AZD2066 Neuropathic Pain - Mechanical Hypersensitivity

NCT00939094 — Phase 2, Terminated, 87 participants, AstraZeneca

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Phase IIa, Double-Blind, Randomised, Parallel-Group, Multi-Centre Study to Evaluate the Analgesic Efficacy of 28 Days Oral Administration of AZD2066 Compared to Placebo in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Patients With Mechanical Hypersensitivity

RegistryNCT00939094, acronym NP-MH
StatusTerminated
PhasePhase 2
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: quadruple, treatment
Enrollment87 (Actual)
SponsorAstraZeneca (Industry); collaborators: Quintiles, Inc.
ConditionsNeuropathic Pain, Mechanical Hypersensitivity
InterventionsAZD2066, Placebo (Drug)
Datesstart 2009-08-01, primary completion 2010-11-01, completion 2010-11-01, first posted 2009-07-14, last updated 2012-09-27
Locations38 sites in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Neuropathic Pain All trials for Mechanical Hypersensitivity All trials of AZD2066 All trials of Placebo

-Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate if 28 days of treatment with AZD2066 compared to placebo can relieve the pain arising from the nervous system when the patients are touched by something that should not cause pain or have severe pain when they are touched by something that should only cause a little pain.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
AExperimentalDrug: AZD2066
BPlacebo comparatorDrug: Placebo
  • AZD2066 (Drug): Capsule, once daily
  • Placebo (Drug): Capsule, once daily

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Change in Mean Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score From Baseline to Last 5 Days on Treatment [Change in mean pain intensity from 5-day baseline to the last 5 days on treatment, measure twice daily with NRS (12-hour recall)]: Mean pain intensity for 5-day baseline period (morning Day -5 to evening Day-1) and mean pain intensity for last 5 days on treatment (ie, last dose day and the 4 preceding calendar days) was calculated based on the NRS scale (0-10). 0=No pain, 10=Worst pain imaginable.

Secondary outcomes

  • Patients With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in NRS Pain Intensity Score (Responder Rate) at Day 28 [28 days]: NRS pain intensity score reduction=(change from baseline at Day 28/baseline)*100 Responder=pain intensity score reduction ≥30% (yes/no)? Responder rate=(no. of responders/total no. of patients)*100
  • Patients With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in NRS Pain Intensity Score (Responder Rate) at Day 28 [28 days]: Pain intensity score reduction=(change from baseline Day 28/baseline)*100 Responder=pain intensity score reduction ≥50% (Yes/No)? Responder rate=(no. of responders/total no. of patients)*100
  • Patients With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score of at Least "Much Improved" (Responder Rate) at Day 28 [28 days]: PGIC scale ranges from 1-7 where 1=Very much improved and 7=Very much worse Responder=Patient with a response of " much improved" or "very much improved" Responder rate=(no. of responders/total no. of patients)*100
  • Change in Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Sensory Index From Baseline to Day 28 [28 days]: Sensory index=sum of the intensity scale values of the words chosen for the descriptors 1-11 in the questionnaire. Range of scores for the sensory index=0-33 (higher score represents a worse condition). Change from baseline (measured prior to randomization) to Day 28 was calculated.
  • Change in SF-MPQ Affective Index From Baseline to Day 28 [28 days]: Affective index=sum of the intensity scale values of the words chosen for the descriptors 12-15 in the questionnaire. Range of scores for the affective index=0-12 (higher score represents a worse condition). Change from baseline (measured prior to randomization) to Day 28 was calculated.
  • Change in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Pain Severity From Baseline to Day 28 [28 days]: Change from baseline (measured prior to randomization) to Day 28 was calculated for the pain severity (mean of 4 intensity items). Each intensity item is recorded on a NRS 0-10, where 0=No Pain and 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine.
  • Change in BPI-SF Pain Interference From Baseline to Day 28 [28 days]: Change from baseline (measured prior to randomization) to Day 28 was calculated for pain interference (mean of 7 interference items). Each interference item is recorded on a NRS 0-10, where 0=No interference and 10=Interferes completely.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures.
* Male or non-fertile females
* Painful symptoms due to neuropathic pain for a period of 3 months to 5 years, associated with mechanical allodynia and/or punctate hyperalgesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Other pain that may confound assessment of neuropathic pain.
* Diagnosis of any severe neurological disease.
* History of significant psychiatric disease/condition and/or history of psychotic disorders among first degree relatives.

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneA - AZD20662 - Placebo
Started4245
Completed2835
Not completed1410

Outcome results

  • Change in Mean Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score From Baseline to Last 5 Days on Treatment (Primary), Least squares mean, Scores (units) on NRS: A - AZD2066 -2.14 +/- 0.358; 2 - Placebo -1.26 +/- 0.337
  • Patients With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline in NRS Pain Intensity Score (Responder Rate) at Day 28 (Secondary), Number, Participants: A - AZD2066 16; 2 - Placebo 10
  • Patients With ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in NRS Pain Intensity Score (Responder Rate) at Day 28 (Secondary), Number, Participants: A - AZD2066 10; 2 - Placebo 5
  • Patients With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score of at Least "Much Improved" (Responder Rate) at Day 28 (Secondary), Number, Patients: A - AZD2066 10; 2 - Placebo 10
  • Change in Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Sensory Index From Baseline to Day 28 (Secondary), Least squares mean, Scores (units) on SF-MPQ Sensory Index: A - AZD2066 -6.39 +/- 1.278; 2 - Placebo -3.98 +/- 1.188
  • Change in SF-MPQ Affective Index From Baseline to Day 28 (Secondary), Least squares mean, Scores (units) on SF-MPQ Affective Index: A - AZD2066 -1.1 +/- 0.52; 2 - Placebo -0.9 +/- 0.50
  • Change in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Pain Severity From Baseline to Day 28 (Secondary), Least squares mean, Scores (units) on BPI-SF pain severity: A - AZD2066 -2.12 +/- 0.385; 2 - Placebo -1.25 +/- 0.360
  • Change in BPI-SF Pain Interference From Baseline to Day 28 (Secondary), Least squares mean, Scores on BPI-SF pain interference: A - AZD2066 -1.98 +/- 0.376; 2 - Placebo -1.72 +/- 0.360

Adverse events

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
A - AZD206601/42 (2.4%)30/42 (71.4%)
2 - Placebo00/44 (0.0%)15/44 (34.1%)

Serious adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemA - AZD20662 - Placebo
Psychotic DisorderPsychiatric disorders1/420/44

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemA - AZD20662 - Placebo
DizzinessNervous system disorders10/423/44
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/424/44
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/422/44
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders3/422/44
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders3/421/44
ParaesthesiaNervous system disorders3/420/44
SomnolenceNervous system disorders3/420/44
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/423/44

Limitations and caveats: Early termination of study for safety reasons leading to fewer subjects analyzed than originally planned.

+Locations (38)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Research SiteTucson, ArizonaUnited States
Research SiteLos Angeles, CaliforniaUnited States
Research SiteSacramento, CaliforniaUnited States
Research SiteSan Francisco, CaliforniaUnited States
Research SiteWalnut Creek, CaliforniaUnited States
Research SiteBoulder, ColoradoUnited States
Research SiteAtlantis, FloridaUnited States
Research SiteAventura, FloridaUnited States
Research SiteClearwater, FloridaUnited States
Research SiteFort Myers, FloridaUnited States
Research SiteOrlando, FloridaUnited States
Research SitePalm Beach Gardens, FloridaUnited States
Research SiteSarasota, FloridaUnited States
Research SiteSt. Petersburg, FloridaUnited States
Research SiteSunrise, FloridaUnited States
Research SiteCanton, GeorgiaUnited States
Research SiteMarietta, GeorgiaUnited States
Research SiteEvansville, IndianaUnited States
Research SiteNew Orleans, LouisianaUnited States
Research SiteBrockton, MassachusettsUnited States
Research SiteBingham Farms, MichiganUnited States
Research SiteLas Vegas, NevadaUnited States
Research SiteReno, NevadaUnited States
Research SiteLumberton, New JerseyUnited States
Research SiteWillingboro, New JerseyUnited States
Research SiteAlbuquerque, New MexicoUnited States
Research SiteJacksonville, North CarolinaUnited States
Research SiteWinston-Salem, North CarolinaUnited States
Research SiteKettering, OhioUnited States
Research SitePortland, OregonUnited States
Research SiteBridgeville, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Research SitePhiladelphia, PennsylvaniaUnited States
Research SiteAustin, TexasUnited States
Research SiteDallas, TexasUnited States
Research SiteIrving, TexasUnited States
Research SiteLexington, TexasUnited States
Research SiteLongview, TexasUnited States
Research SiteSan Antonio, TexasUnited States

+Investigators

  • Biljana Lilja, Study director, AstraZeneca R&D Södertälje151 85 Södertälje, Sweden
  • Brett Stacey, Principal investigator, Oregon Health and Science University Comprehensive Pain Clinic, Portland, OR 97239, USA