Torii Y, Muniz R. Adalimumab Biosimilars in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Biosimilarity. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Mar;8(1):41-61. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00259-8. Epub 2020 Dec 1. PMID 33263165
  • Results publication: Cohen S, Genovese MC, Choy E, Perez-Ruiz F, Matsumoto A, Pavelka K, Pablos JL, Rizzo W, Hrycaj P, Zhang N, Shergy W, Kaur P. Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Oct;76(10):1679-1687. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210459. Epub 2017 Jun 5. PMID 28584187

+Investigators

  • MD, Study director, Amgen