Anagrelide vs. Hydroxyurea - Efficacy and Tolerability Study in Patients With Essential Thrombocythaemia

NCT01065038 — Phase 3, Completed, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Single Blind, Multi-centre, Randomised Multinational Phase III Study to Compare the Efficacy and Tolerability of Anagrelide vs Hydroxyurea in Patients With Essential Thrombocythaemia

RegistryNCT01065038, acronym ANAHYDRET
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional
SponsorAOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG (Industry)
ConditionsEssential Thrombocythaemia
InterventionsAnagrelide, Hydroxyurea (Drug)
Datesstart 2002-09-01, first posted 2010-02-09, last updated 2010-10-06
Locations24 sites in Austria, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Poland and 2 more countries

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Essential Thrombocythaemia All trials of Anagrelide All trials of Hydroxyurea

-Summary

Study AOP 03-007 was designed as a pivotal study to test, if Anagrelide (Thromboreductin®)was not inferior to HU with respect to efficacy in patients with ET. This approach to demonstrate non-inferiority was based on the following decision points:

• ET is a rare disease and recruitment of large patient number (> 1600) to prove superiority was not considered possible.

. It was decided to recruit only treatment naïve high risk patients to avoid pre-treatment bias, which further limited the number of patients eligible for the study.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
AnagrelideExperimentalDrug: Anagrelide
HydroxyureaActive comparatorDrug: Hydroxyurea
  • Anagrelide (Drug)
  • Hydroxyurea (Drug)

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Presence of essential thrombocythaemia with high-risk profile.

Exclusion Criteria:

* previous treatment with cytoreductive drugs or Anagrelide
* pregnant women or women in childbearing age with inadequate contraception
* patients with contraindications for study drugs due to anaphylactoid reactions to either active or non-active ingredients
* known lactose intolerance
* cardiovascular diseases grade III-IV (Toxicity Criteria of the South West Oncology Group, 1992) - with a negative benefit/risk ratio
* severe renal disease (Creatinin Clearance < 30 ml/min)
* severe liver disease (AST or ALT > 5-times normal)
* coexisting, malignant, systemic diseases

+Locations (24)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Center AKHVienna, State of ViennaAustria
Center HanuschVienna, State of ViennaAustria
Center InnsbruckInnsbruck, TyrolAustria
Center BrnoBrnoCzechia
Center OlomoucOlomoucCzechia
Center PrahaPragueCzechia
Center ParisParis, Clichy CedexFrance
Center MunichMunich, BavariaGermany
Center BerlinBerlinGermany
Center HalleHalleGermany
Center SaarbrückenSaarbrückenGermany
Center UlmUlmGermany
Center BudapestBudapestHungary
Center ModenaModenaItaly
Center PaviaPaviaItaly
Center VilniusVilniusLithuania
Center GdanskGdanskPoland
Center KatowiceKatowicePoland
Center KrakowKrakowPoland
Center LodzLodzPoland
Center LublinLublinPoland
Center WarszawaWarsawPoland
Center SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
Center LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

+Publications

  • Results publication: Gisslinger H, Gotic M, Holowiecki J, Penka M, Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM, Kralovics R, Petrides PE; ANAHYDRET Study Group. Anagrelide compared with hydroxyurea in WHO-classified essential thrombocythemia: the ANAHYDRET Study, a randomized controlled trial. Blood. 2013 Mar 7;121(10):1720-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-443770. Epub 2013 Jan 11. PMID 23315161