Evaluation of Marketed Contact Lens Disinfectant Systems on Eyelid Tissues

NCT01494818 — Not applicable, Completed, 79 participants, Alcon Research

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Evaluation of the Effects of Clear Care/AOSEPT Plus Hydrogen Peroxide Solution on the Eyelid Tissues - Part II: Comparative Evaluation With RENU MPS Over 3 Months of Wear

RegistryNCT01494818
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, supportive care
Enrollment79 (Actual)
SponsorAlcon Research (Industry)
ConditionsContact Lens Care
InterventionsHydrogen peroxide-based contact lens care system, PHMB-containing contact lens solution, Soft contact lenses (Device)
Datesstart 2011-11-01, primary completion 2012-07-01, completion 2012-07-01, first posted 2011-12-19, last updated 2013-09-27

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Contact Lens Care All trials of Hydrogen peroxide-based contact lens care system All trials of PHMB-containing contact lens solution

-Summary

The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the effect of the repeated usage of two different contact lens care systems (one hydrogen peroxide-based cleaning and disinfecting system, and one polyaminopropyl biguanide (PHMB)-containing multipurpose system) with silicone hydrogel contact lenses worn on a daily wear basis for three months. The specific aspect of interest was the effect on the ocular tissue, in particular the eyelids and their associations with the contact lens surface wettability and surface contamination.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The subjects attended the enrollment visit having worn their habitual silicone hydrogel contact lenses for at least six hours on the day of the visit. The enrollment visit was scheduled so that the subjects' habitual lenses were at least 14 ± 3 days old for the subjects replacing their lenses bi-weekly and at least 30 ± 5 days old for those replacing their lenses monthly.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
CLEAR CARE/AOSEPT PlusExperimentalDevice: Hydrogen peroxide-based contact lens care system; Device: Soft contact lensesHydrogen peroxide-based contact lens care system used per manufacturer's instructions
ReNu MultiPlusActive comparatorDevice: PHMB-containing contact lens solution; Device: Soft contact lensesPHMB-containing contact lens solution used per manufacturer's instructions
  • Hydrogen peroxide-based contact lens care system (Device), also known as CLEAR CARE®/AOSEPT Plus
  • PHMB-containing contact lens solution (Device), also known as ReNu® MultiPlus Multi-Purpose solution
  • Soft contact lenses (Device): Contact lenses identical to habitual prescription worn per usual replacement regimen

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Maximum Papillae [Baseline, Month 3]: Eyelid papillae (bumps on the inner eyelid) were recorded separately for three zones of the upper lid and overall for the lower lid on a 5-point forced choice scale (0 = None; 1 = Slight (diffuse papillae); 2 = Mild (diffuse \& tufts papillae); 3 = Moderate (moderate \& tufts papillae); 4 = Severe (giant papillae). The maximum value represents the worse grade in any zone. Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
  • Maximum Eyelid Hyperaemia [Baseline, Month 3]: Eyelid hyperaemia (redness) was recorded separately for three zones of the upper lid and overall for the lower lid on a 5-point forced choice scale (0 = Clear; 1 = Slight redness; 2 = Mild redness; 3 = Moderate redness; 4 = Severe redness). The maximum value represents the worst grade in any zone. Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
  • Upper Lid Redness [Baseline, Month 3]: The contact lenses were removed and upper lid redness was objectively measured through digital images. The coverage of the palpebral surface by blood vessels is expressed as percentage of the total surface measured. Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
  • Change From Baseline in Upper Eyelid Margin Staining at Month 3 [Baseline, Month 3]: The contact lens was removed and ophthalmic dye was instilled. Upper eyelid margin staining was objectively measured through digital images. The extent of true staining (i.e., the total area of lid margin covered by staining) was recorded. Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.

Secondary outcomes

  • Median Non-Invasive Pre-Lens Tear Film Break Up Time (PL-NIBUT) [Baseline, Month 3]: The pre-lens tear film is the layer of tears located on top of the contact lens (i.e., between the eyelid and the contact lens). The time required for a dry spot to appear on the pre-lens surface after blinking is referred to as the pre-lens tear film break up time. PL-NIBUT was evaluated using a biomicroscope with a diffuse illumination source, i.e., Tearscope. A longer PL-NIBUT indicates a more stable tear film and greater on-eye lens wettability. Three PL-NIBUT measurements were recorded, and the median value was used for analysis. Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
  • Protective Index [Baseline, Month 3]: A digital video recording was made of the interblink period. The percentage of area of the visible contact lens covered by the tear film was calculated (Protected Area). The Protective Index is defined as the average tear coverage over the whole interblink period. Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
  • Median Front Lens Deposits [Baseline, Month 3]: Deposits present on the front surface of the lens were assessed with a biomicroscope while the lens was on eye. Deposits were rated on a 5-point forced choice scale (0 = none; 1 = slight; = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe) in five lens zones. The median of the five zones was used for analysis. Both eyes were included in the model for analysis.
  • Total Lipid Uptake Per Lens [Baseline, Month 3]: The contact lens was aseptically removed from the eye. Lipids were extracted and analyzed using a proprietary High Performance Liquid Chromatography technique. A lower value would indicate a cleaner lens surface.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Read and understand Participant Information Sheet;
* Read, sign, and date Informed Consent;
* Successfully wearing silicone hydrogel contact lenses under a frequent replacement (biweekly or monthly) daily wear modality;
* Using a PHMB-containing multipurpose contact lens solution;
* Symptomatic, as specified in protocol;
* Best corrected visual acuity of 6/9 or better in each eye;
* Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Any known sensitivity or intolerance to the contact lenses or len care products to be used;
* Systemic disease/medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or produce dry eye side effects;
* Ocular allergies or ocular disease which might interfere with contact lens wear;
* Use of any concomitant topical ocular medications during the study period;
* Participation in an investigational drug or device study within 30 days of entering the study;
* Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneCLEAR CARE/AOSEPT PlusReNu MultiPlus
Started3939
Completed3737
Not completed22

Outcome results

  • Maximum Papillae (Primary), Median, Units on a scale: CLEAR CARE/AOSEPT Plus 2.0 (0 to 4); ReNu MultiPlus 2.0 (0 to 3)
  • Maximum Eyelid Hyperaemia (Primary), Median, Units on a scale: CLEAR CARE/AOSEPT Plus 2.0 (1 to 4); ReNu MultiPlus 2.0 (1 to 4)
  • Median Non-Invasive Pre-Lens Tear Film Break Up Time (PL-NIBUT) (Secondary), Mean, Seconds: CLEAR CARE/AOSEPT Plus 4.05 (0.90 to 32.00); ReNu MultiPlus 5.08 (1.20 to 16.60)
  • Upper Lid Redness (Primary), Mean, Percentage of total surface measured: CLEAR CARE/AOSEPT Plus 34.8 +/- 6.8; ReNu MultiPlus 34.9 +/- 6.1
  • Change From Baseline in Upper Eyelid Margin Staining at Month 3 (Primary), Mean, square millimeters: CLEAR CARE/AOSEPT Plus -0.014 +/- 3.905; ReNu MultiPlus -0.754 +/- 4.179
  • Protective Index (Secondary), Mean, Percent of visible contact lens surface: CLEAR CARE/AOSEPT Plus 95.9 +/- 11.0; ReNu MultiPlus 95.8 +/- 10.2
  • Median Front Lens Deposits (Secondary), Median, Units on a scale: CLEAR CARE/AOSEPT Plus 0 (0 to 2); ReNu MultiPlus 0 (0 to 1)
  • Total Lipid Uptake Per Lens (Secondary), Mean, micrograms: CLEAR CARE/AOSEPT Plus 38.95 (4.121 to 95.504); ReNu MultiPlus 36.44 (4.150 to 97.875)

Adverse events

Time frame: Adverse events were collected for the duration of the study. The safety population includes all participants exposed to test product.

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
CLEAR CARE/AOSEPT Plus02/39 (5.1%)3/39 (7.7%)
ReNu MultiPlus00/39 (0.0%)0/39 (0.0%)

Serious adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemCLEAR CARE/AOSEPT PlusReNu MultiPlus
HysterectomySurgical and medical procedures1/390/39
HospitalizationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/390/39

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemCLEAR CARE/AOSEPT PlusReNu MultiPlus
Toxic reaction to solutionEye disorders3/390/39

+Investigators