HOme Vision Monitoring in AREDS2 for Progression to Neovascular AMD Using the ForeseeHome Device

NCT01103505 — Not applicable, Completed, 1520 participants, Notal Vision Ltd.

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

The HOME Study: HOme Vision Monitoring in AREDS2 for Progression to Neovascular AMD Using the ForeseeHome Device - (HOme Monitoring of the Eye)

RegistryNCT01103505, acronym AREDS
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, diagnostic
Enrollment1520 (Actual)
SponsorNotal Vision Ltd. (Industry)
ConditionsAge Related Macular Degeneration
InterventionsForeseeHome AMD Monitoring Device (Diagnostic test)
Datesstart 2010-05-01, primary completion 2013-10-01, completion 2013-12-01, first posted 2010-04-14, last updated 2019-07-30
Locations38 sites in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Age Related Macular Degeneration All trials of ForeseeHome AMD Monitoring Device

-Summary

The overall objective of this two arm randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to determine if home monitoring using the comprehensive visual field and telemedicine solution based on the ForeseeHome device in AREDS2 improves detection of progression to choroidal neovascularization (CNV) when compared with standard care.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The overall objective of this two arm randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to determine if home monitoring using the comprehensive visual field and telemedicine solution based on the ForeseeHome device in AREDS2 (referred to as the ForeseeHome comprehensive solution) participants at high risk of progression to neovascular AMD improves detection of progression to choroidal neovascularization (CNV) when compared with standard care. The primary outcome of this study is presenting best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the time of CNV diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include time to confirmed CNV diagnosis, lesion size, lesion location (extrafoveal, juxtafoveal, or subfoveal), lesion type (occult without classic, predominantly classic or minimally classic), sensitivity and specificity, and BCVA following three consecutive months of treatment and twelve months after the initial start of CNV treatment with an intravitreal anti-VEGF agent using either ranibizumab or bevacizumab. Outcomes will be ascertained via the following specific aims:

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
ForeseeHome AMD Monitoring DeviceOtherDiagnostic Test: ForeseeHome AMD Monitoring DeviceParticipants in the device monitoring arm will receive a packed device at home, with instructions to install and connect the device to a modem as well as instructions for daily use of the device in addition to standard care
Standard care alone (control) armNo interventionStandard care instruction per clinic routine for home vision monitoring to detect progression of AMD and routine eye exams
  • ForeseeHome AMD Monitoring Device (Diagnostic test): Earlier detection of progression from intermediate dry age-related macular degeneration to CNV between routine eye exams through home diagnostic testing with the ForeseeHome AMD Monitoring device

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Primary Outcome: Change in Visual Acuity (LogMAR Letters) From Baseline to Detection of Choroidal Neovascularization [2 years]: Mean change in BCVA (logMAR letters) from baseline to the time of confirmed progression to CNV in the ForeseeHome device monitoring group compared to the standard care group.

Secondary outcomes

  • Secondary Outcome: Patients Who Maintained 20/40 or Better Vision at Time of CNV Detection [2 years]: Percent of patients who maintained 20/40 or better vision at the time of CNV detection in each study arm
  • Secondary Outcome: Lesion Size (Total Lesion Area) at Time of Confirmed Progression to CNV [2 years]: Median lesion size (total lesion area) at time of confirmed progression to CNV as measured on fluorescein angiography (FA) will be compared between the two study arms. Lesion size was assessed, measured, and reported by optic disc areas, where 1 disc area = 2.54 mm\^2.
  • Secondary Outcome: Lesion Size (CNV Area) at Time of Confirmed Progression to CNV [2 years]: Median lesion size (CNV area) at time of confirmed progression to CNV as measured on fluorescein angiography will be compared between the two study arms. Lesion size was assessed, measured, and reported by optic disc areas, where 1 disc area = 2.54 mm\^2.
  • Secondary Outcome: Lesion Size (Fluid Area) at Time of Confirmed Progression to CNV [2 years]: Median lesion size (fluid area) at time of confirmed progression to CNV as measured on fluorescein angiography will be compared between the two study arms. Lesion size was assessed, measured, and reported by optic disc areas, where 1 disc area = 2.54 mm\^2.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 55 Years to any

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

* Male or female participant between 55 and 90 years of age. Participants must have bilateral large drusen (at least 125 micron), or large drusen in the posterior pole in one eye (study eye) and advanced AMD (neovascular AMD or central geographic atrophy) in the fellow eye as determined by their study ophthalmologist. Likelihood, willingness, and ability to return for multiple visits (potentially within the same month) for at least 2 years.
* Participant must be English speaking and understand and sign the protocol's informed consent document.
* Participant must be able to successfully demonstrate their ability to comprehend instructions and use of the ForeseeHome device (a ForeseeHome device will be available at the clinic for the participant to demonstrate their ability).
* Participant's address to which the ForeseeHome device will be sent, if randomized to the device monitoring arm, must be located in the U.S.A.
* Study eye(s) must have best corrected visual acuity 20/60 or better (at least 54 letters).
* Ocular media sufficient to allow adequate quality fundus photography.
* Participant must be willing to have name and contact information provided to Notal Vision.
* Participant must consent to be examined by the study ophthalmologist when changes in symptoms are detected by the home-device or by standard of care or when unreliable test results occur during the usage period.
* If randomized to the device monitoring arm, participant must agree to take the device with them if staying somewhere else other than their primary residence for 14 days or more.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

* Participant has evidence of macular or retinal disorders other than AMD in the study eye(s).
* Participant has known adverse reaction to fluorescein dye or refuses further fluorescein angiograms.
* Participant's eye is receiving (or is expected to receive) an eye examination on a continuing basis by an eye care professional more frequently than every four months
* NonAREDS2 participant currently enrolled in another study that may likely affect adherence with The HOME Study
* Previous retinal or other ocular surgical procedures, the effects of which may now or in the future complicate assessment of the progression of AMD in the study eye.
* Chronic requirement for any systemic or ocular medication administered for other diseases
* Cataract surgery within one month of randomization.
* Participant that has any condition that would make adherence to study follow up procedures for at least one year difficult or unlikely

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneDevice Monitoring ArmStandard Care (Control) Arm
Started763757
Completed739737
Not completed2420

Outcome results

  • Primary Outcome: Change in Visual Acuity (LogMAR Letters) From Baseline to Detection of Choroidal Neovascularization (Primary), Mean, LogMAR letters (ETDRS): ForeseeHome + Standard Care at CNV Progression -7.4 +/- 11.4; Standard Care Alone (Control) at CNV Progression -12.6 +/- 16.5
  • Secondary Outcome: Patients Who Maintained 20/40 or Better Vision at Time of CNV Detection (Secondary), Number, percentage of patients: Device Monitoring Arm 87; Standard Care (Control) Arm 64
  • Secondary Outcome: Lesion Size (Total Lesion Area) at Time of Confirmed Progression to CNV (Secondary), Median, Disc Areas: Device Monitoring Arm 0.23 (0 to 0.91); Standard Care (Control) Arm 0.70 (0 to 1.50)
  • Secondary Outcome: Lesion Size (CNV Area) at Time of Confirmed Progression to CNV (Secondary), Median, Disc Areas: Device Monitoring Arm 0.17 (0 to 0.69); Standard Care (Control) Arm 0.60 (0 to 1.50)
  • Secondary Outcome: Lesion Size (Fluid Area) at Time of Confirmed Progression to CNV (Secondary), Median, Disc Areas: Device Monitoring Arm 0.55 (0 to 1.15); Standard Care (Control) Arm 0.90 (0 to 2.20)

Adverse events

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Device Monitoring Arm0/763 (0.0%)0/763 (0.0%)0/763 (0.0%)
Standard Care (Control) Arm0/757 (0.0%)0/757 (0.0%)0/757 (0.0%)

+Locations (38)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Jones Eye Institute - UAMSLittle Rock, ArkansasUnited States
Shiley Eye Center - UCSDLa Jolla, CaliforniaUnited States
Loma Linda Univ.Loma Linda, CaliforniaUnited States
Univ. of California, DavisSacramento, CaliforniaUnited States
Colorado Retina Assoc.Denver, ColoradoUnited States
Eldorado Retina AssociatesLouisville, ColoradoUnited States
Yale Univ. Eye CenterNew Haven, ConnecticutUnited States
Univ. of Florida Health Science CenterJacksonville, FloridaUnited States
Bascom Palmer Eye InstituteMiami, FloridaUnited States
Sarasota Retina InstituteSarasota, FloridaUnited States
Emory Univ. Eye CenterAtlanta, GeorgiaUnited States
Georgia Retina, P.C.Decatur, GeorgiaUnited States
Retina Associates of KentuckyLexington, KentuckyUnited States
Elman Retina Group, PABaltimore, MarylandUnited States
Wilmer Eye InstituteBaltimore, MarylandUnited States
Retina Group of WashingtonChevy Chase, MarylandUnited States
Ophthalmic Cons. of BostonBoston, MassachusettsUnited States
Kresge Eye InstituteDetroit, MichiganUnited States
Vision Research FoundationGrand Rapids, MichiganUnited States
Vision Research FoundationRoyal Oak, MichiganUnited States
Vision Research FoundationTraverse City, MichiganUnited States
Delaware Valley Retina AssociatesLawrenceville, New JerseyUnited States
Retina Research FoundationSlingerlands, New YorkUnited States
Charlotte Eye Ear Nose and Throat AssocCharlotte, North CarolinaUnited States
Duke Univ.Durham, North CarolinaUnited States
Case Western Reserve Univ.Cleveland, OhioUnited States
Retina Assoc. of ClevelandCleveland, OhioUnited States
Pennsylvania Retina Specialists, P.C.Camp Hill, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Penn State M.S. Hershey Med CtrHershey, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Scheie Eye InstitutePhiladelphia, PennsylvaniaUnited States
UPMC Eye CenterPittsburgh, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Univ. of Tennessee HSCMemphis, TennesseeUnited States
Texas Retina AssociatesDallas, TexasUnited States
Retina Consult. of HoustonHouston, TexasUnited States
Texas Retina AssociatesLubbock, TexasUnited States
John Moran Eye Center, Univ. of UtahSalt Lake City, UtahUnited States
Univ. of WisconsinMadison, WisconsinUnited States
Medical College of WisconsinMilwaukee, WisconsinUnited States

+Investigators