European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices

NCT00461175 — Completed, 63194 participants, Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Germany

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT00461175, acronym EURAS-IUD
StatusCompleted
Study typeObservational
Enrollment63194 (Actual)
SponsorCenter for Epidemiology and Health Research, Germany (Other); collaborators: Bayer
ConditionsUterine Perforation
Datesstart 2006-11-01, primary completion 2012-05-01, completion 2013-12-01, first posted 2007-04-17, last updated 2015-07-17
Locations1 site in Germany

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Uterine Perforation

-Summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the risks of intrauterine device (IUD) use in a study population that is representative for the actual users of the individual IUDs. The primary clinical outcome of interest is the uterine perforation rate.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

This is a large, multinational, prospective, controlled, long-term cohort study that follows a series of cohorts. The cohorts consist of new users of different groups of intrauterine devices (IUDs). Primarily, a non-interference approach - with exception of the standardized diagnostic workup to identify uterine perforations - will be used to provide standardized, comprehensive and reliable information on these IUDs under routine medical conditions.

The primary objective of the study is to assess the risks of intrauterine device (IUD) use in a study population that is representative for the actual users of the individual IUDs. The primary clinical outcome of interest is the uterine perforation rate. Secondary objectives are among others:

* the time intervals between IUD insertion and uterine perforation
* impact of post-partal IUD insertion on the uterine perforation rate
* proportion of uterine perforations associated with IUD insertion with serious clinical complications
* the incidences of medically relevant adverse events associated with IUP use

The combined cohort will include 60000 women recruited in six European countries. Enrollment should begin in November 2006 and end in 2012. Patients should undergo follow-up for at least 1 year.

Recruitment of the cohort members will be conducted via a network of approximately 2000 gynecologists.

Enrollment procedures should not interfere with the prescribing behavior of physicians or with the individual needs of the participating women. Influence on the preference for specific oral contraceptives is to be avoided but significant efforts are to be undertaken to ensure standardized, comprehensive and reliable documentation of all baseline characteristics and adverse events during the follow-up period.

The study participants are women aged 18 or older who have a new insertion of an IUD and who are willing to participate in this cohort study. There are no specific medical inclusion or exclusion criteria. However, women who are not cooperative may be excluded from study participation. Also women with a language barrier will not be eligible for study inclusion.

This study will maintain scientific independence and will be governed by an independent Advisory Council. The Center for Epidemiology and Health Research in Berlin, Germany and its research team will be accountable for the Advisory Council (AC) in all scientific matters. The members of the AC wil be international experts in relevant scientific fields (e. g. epidemiology, gynecology and cardiology).

The study started after all relevant legal and ethical requirements had been fulfilled. Information on the identity of the patients and treating physicians will be kept separated from the clinical information throughout the study. All relevant national data protection laws will be followed.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
1Mirena®
2Copper IUD

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Uterine Perforation Rate [12 months after insertion]: Uterine perforation is a potentially serious complication of intrauterine device (IUD) use. The absolute risk of uterine perforation associated with the LNG IUS in routine medical practice has not hitherto been well defined. It is also unknown whether the perforation rate is higher with this IUD than with copper IUDs.

Other outcomes

  • Contraceptive Failure [Within 12 months]: Intrauterine contraceptive methods have low Pearl Indices. Nevertheless, there is a lack of comparative data between LNG IUS users and copper IUD users. Women with unintended pregnancies were explicitly aked whether the pregnancy occured despite IUD use. The 29 pregnancies that occured after unrecognized IUD expulsion were considered to have resulted from a failure of the contraceptive method and were therefore included in the analysis.

+Eligibility

Sex: Female, ages: 18 Years to any, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* women who have a new insertion of an IUD
* women who are willing to participate in this cohort study

Exclusion Criteria:

* women who are not cooperative
* women with a language barrier

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneLNG IUSCopper IUD
Started4360018735
Completed4307818370
Not completed522365

Outcome results

  • Uterine Perforation Rate (Primary), Number, participants: LNG IUS 61; Copper IUD 20
  • Contraceptive Failure (Other pre specified), Number, participants: LNG IUS 26; Copper IUD 92

Adverse events

Time frame: Information on adverse events was collected over a time period of 12 months.

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
LNG IUS021/43078 (0.0%)0/43078 (0.0%)
Copper IUD07/18370 (0.0%)0/18370 (0.0%)

Serious adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemLNG IUSCopper IUD
Venous thromboembolic eventCardiac disorders9/430785/18370
Cerebrovascular EventsCardiac disorders9/430781/18370
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders2/430781/18370
Other arterial thromboembolic eventCardiac disorders1/430780/18370

Limitations and caveats: In observational studies like EURAS-IUD, the possibility of bias and residual confounding can never be entirely eliminated. Thus, for risk estimates smaller than 2-fold, causality cannot be inferred confidently in view of alternative explanations.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Center for Epidemiology and Health ResearchBerlinGermany

+Publications

  • Results publication: Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, Minh TD. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 16. PMID 25601352
  • Results publication: Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, Minh TD. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):280-3. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jan 16. PMID 25601350

+Investigators