Review of Complex Recurrent Hernia Repair

NCT01644695 — Unknown, 85 participants, Institute For Advanced Reconstruction

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Repair of Complex Recurrent Incisional Hernias With The Bony Anchoring Reinforcement System (BARS)

RegistryNCT01644695, acronym BARS
StatusUnknown
Study typeObservational
Enrollment85 (Actual)
SponsorInstitute For Advanced Reconstruction (Other)
ConditionsRecurrent Hernia
InterventionsBony Anchoring Reinforcement System (Procedure)
Datesstart 2011-10-01, primary completion 2020-01-01 (estimated), completion 2020-01-01 (estimated), first posted 2012-07-19, last updated 2012-10-15
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Recurrent Hernia All trials of Bony Anchoring Reinforcement System

-Summary

Abdominal wall incisional hernia is a common finding in patients who have undergone previous intra-abdominal surgeries. Common methods of abdominal fascial closure include primary closure, mesh inlay versus onlay, with or without component separation. All these methods have been shown to have recurrence rates for hernia between 3%-60% in the literature. The study describes the investigators innovative and preferred method for reconstruction of the abdominal wall as BARS (bony anchoring reinforcement system). This method manages the abdominal fascial integrity to reduce the recurrence of incisional hernia while providing an aesthetically superior abdominal wall contour.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

• Overview of Research

* 100 anticipated subjects
* Data collection methods- Patients will be evaluated with serial history and physical exams, as well as EMG evaluations. Patients will be asked to report their degree of function and satisfaction.
* Data analysis methods -Data that we will collect from patients will serve as anecdotal evidence to support the research theory.
* We will collect data from patients from testings conducted at the hospital and private office. We will be conducting pre-testing, post-testing, compare results, and surveys.
* The anticipated significance of this research study is that this procedure may greatly improve the quality of life of these severely debilitated patients, reduce the morbidity and mortality rates, and reduce the health care cost burden of chronic care and recurrent hospitalizations.
* The BARS technique for incisional hernia reconstruction provides excellent reinforcement with improved contour, decreased recurrence rates and decreased morbidity for the abdominal wall.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Candidate for BARS procedure.Procedure: Bony Anchoring Reinforcement SystemThe subjects selected for this trial were over 18 years of age with an appropriate complex, incisional hernia. These patients were consented and treated with the BARS(bony anchoring reinforcement system)procedure.
  • Bony Anchoring Reinforcement System (Procedure), also known as Mytec, Fasten, Marlex, Allomax, Alloderm, Strattice, Permacol: Abdominal exposure was obtained via a lower horizontal incision, a vertical incision, or through a combination horizontal/vertical (ie fleur-di-lis) pattern. Exploratory laparotomy, lysis of intra-abdominal adhesions with hernia sac excision was performed prior to fascial closure. Primary closure of the abdominal fascia was performed with a combination of components separation and placement of biologic mesh over the fascial incision line in onlay fashion. Typically three bone anchors were used to secure the synthetic mesh at the pubic symphysis and two bone anchors to the ASIS bilaterally. The superior aspect of the marlex mesh was sutured to fascia avoiding any incorporation of the costal perichondrium. Quilting sutures were used to secure the mesh to the rest of the abdominal fascia.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Recurrence Rate [ongoing, average 2.4 years]: Evidence of complex incisional hernia recurrence after treatment with BARS procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  • Intra and Post-Operative Complications [ongoing, average 2.4 years]: Record of intra and post operative complications resulting from BARS(bony anchoring reinforcement system) procedure including but not limited to scarring, pain, numbness, intra-abdominal injury, bleeding, death, infection, anesthesia complications, and need for further surgery.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients with recurrent abdominal wall incisional hernias
2. Age > 18
3. No medical contraindications to immunosuppressive therapy (in cases utilizing allograft)
4. Ability and motivation to follow up appropriately
5. Ability and motivation to adhere to rehabilitation regimen
6. Stable sequelae of initial CNS insult

Exclusion Criteria: Minors

1. Pregnancy
2. Major medical or psychiatric illness, which in the investigator's opinion would prevent completion of treatment and interfere with follow-up.
3. Patient unable to tolerate surgery, rehabilitation, or immunosuppressive therapy.

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneCandidate for BARS Procedure.
Started85
Completed85
Not completed0

Outcome results

  • Recurrence Rate (Primary), Number, participants: Candidate for BARS Procedure. 3
  • Intra and Post-Operative Complications (Secondary), Number, participants: Candidate for BARS Procedure. 27

Adverse events

Time frame: Adverse event data was collected with regular, ongoing follow up visits. Average time was 2.4 years.

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
All Participants00/85 (0.0%)27/85 (31.8%)

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemAll Participants
Wound DehiscenceSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders6/85
InfectionInfections and infestations2/85
NecrosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/85
HematomaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/85
CellulitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/85
DVTBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/85
Bowel obstructionGastrointestinal disorders1/85
NeuromaNervous system disorders2/85
Infected MeshInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/85
Drain IssueInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/85
Entrapped NerveNervous system disorders1/85
Neuralgia ParestheticaNervous system disorders1/85
Further Surgery RequiredInjury, poisoning and procedural complications7/85

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Institute For Advanced ReconstructionShrewsbury, New JerseyUnited States

+Publications

  • Tong WM, Hope W, Overby DW, Hultman CS. Comparison of outcome after mesh-only repair, laparoscopic component separation, and open component separation. Ann Plast Surg. 2011 May;66(5):551-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31820b3c91. PMID 21346524
  • Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990 Sep;86(3):519-26. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199009000-00023. PMID 2143588
  • Hawn MT, Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Finan KR, Vick CC. Long-term follow-up of technical outcomes for incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):648-55, 655-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.038. PMID 20421023
  • Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen MB, Iversen MG, Wara P, Rosenberg J, Friis-Andersen HF, Jorgensen LN. Nationwide study of early outcomes after incisional hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2009 Dec;96(12):1452-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6728. PMID 19918863
  • Sisco M, Dumanian GA. A simple technique to anchor prosthetic mesh to bone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Dec;116(7):2059-60. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000192622.53848.3a. No abstract available. PMID 16327650
  • Francis KR, Hoffman LA, Cornell C, Cortese A. The use of Mitek anchors to secure mesh in abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Feb;93(2):419-21. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199402000-00034. PMID 8310039

+Investigators