Treatment of Painful Digital Neuroma Using A Pedicled Nerve Flap

NCT01684839 — Not applicable, Completed, 9 participants, The Second Hospital of Tangshan

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT01684839
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; na, single group, masking: none, treatment
Enrollment9 (Actual)
SponsorThe Second Hospital of Tangshan (Other); collaborators: Chinese PLA General Hospital, The Second Hospital of Qinhuangdao
ConditionsPainful Digital Neuroma
InterventionsPedicled nerve flap (Device)
Datesstart 2007-05-01, primary completion 2010-03-01, completion 2012-03-01, first posted 2012-09-13, last updated 2024-02-15
Locations1 site in China

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Painful Digital Neuroma All trials of Pedicled nerve flap

-Summary

Neuroma excision and digital nerve reconstruction remain the best option for the treatment of Painful Digital Neuroma (PDN). When the distal nerve end is preserved, conventional nonvascularized nerve grafting is the primary option to bridge the defect. The investigators hypothesize the pedicled nerve flap taken from the dorsal branch of the homolateral digital nerve is better than conventional methods for reconstruction of the digital nerve defect after painful neuroma resection.

This study reports treatment of painful digital neuroma using a pedicled nerve flap taken from the dorsal branch of homolateral digital nerve. From May 2007 to March 2010, the patients had previous nerve injuries with or without nerve repair. The mechanisms of injury include sharp cut, avulsion and crush. The defects were between the middle of the distal phalanx and the palmar digital crease.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Our selection criteria in this study included a patient with PDN in a scarred wound bed or poor coverage, a PDN located between the middle of the distal phalanx and the palmar digital crease, and a defect of the digital nerve after neuroma resection equal to or less than 3 cm in length. The exclusion criteria included a PDN in healthy soft tissue, a digital nerve defect longer than 3 cm, injury to the course of the pedicle or the donor nerve, and a thumb neuroma. A finger with a small distal end of the digital nerve was also excluded, because neurorrhaphy was extremely difficult in this situation.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
new surgical treatmentOtherDevice: Pedicled nerve flapTreatment of Painful Digital Neuroma Using A Pedicled Nerve Flap taken from the homolateral dorsal branch of the digital nerve.
  • Pedicled nerve flap (Device), also known as Surgical flap, Island flap: This nerve flap is a vascularized nerve graft

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Static 2-point Discrimination Test [20-26 months postoperatively]: The Static 2-point Discrimination Test determined the minimal distance at which a subject can sense the presence of two needles. The modified American Society for Surgery of the Hand guidelines was used to stratify the 2PD measurements (excellent <6 mm; good 6-10 mm; fair 11-15 mm; poor >15 mm). The test points were at the center of the radial or ulnar portion of the finger pulp (i.e., injury side). Each area was tested 3 times with a discriminator (Ali Med, Dedham, MA). Two out of 3 correct answers were considered proof of perception before proceeding to another lower value. We stopped at 4mm as a limit of 2PD and consider this normal. The measurements were performed at a single time point at the final follow up.

Secondary outcomes

  • Cold Intolerance Severity Score (CISS) Questionnaire [20-26 months postoperatively]: The maximum score was 100 and was grouped into 4 ranges (0-25; 26-50; 51-75; and 76-100), corresponding to mild, moderate, severe, and extreme severity, respectively.

Other outcomes

  • Tinel's Sign [20-26 months postoperatively]: Tinel's sign was graded as the following: grade 1=none; grade 2=mild, slight tingle; grade 3=moderate, very uncomfortable; and grade 4=severe, patient unable to use hand because of any stimulation of the neuroma

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 15 Years to 55 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* a patient with PDN in a scarred wound bed or poor coverage
* a PDN located between the middle of the distal phalanx and the palmar digital crease
* a defect of the digital nerve after neuroma resection equal to or less than 3 cm in length

Exclusion Criteria:

* a PDN in healthy soft tissue
* a digital nerve defect longer than 3 cm
* injury to the course of the pedicle or the donor nerve
* a thumb neuroma

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneNew Surgical Treatment
Started9
Completed9
Not completed0

Outcome results

  • Static 2-point Discrimination Test (Primary), Mean, mm: New Surgical Treatment 7.3 +/- 2.0
  • Cold Intolerance Severity Score (CISS) Questionnaire (Secondary)
  • Tinel's Sign (Other pre specified)

Adverse events

Time frame: 1 year

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
New Surgical Treatment00/9 (0.0%)0/9 (0.0%)

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
The Second Hospital of TangshanTangshan, HebeiChina

+Publications

  • Results publication: Herndon JH, Eaton RG, Littler JW. Management of painful neuromas in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Apr;58(3):369-73. PMID 1262369
  • Results publication: Tupper JW, Booth DM. Treatment of painful neuromas of sensory nerves in the hand: a comparison of traditional and newer methods. J Hand Surg Am. 1976 Sep;1(2):144-51. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(76)80008-1. PMID 1032972

+Investigators